Poll
What aspect of Karna attracts you the most?
Bigg Boss 19- Daily Discussion Thread - 14th Oct 2025
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 15th Oct '25
KARWA CHAUTH 15.10
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai October 15, 2025 EDT.
Alia Bhatt is being roasted on Insta on Jigra BA post
Kajal,Vidya and Tanya ka Gharelu Kalesh
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai October 16, 2025 EDT
Sonakshi Sinha Pregnancy Rumours
Dost Dost na raha
Pankaj Dheer Passes Away
Rhea Chakraborty and her brother get their passports back
Welcome Back 🥳
Oh am very sorry.. i confused it.. the boons were taken a day or two before.. disclosure was done earlier.. though am not sure when.. will have to read.. but true that Karna did not have any emotional turmoil on Abhimanyu's death...People often quote these two.. Abimanyu vadh and Draupadi apmaan.. Even Arjuna was bothered more about insult of Gandiva than Abhimanyu's death.. But when it comes to unethical killing, give some lame reason, finish your job and move on..Yes Karna was an active participant in Draupadi vastraharan.. He had is own reason to do that.. But Vikarna spoke for Draupadi when Pandavas were silent.. Did they spare him for that? 😡
Vaisampayana continued,--"Beholding the Pandavas thus distressed and the princess of Panchala also thus afflicted, Vikarna the son of Dhritarashtra said--'Ye kings, answer ye the question that hath been asked by Yajnaseni. If we do not judge a matter referred to us, all of us will assuredly have to go to hell without delay. How is that Bhishma and Dhritarashtra, both of whom are the oldest of the Kurus, as also the high-souled Vidura, do not say anything! The son of Bharadwaja who is the preceptor of us, as also Kripa, is here. Why do not these best of regenerate ones answer the question? Let also those other kings assembled here from all directions answer according to their judgment this question, leaving aside all motives of gain and anger. Ye kings, answer ye the question that hath been asked by this blessed daughter of king Drupada, and declare after reflection on which side each of ye is.' Thus did Vikarna repeatedly appeal to those that were in that assembly. But those kings answered him not one word, good or ill. And Vikarna having repeatedly appealed to all the kings began to rub his hands and sigh like a snake. And at last the prince said--'Ye kings of the earth, ye Kauravas, whether ye answer this question or not, I will say what I regard as just and proper. Ye foremost of men, it hath been said that hunting, drinking, gambling, and too much enjoyment of women, are the four vices of kings. The man, that is addicted to these, liveth forsaking virtue. And people do not regard the acts done by a person who is thus improperly engaged, as of any authority. This son of Pandu, while deeply engaged in one of these vicious acts, urged thereto by deceitful gamblers, made Draupadi a stake. The innocent Draupadi is, besides, the common wife of all the sons of Pandu. And the king, having first lost himself offered her as a stake. And Suvala himself desirous of a stake, indeed prevailed upon the king to stake this Krishna. Reflecting upon all these circumstances, I regard Draupadi as not won."
"Hearing these words, a loud uproar rose from among those present in that assembly. And they all applauded Vikarna and censured the son of Suvala. And at that sound, the son of Radha, deprived of his senses by anger, waving his well-shaped arms, said these words,--'O Vikarna, many opposite and inconsistent conditions are noticeable in this assembly. Like fire produced from a faggot, consuming the faggot itself, this thy ire will consume thee. These personages here, though urged by Krishna, have not uttered a word. They all regard the daughter of Drupada to have been properly won. Thou alone, O son of Dhritarashtra in consequence of thy immature years, art bursting with wrath, for though but a boy thou speakest in the assembly as if thou wert old. O younger brother of Duryodhana, thou dost not know what morality truly is, for thou sayest like a fool that this Krishna who hath been (justly) won as not won at all. O son of Dhritarashtra, how dost thou regard Krishna as not won, when the eldest of the Pandavas before this assembly staked all his possessions? O bull of the Bharata race, Draupadi is included in all the possessions (of Yudhishthira). Therefore, why regardest thou Krishna who hath been justly won as not won? Draupadi had been mentioned (by Suvala) and approved of as a stake by the Pandavas. For what reason then dost thou yet regard her as not won? Or, if thou thinkest that bringing her hither attired in a single piece of cloth, is an action of impropriety, listen to certain excellent reasons I will give. O son of the Kuru race, the gods have ordained only one husband for one woman. This Draupadi, however, hath many husbands. Therefore, certain it is that she is an unchaste woman. To bring her, therefore, into this assembly attired though she be in one piece of cloth--even to uncover her is not at all an act that may cause surprise. Whatever wealth the Pandavas had--she herself and these Pandavas themselves,--have all been justly won by the son of Suvala. O Dussasana, this Vikarna speaking words of (apparent) wisdom is but a boy. Take off the robes of the Pandavas as also the attire of Draupadi. Hearing these words the Pandavas, O Bharata, took of their upper garments and throwing them down sat in that assembly.
Hey thanks for the verse.. and thats why I said he spoke for Draupadi.. Even Draupadi for that matter was unhappy with Yudi more.. I really hope this man never existed.. or atleast like in ur story.. 😉
Ok Bhima was not silent.. I think Arjun too recommended elders to answer Draupadi's question.. yet it was too late and that does not make them a responsible husband anyway.. if Duryodan's slave can vow for himself and assign vows to his brothers why not say 'Stop Jest' at any point he felt like to.. anytime before Draupadi was directly/indirectly staked..Good to know that he mourned for Vikarna's death.. I really felt he should have been spared for that one reason.. all people in the MB are so prone to take idiotic vows.. no reasoning, no conditions apply.. And how can we be sure that Vikarna, would have been spared? Changing side does not change his father na? 😆 may be he would have killed Vikarna the way Arjun killed Yudishtar... 😆
Arjun's vows, like you point out, were irrational, whether it was Jayadrath, his vow to kill anyone who insults his Gandhiva or anyone who insults Yudisthir.
For Arjuna, his Gandhiva was a part and parcel of his life. He developed a special relationship with his Gandhiva; the bow was an extension of his own self. Given that the bow belonged to Varuna, earlier, it was only natural that Arjuna came to regard it with reverence.The only parallel which I can quote is a violinist (or any instrumentalist) having his "special" instrument amongst the several he may possess.