Whether it was just signing amount or the entire sum is an equally clunky way to show Madhu as more popular.
And most bizarre is that the offer was maintained even with the knowledge that she is pregnant.
So the role was of a 'pregnant woman' like in the real-world actual film 'Kahaani'?
Or did the CVs gift the producer the convenient foresight to know Madhu would be having a miscarriage soon, and that she would then be able to do the film?
Or did he have the foresight that he could wait beyond her having the child, with the confidence that she would not be among those women whose looks are adversely affected by pregnancy at least for a few years?
Could the writers have tried to add at least a drop of believability in the track at some point, rather than induce so much clunk at every point and phase that they have made previous tracks look comparatively less clunky?
What a sledgehammeringly forced chain of events just so that miscarriage can be quickly induced with the excuse of conflict.
Every sympathy-gambit consistently and invariably evoking no mass-audience sympathetic support for the intended sympathy-beneficiary in every consecutive track since there is benefit transparently predictable immediately beyond the downside.
Edited by leelaa9 - 11 years ago