A very interesting conversation Between Duryodhan and Bhanumati - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

14

Views

42.5k

Users

6

Likes

21

Frequent Posters

rasyafan thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: shivpriya

Yes, Duryodhan's birth was considered inauspicious. Bcoz when his pot was opened and the baby was taken out , several dogs surrounded the palace and started wailing out loudly. This was an ill- omen, and so Vidur's suggestion was to discard this baby only. But Gandhari didn't do so as he was her first-born. As far as I knw this ill-omen didn't occur during the births of rest of the kauravas. So the whole flesh that gandhari once carried inside her womb was not evil but a part of it was certainly evil and that part was born as Duryodhana. And being the eldest he definitely had the potential to influence his younger siblings, turning them into evil as well.



exactly Shivpriya 👏 beautifully explained 😊
Wistfulness thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Banner Contest Winner Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 11 years ago
#12
I remember reading Duryodhan was actually Kali Rakshas and Shakuni was Dwapara.
daenerysnow thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#13
I agree with a comment made about passing judgement and being conditioned to think in terms of only good and evil in differentiating beings. Its a basic way of thinking that ignores the totality of a humans worth.
I read somewhere myself about how Duryodhana compared to the average human nowadays was a better human and that is very telling of this Kali Yuga.
Everything that composited the better side of his being is insurmountable because it was a different yuga altogether. Never mind Arjuna or Vidhur, the average person cant equate to just one good act Duryodhans. Who are we indeed in comparison?
You come to read comments where people are very quick to judge evil, label and target the person of the ancient era who committed a sin and tainted their life without comprehending the ambiguity of Dharma and how it affects each and every person, and this is very common in our age of hypocrisy. I do not in any way intend to glorify Duryodhana, every mistake he made ate away a piece of his humanity but nor should I partake in completely downgrading him due to that, his good qualities had accumulated which we could not even try to overcome through our own life unless you are saintly or truly live a pious, authentic life..
That is why Mahabharat interests us so much, its characters, all of them, contain both the bad and good in them, some more, some less. One act of goodness and worth/capability cannot be equated, we are no match to the relentless determination that Karna had defying against all odds thrown in his path, the limitless generosity of Duryodhan, the earnest, courageous and fine skill of Arjuna, the strength and resilience of Draupadi, just to name a few characters, they were not ordinary but yet retained something that is relatable to every human being to some degree, and compels us to review and reflect on decisions that we make, actions that we take in our life
shivpriya thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: -Shruti

I remember reading Duryodhan was actually Kali Rakshas and Shakuni was Dwapara.

I didn't know that ...how come ?
Sweet_Krishna thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#15
Duryodhana had another wife called Lakshmanaa, princess of Kalinga, who was abducted by Karn from her swayamvar for Duryodhana.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".