Superpower...Is this necessary?

First it was Germany in Hitler's era...now it is America..

I was thinking if the super-ness of a particular country was necessary for world? I mean.. all this atomic race and economic development is done for either establishing the dream of being SuperPower or for --- what???😕 If America has got atomic weapons then Japan has got the economic giant weapon😕 Is this development just for being number one all the time?😕

Why it is necessary to have a One-Country rule? Why in History we have seen the same again and again... Why humans support this image so much?

Your comments.😊

Originally posted by: MNMS

First it was Germany in Hitler's era...now it is America..

I was thinking if the super-ness of a particular country was necessary for world? I mean.. all this atomic race and economic development is done for either establishing the dream of being SuperPower or for --- what???😕 If America has got atomic weapons then Japan has got the economic giant weapon😕 Is this development just for being number one all the time?😕

Every country wants to be the best in some area or the other. Development is that race to be the best of all the countries. To be the Superpower is any country's dream (not just in military, it may be in economy, arts, banking, scientific research) and to persue that you have to have development. So, yeah the ultimate goal of development is to be the numero uno.

Why it is necessary to have a One-Country rule?

It is not necessary to have a One-Country rule, it is important for 'that' country to have a One-Country rule. Did I make any sense??

Why in History we have seen the same again and again... Why humans support this image so much?

As long as you get to be the dictator will you oppose dictatorship?? Same thing applies for the countries as well, as long as they are the Superpower why would they dislike the concept. As for the other not so fortunate countries they don't have any choice other than to accept the Superpower and try to become one some day.

Originally posted by: MNMS

I think i couldn't explain my point properly 😕

I wanted to say that why it is necessary to have a superPower in world... not that why a particular "Country" wants to be a superPower.

It is not necessary to have a Superpower but since every country tries to be the best you will end up having one.

My question is not on the ambition of the country to be one, instead I am asking the credibility of such a "Position" 😊

Well countries that matter obey the Superpower and countries that don't matter wouldn't dare to disobey the Superpower. So, what can be more credible.

Originally posted by: MNMS

First it was Germany in Hitler's era...now it is America..

I was thinking if the super-ness of a particular country was necessary for world? I mean.. all this atomic race and economic development is done for either establishing the dream of being SuperPower or for --- what???😕 If America has got atomic weapons then Japan has got the economic giant weapon😕 Is this development just for being number one all the time?😕

Everyone wants to be King just like all preaching and no followers. Being able to determine the course of other countries is a way to acknowledge your own mighty power. The trap is laid by cosseting first and punishing later. It becomes necessary once your own country has reached a level of self sustainability and now you look for supremacy over all.

Why it is necessary to have a One-Country rule? Why in History we have seen the same again and again... Why humans support this image so much?

The necessity arises from the very desire to prove self significant in world affairs and acquire the Superpower title which enables in giving legitimacy to whimsical actions and hidden agenda of gaining other's assests.

Your comments.😊