khrhun_sheen thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#1

Rent-a-womb trend fuels surrogate debate

American couples head to India for cheaper fertility services

MUMBAI, India - Jyoti Dave is pregnant, but when the 30-year-old gives birth in March the baby will not be taken home to bond with her other child, but will instead be handed over to an American couple unable to conceive.

For her trouble, the Indian surrogate mother will be paid. She won't say how much, but she says it's money she desperately needs to feed her poor family after an industrial accident left the family's only breadwinnner unable to work.

"My husband lost his limbs working in the factory," Dave told Reuters. "We could not manage even a meal a day. That is when I decided to rent out my womb."

Surrogate motherhood is among the latest in a long list of roles being outsourced to India, where rent-a-womb services are far cheaper than in the West.

"In the U.S. a childless couple would have to spend anything up to $50,000," Gautam Allahbadia, a fertility specialist who helped a Singaporean couple obtain a child through an Indian surrogate last year, told Reuters.

"In India, it's done for $10,000-$12,000."

Fertility clinics usually charge $2,000-$3,000 for the procedure while a surrogate is paid anything between $3,000 and $6,000, a fortune in a country with an annual per capita income of around $500.

But the practice is not without its critics in India with some calling it the "commoditization of motherhood" and an exploitation of the poor by the rich.

"It's true I'm doing this for money, but is it also not true that a childless couple is benefiting?" said Rituja, a surrogate mother in Mumbai, who declined to give her full name.

Money meets convenience
For the surrogates — usually lower middleclass housewives — money is the primary motivator.

For their clients it's infertility or — some claim — educated working women turning to hired wombs to avoid a pregnancy affecting careers.

But there is also a social dimension to their service, an empathy with the childless in a society that views reproduction as a sacred obligation, and believes good deeds performed in this life are rewarded in the next one, experts say.

"Surrogate mothers are giving their (the eventual parents') lives a new meaning. For them the money they pay is just a token gesture that by no way substitutes their gratefulness," said Deepak Kabir, a Mumbai-based gynecologist.

While there are no official figures it's estimated between 100-150 surrogate babies are born each year in India, though the number of failed attempts is likely to be far higher.

Yashodhara Mhatre, a fertility consultant at Mumbai's Center for Human Reproduction, says that while there are no comprehensive figures available perhaps 500-600 surrogate babies are born each year throughout the world.

Interest at the Dr. L.H. Hiranandani Hospital where she works is doubling every year, she says.

Allahbadia is presently handling 14 cases with prospective parents from India, Britain, the U.S., Singapore, France, Portugal and Canada.

India has no laws regulating the fertility industry — only nonbinding guidelines issued by the country's medical research council — but specialists say they have set their own criteria: only childless couples who cannot have a successful pregnancy themselves.

A surrogate must be young, healthy and married with children for physical, and more importantly, psychological support. A mother is less likely to want to keep a surrogate baby if she already has her own children.

In India, the egg is usually from the intended mother or a donor to reduce chances of the surrogate developing an emotional attachment to the baby, doctors say.

Both parties sign a contract under which the couple pay for the surrogate's services and her medical care and the latter renounces her right to the baby, precluding chances of a possible custody battle later.

Some think the industry must be more tightly controlled.

"Every pregnancy and birth is associated with some health risk," C.P. Puri, director of National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, told Reuters.

"We must not promote surrogacy as a trade."

Taboo despite trend
Media hype surrounding a 47-year-old grandmother who delivered twins for her daughter in 2004 at a clinic in the small town of Anand in western Gujarat state made many Indians aware of surrogacy for the first time.

Since then, Anand, known as the milk capital of India after a hugely successful dairy cooperative, has emerged as the epicenter of the industry with about 20 women signed up as surrogate mothers for couples from abroad.

Some of them are having a second go. At least seven surrogate mothers will deliver later this year.

Surrogacy as a temp job may be a lucrative deal but traditional attitudes to sex and procreation, especially in the countryside, mean Indian surrogate mothers often invent cover stories for their neighbors.

Most say they are carrying their husband's child, and once the baby is delivered to the intended parents, they say the newborn has died. Some go to other towns and return after delivery, telling neighbors they were visiting relatives.

"It's a lie we have to tell, otherwise how can we earn this much money?" said a 29-year-old prospective mother at a Mumbai clinic. "A lie told for a good cause is not a sin."

I found this article on MSN just now, your views?? If it has been posted then please close this.

I will post my views later!

-Sheen

Edited by khrhun_sheen - 19 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

17

Views

1.1k

Users

8

Frequent Posters

mermaid_QT thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#2
Among others, this cheap outsourcing was predicted. It is not a shock to me.
I actually have no thoughts on this because the Indian girls (rental wombs) who go through a complicated and demanding process of gestation and parturition must definitely have their own reasons. As long as nobody cheats anyone, baby and mother is healthy & happy and the child is further taken good care of, who am I to judge?

Thanks for the article sheen.
bhilwara thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#3
Rent a Womb???
As expressed in kidney trading thread, my views are same: Lets's regulate the process and bump up the compensation. $6000 to surrogate mothers is a joke….its ridiculously low considering the outcome.
bhilwara thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#4

😊

Edited by bhilwara - 19 years ago
mermaid_QT thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: bhilwara

Rent a Womb???
As expressed in kidney trading thread, my views are same: Lets's regulate the process and bump up the compensation. $6000 to surrogate mothers is a joke….its ridiculously low considering the outcome.



You said it Bhilwara! It is low, but that's why it is outsourced 🤢🤢 where a mother thinks it is sufficient for her! Isn't that sad..

lighthouse thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: mermaid_QT



You said it Bhilwara! It is low, but that's why it is outsourced 🤢🤢 where a mother thinks it is sufficient for her! Isn't that sad..

Great point QT... The compensation is decided by the "market" though and it is not sad. An IT person or any worker in the USA makes many times more then their colleague in India.

Don't get me wrong but renting a womb has become a sellable commodity.

mittijalebi thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#7
its easy for some ppl to sit here and say that this is not right, not what god intended etc etc etc. but put yourself in that childless couple's shoes or of that mother's who worries about what to feed her children that evening....only then we will be able to understand that being a surrogate mother is not a bad thing.

as long as no one is getting hurt or played by anyone i'm all for it. 👏
mermaid_QT thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: mittijalebi

its easy for some ppl to sit here and say that this is not right, not what god intended etc etc etc. but put yourself in that childless couple's shoes or of that mother's who worries about what to feed her children that evening....only then we will be able to understand that being a surrogate mother is not a bad thing.

as long as no one is getting hurt or played by anyone i'm all for it. 👏



No one here said it was not right 😊. We all agree with you, if you read our posts.
mittijalebi thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#9
i know no one said it wasn't right. i was just making a point about those ppl who might think that its not right.
mermaid_QT thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#10
alright cool! 😃 we are still looking for opposition to strike a debate here then.. 😆 😆

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".