baby swapping - acceptable? DT note pg 5 - Page 4

Originally posted by: sk11

Baby swap wasn't done to save face for unmarried pregnant girl. Purvi was married to Onir already when swap happ. And purvi was about 7-8 months pregnant no? Wasn't onir and purvi planning to leave to have the child so no one would suspect such an early delivery for her?

Swap was done in this serial bc purvi was looking for "bhalyaai" as some say for Ovi and Arjun. She believed ovi would not and couldn't handle losing her baby. Which was utterly stupid decision on purvi part.

Not really. If that were the case, she could have easily gotten a slap on the wrist and gotten Arjun at the 1 month party drama when everyone found out Arovi never consummated etc. purvi could have easily said she was pregnant and Got Arjun. Instead she decided to leave and let Arovi be since ovi loved Arjun so much. If purvi wanted she could have gotten her happiness with Arjun by revealing the truth.

Anyways, after Purvi gave Pari to Ovi, how come nobody was shocked that Ovi's baby Pari was so big since she had premature delivery at 7 months? If they didnt wonder at Pari's size then they would not wonder or suspect if Purvi kept Pari and said she was 7 mths premature baby.

Originally posted by: sk11

Not really. If that were the case, she could have easily gotten a slap on the wrist and gotten Arjun at the 1 month party drama when everyone found out Arovi never consummated etc. purvi could have easily said she was pregnant and Got Arjun. Instead she decided to leave and let Arovi be since ovi loved Arjun so much. If purvi wanted she could have gotten her happiness with Arjun by revealing the truth.

Anyways, after Purvi gave Pari to Ovi, how come nobody was shocked that Ovi's baby Pari was so big since she had premature delivery at 7 months? If they didnt wonder at Pari's size then they would not wonder or suspect if Purvi kept Pari and said she was 7 mths premature baby.

I've never said purvi was right for baby swapping. I've only posted about what purvi said was her reasoning for giving her child to ovi. You said she swapped baby bc she was unmarried mom etc which is false. She did it for "bhalyaai" of Ovi and to keep Arovi marriage intact and so pari could be with her father from as shown from show.

You're allowed your opinions. If you feel she left to hide her face then that's your POV. But I dont believe she left for the sole reason of hiding from her mom bc of the backlash. I feel she left bc she could abort the child and wanted to keep it and couldn't stay in Mumbai either bc then Arovi marriage would end. That's my POV. As for sanskars, all parents provide them to their children in the hopes their child abides by them and makes the correct decisions but life doesn't always work that way. Some lessons you must learn from making mistakes.

Originally posted by: sk11

I've never said purvi was right for baby swapping. I've only posted about what purvi said was her reasoning for giving her child to ovi. You said she swapped baby bc she was unmarried mom etc which is false. She did it for "bhalyaai" of Ovi and to keep Arovi marriage intact and so pari could be with her father from as shown from show.

You're allowed your opinions. If you feel she left to hide her face then that's your POV. But I dont believe she left for the sole reason of hiding from her mom bc of the backlash. I feel she left bc she could abort the child and wanted to keep it and couldn't stay in Mumbai either bc then Arovi marriage would end. That's my POV. As for sanskars, all parents provide them to their children in the hopes their child abides by them and makes the correct decisions but life doesn't always work that way. Some lessons you must learn from making mistakes.

Well I'd rather go by what the CVs show then just mere claims. There can be a million interpretations.

Originally posted by: sk11

Well I'd rather go by what the CVs show then just mere claims. There can be a million interpretations.

Viewbies Note: Is everyone missing the part on Vijays' rules that says no bashing or attacking or mocking members for their views? Everyone is entitled to state their opinions. If you like them, great. If you dont, great. Discussing different views are fine so long as you respect you fellow members opinions and not mock them because they are different from yours. Making comments on ones personal life is not allowed either.

Originally posted by: -BadtameezDil-

Its so easy for you to Justify something that you once called wrong and disgusting just because its been played on your favourite..wow..

Originally posted by: ilovedhanjanird

What is your problem? why are you attacking me personally?

Get a life

PR DT