Cinematographers( Poets of Filmlight) - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

14

Views

3.4k

Users

1

Likes

1

Frequent Posters

*dolly* thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#11

Light/dark relationships

Every element in an image has a specific brightness. One area will be seen as bright, another will be perceived as dark. The visual 'weight' of different brightness levels will depend upon proximity, area and contrast. The eye is naturally attracted to the highlight areas in a frame, but the contrast and impact of an object's brightness in the frame will depend on the adjacent brightness levels. A shot of a polar bear against snow will require different compositional treatment than a polar bear in a zoo enclosure. A small bright object against a dark background will have as much visual weight in attracting the eye as a large bright object against a bright background. [Consider portraits of great masters.] The difference in the brightness levels within a frame plays an important role in balancing the composition.

For John Alton, the definitive Hollywood cameraman of the 'film noir' genre, black was the most important element in the shot. The most important lamps for him were the ones he did not turn on. The high key/low key mood of the frame will dictate the styles of composition as well as the atmosphere. A few strong light/dark contrasts can provide very effective visual designs.

Strong contrast creates a solid separation and good figure/ground definition. When size is equal, the light/dark relationship plays an essential part in deciphering which is figure and which is ground. Equal areas of light and dark can be perceived as either figure or ground. The boundary area of a shape often relies on a light/dark relationship. A figure can be separated from its background by backlighting its edges. [A backlight on my head will improve the definition of figure/ground and also create definition of the space.] A highlight in the frame will attract the eye and if it is not compositionally connected to the main subject of interest, it will compete and divert the attention of the viewer.

Harmony and contrast

Although, perception seeks visual unity/harmony, a detailed visual communication requires contrast to articulate its meaning. Morse code can be understood if the distinction between dot and dash is accentuated. A visual image requires the same accentuation of contrast in order to achieve coherent meaning. Light, by supplying contrast of tones, can remove visual ambiguity in a muddle of competing subjects, but a wrong tonal contrast can produce a confused and misleading 'message' - the dots and dashes come close to the same duration and are misread.

Communication

Communication is achieved by contrast. The communication carrier - sound or light provides a message by modulation. There is a need for polarities whether loud or soft, dark or light, dot or dash. [Or in this digital age presence or absence.] Meaning is made clear by comparison.

Light is the perfect medium for modulating contrast. It illuminates the subject and therefore the carrier of the message. Lighting technique, as applied in cinema, balances out and reduces the contrast ratio to fit the inherent limitations of the medium. It therefore contributes in the drive towards perceptual equilibrium by catering simplified images. But light is also needed to provide modelling, contrast and tonal differences. In this sense it introduces diversity and contrast while identifying meaning.

To many, it is also the very fundamental principle of existence. In the Chinese Taoist philosophy, it is described as the:

Yin and Yang

Yin n. [Dark] The feminine, negative, dark principle in nature, which interacts with its complement and opposite, yang.

Yang n. [Bright] The masculine, positive, bright principle in nature, which interacts with its complement, yin.

Now let us see the opening sequences of Andrei Tarkovsky's great film "STALKER". [Screening of Stalker for opening ten minutes.]

One thing I want to tell you is about the use of 'islands' of darkness and brightness, each used to emphasis the opposite. We see it used a lot in Murthy Sir's work, like in 'Kaagaz Ke Phool', 'Pyassa', 'Sahib Bibi or Gulam' etc. In one of Vivanji's paintings this technique was used to emphasis the ethereal morning light on the face of a young girl, with the island of dark clouds behind her face.]

[Let me also talk about a few things, which I left out or not remembered earlier. One of the contrastiest tonal occurrences is in our on eyes. It makes it best suited for easy communication and makes the eye most powerful. In India we even make it more evocative by applying kajol to the eyes. It is no wonder that the only one advice, which Wajda gives to cinematographers, is: "Don't forget to light the eyes of your actors and actresses." Another concept is about islands of darkness and brightness used within a frame to enhance the opposite. Few other things I would have liked to talk here were:

a: Fade In and Fade Out used as the passage of time
b: use of shadows on the faces in a night scene and day scene
c: light used as to create hidden, dark spaces as in thrillers
d: use of backlight as an 'invisible light'

Edited by Chalavanth - 18 years ago
*dolly* thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#12

POETS OF FILMLIGHT

The public is familiar with the names and faces of the many directors, actors, script writers, producers who, during the span of the last hundred years, have given it the most wonderful films. However, the names and faces of the directors of photography, those true magicians, poets of the light, have rarely become well known, as these artist tend to remain discretely in the background.

Jrn Kjr Nilsen, Kopenhagen, Denmark, 1995

Slawomir Idziak, Warsaw, Poland, 1999

Edited by Chalavanth - 18 years ago
*dolly* thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#13

Subrata Mitra

LIGHT OF INDIAN CINEMA

" Mitra revolutionized prevailing aesthetics in Indian cinematography with innovations designed to make light in film both more realistic and poetic.he was perhaps the first cinematographer to use bounce lighting consistently -ahead of Raoul Coutard in France and Sven Nykvist in Sweeden."

Subrata Mitra lights the lamp.


Edited by Chalavanth - 18 years ago
*dolly* thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#14

Story of Subrata Mitra

This may sound like a fairytale but it is all true. I am almost sure that no cinematographer has ever started his career as I did or suddenly became a director of photography overnight at the age of twenty one without going to a film school or assisting a cameraman or even touching a movie camera before - and that too a film which was later considered by many to be one of the best films of all times!

I was born on 12 October 1930 in a middle class bengali family of a rather mixed pedigree. My mother came from an orthodox Hindu Family who lived in a big mansion with huge pillars like we see in Jalsaghar. That was were I was born. My mother's grandfather was once very rich but all that I saw of his fortune was his gentle and sober aristocracy. My mother's father and his brother were amateur painters who had for sometime learnttheir art from Abanindranath Tagore. One of their cousins, a world famous champion wresteler, asked my mother to send me to his gymnasium as he saw a petential wresteler in me when I was ten or twelve. I went there for a few days, watched the wreselers, drank a very tasty almond sherbat and suddenly vanished for ever when the time came for me to actually wrestle.
I was a great favourite of my paternal grandmother who pampered me a lot when I was a child. She came from a completely different background. Her father was a great scholar, was in the Indian Civil Service and a very high ranking officer in the British Raj. His family was highly anglicized, most of them always spoke in English, could not eat with their fingers and a few carried forks and knives in their pocket when invited to a typical Bengali Hindu wedding to tackle the food served on banana leaves. My grandmother, who was the eldest of the ten children and had accompanied her parents to England when she was young, was an exception - probably because of my grandfather who was born in a rather poor family and was very bengali. As he was a brilliant medical student, his friends somehow managed to collect just his passage money. He sailed for London secretly without telling his parents as it was sacrilegious for a Hindu to cross the seas and required him to perform penance by eating cowdung in those days. His studies depended totally on the scholarships. He stood first everytime.
He was the first Indian to obtain the MBBS degree from London. When he was about to get his MD, he received a telegram from home saying that his mother was very seriously ill. He rushed back home with a sense of guilt, just to find that his mother was sweeping the courtyard. There was no other way for the parents to get back their son. Though I have received quite a few awards and medals myself, the only medal I am really proud of is one of my grandfather's gold medals from London University dated 1886-7. He was an absent-mided professor, scientist and a physician who quite often wore socks of different colours and was also an atheist.
Discovering Cinema
Little I did know that my habitual cycling down with schoolmates to a nearby cinema for the sunday morning shows, to watch the British and Hollywood films from the lowest priced seats, would secretly decide my fate.
Once I had begun watching films, I was making discoveries and learning in the process. To recount the story of my learning, among the first few things that facinated me was the lowkey photography of Great Expectations [1946] and Oliver twist [1948], both shot by Guy Greene for David Lean, and The Third Man [1949] shot by Robert Krasker for Carol Reed. I would not have thought of choosing to be a cinematographer had I not seen these films, or Monsieur Vincent [1947] shot by Claude Renoir for Maurice Cloche. They haunted me all the time and the urge to become a cameraman was sown.
While in college, I wavered between the options of becoming an architect or a cinematographer. But failing to find as a camera assistant, I reluctantly continued studying for my science degree. Then Jean Renoir, came to my rescue, when he arrived in Calcutta in 1950 to shoot The River. I tried to get a job on the film but was turned down. My parents were always supportive of my creative pursuits, and father stepped in like an anxious parent trying to get his child admitted into a school. He took me top the producer, the director and his cinematographer cousin - Claude Renoir. I was given permission to watch the shooting. Every day I travelled two hours by bus across the city to shooting of The River . I made extensive notes and meticulous diagrams detailing the lighting, the movement of camera and actors. One day Jean Renoir discovered me making notes and wabnted to see my notebook. He was quite excited to see it, called Claude immediately and showed it to him. To my great delight, Claude one day asked if he could refer to my notes to check lighting continuity before doing a retake. I don't think that I learned much about film making as such from the shooting of The River. But, I could see that film making aws like a religion to Jean and Claude Renoir. And as I watched these two masters at work, I got intiated into that religion.
Meanwhile, Satyajit Ray, at the time a graphic designer and a friend of Bansichandragupta, the film's art director, would visit the set on Sundays and holidays to watch the shooting. We became friends, and I would visit him everyday, describe in great detail what I had witnessed and also show him the stills I had taken on the shooting.
One day he told me, 'You have the perfect eye now.'
A Cinematographer overnight
Ray was already planning Pather Panchali, and promised to take me on as one of the assistants. But things were moving very slowly to the making of Pather Panchali. After a few months, as the shooting approched, he suddenly suggested, 'Why don't you photograph the film?' 'Me? I don't know a thing!' I replied. 'What is there to know?' he asked. 'There is a switch on the camera. You press it, the camera runs and everything else is the same as with your still camera.' And to everybody's amazement and disapproval, the scepticism of relations and friends, nothing to speak about the professionals who had only banter and sarcasm for us, Ray stuck to his choice. He was perhaps prompted at least partly by his own apprehensions about having to work with established professionals. But that could not be his only reason. He must have come to feel confident That I would delever the goods. And so, at 21, I became a director of photography, without ever having touched a movie camera before.


Edited by Chalavanth - 18 years ago
*dolly* thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#15

Filmography

1. Pather Panchali [dir. Styajit Ray] Bengali 1955

2.Aparajito [dir. Styajit Ray] Bengali 1956
3. Paras Pathar [dir. Satyajit Ray] Bengali 1957
4. Jalsaghar [dir. Stayajit Ray] Bengali 1958
5. Apur Sansar [dir. Satyajit Ray] Bengali 1959
6. Devi [dir. Satyajit Ray] Bengali 1960
7. Kanchanjangha [dir. Satyajit Ray] Bengali 1962
8. The Householder [dir.James Ivory] English 1962
9. Mahanagar [dir. Stayajit Ray] Bengali 1963
10. Charulatha [dir. Satyajit Ray] Bengali 1964
11. Shakespearwala [dir. James Ivory] English 1964
12. Teesri Kasam [dir. Basu Bhattacharya] Hindi 1965
13. Nayak [dir. Satyajit Ray] Bengali 1966
14. The Arch [dir. Cecile Tang] Cantonese 1967
15. The Guru [dir. James Ivory] English 1968
16. Bombay Talkie [dir. James Ivory] English 1970
17. An August Requiem [dir. Victor Banerjee] English 1980
18. Nehru [dir. Yuri Aldhokin/Shyam Benegal] Multi lingual 1984
19. New Delhi Times [dir.Ramesh Sharma] Hindi 1985


Short Films:


1. Mahatma and the Mad Boy [dir.Ismail Merchant] English 1971
2. Rumtek [dir. Ramesh Sharma] English 1978


Music Credits:


1. The River [dir. Jean Renoir] 1950 English - Composed and played solo sitar title
music.
2. Pather Panchali [dir. Satyajit Ray] 1955 Bengali - Composed and played additional sitar pieces.


Edited by Chalavanth - 18 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".