sID wiLL be poSITIve agAIN-- - Page 11

Originally posted by: jee_23

😛 😛 😛
guys... hv fun by debating

join us yaar- haha😆😆

Originally posted by: navtour

ill again DEBUNK som of teh points above--

1st-- i never thought that DEVDAS was ever associated with crying-- it was always DRINKING--

2nd-- PSYCHO is a very harsh and strong word to be used to a normal person-- PSYCHO is a person afflicted with PSYCHOTIC-- its very far from MEMORY LOSS--

and lastly--what is "GOOD HUMANITY"--

i dont think theres an exact definition for that--

and who dictates all the definitions--

isnt that society where in STANDARDS are set to be followed by people--

if ONE person refuse to follow these STANDARDS-- does that make him PSYCHO-- or does it make a person ABNORMAL--

dont worry STAR2ji-- im not angry-- i love DEBATES--

im happy to meet a person like u to whom i can argue with some biases--

hehe continue it yaar--

im really having fun debating with u--

cheers!
naV😆

ok dear navji i am ready to debate on sid and only on him.

ok i am giving my explanation towards good humanity,humanity is a "state of being a persoon "and i gave it because ,people with good intentions can only make up a good society.

it is not that devdas only drinks he even cries thats what i have mentioned.

and coming to PSYCHO ,

i am not saying that people who does not follw the standards of society are psycho's ,i am only saying that they are not good persons.And i have mentioned this only for sid,because this is thread on sid's character.

the persons are also called psycho's who harasses others mentally.i think i have given a small word for him because psycho mentallities can be cured with treatment where as in the case of sid it is difficult to catch the problem with him ,because these sort of psycho's are sweet to outside and very much cruel inside.if u want i will explain .

😃😃😃

wow! finally someone else are fighting, sorry, debating in this forum.😆😆😆 lols! it is really fun to see this! please continue!😉

Originally posted by: star2

ok dear navji i am ready to debate on sid and only on him.

ok i am giving my explanation towards good humanity,humanity is a "state of being a persoon "and i gave it because ,people with good intentions can only make up a good society.

it is not that devdas only drinks he even cries thats what i have mentioned.

and coming to PSYCHO ,

i am not saying that people who does not follw the standards of society are psycho's ,i am only saying that they are not good persons.And i have mentioned this only for sid,because this is thread on sid's character.

the persons are also called psycho's who harasses others mentally.i think i have given a small word for him because psycho mentallities can be cured with treatment where as in the case of sid it is difficult to catch the problem with him ,because these sort of psycho's are sweet to outside and very much cruel inside.if u want i will explain .

ow debunking time again-- so here it goes--

1--on ur statement of GOOD HUMANITY is the state of being a good person--
SID fall for a wrong person-- and i agree that it was not right-- but how come that act made SID bad OVER ALL--

i mean we're talking about SID as a whole-- meaning his whole persona and attitude--

2-- ya DEVDAS also cried but why only compare SID with DEVDAS-- there a lot of people who cries-- then y only to DEVDAS-- i dont get the connection between the 2--

3-- u said : the persons are also called psycho's who harasses others mentally.i think i have given a small word for him because psycho mentallities can be cured with treatment where as in the case of sid it is difficult to catch the problem with him ,because these sort of psycho's are sweet to outside and very much cruel inside.if u want i will explain .

now-- when did SID HARRASED anyone MENTALLY--- i think it was TANISHA who had done that to him--

and how come u know that SID is very much CRUEL inside--

ya its really UNEXPLAINABLE to state what were the reasons that SID turned negative on past episodes--

but calling him PSYCHO is still out of the story--

i can EXPLAIN more if u want

cheers!
naV

once again im telling i have compared sid to devdas only because of sid's crying because devdas cried for his love n this sid is only onesided .
coming to psyco i am still on my ponit.
let me explain you his harrasment towards AKSHAY mentally ,
1]showing Akshay's watch to him intentionally, at that time when akshay feels sad this sid felt happy showig a wicked smile.dont this is called a harresment.
2]then at one scene he intentionally cuts his hand ,after a big scene created by him when akshay calls mamta to come with him he calls her and says "thank u mamta".what does his expressions to akshay mean then, when mamta is dressing his cut .he does all those to make akshay feel bad is'nt it?
not only these two there are lots,
then u have asked me where u found his cruelty
on mamta's b'day party he is the person who wants to celebrate her bday without her family naa,while it was a party arranged by akshay is'nt it?at that time he was not influnced by tanisha.

tanisha is a very small person when compare to this sid, her villan brain was nothing in sepatating AM,what all misundestandings came between AM only bcoz of this sid n no one can denay this fact.
we havent seen tanisha harrasing sid mentally.
iam surprised to see him still crying for a married woman who gave him a tight slap.
he is not at all feeling ashamed for treating Akshay with such a behaviour.then how come one can call sid as a positve person now.