FG vs SaReGaMaPa CHLG 2005

Hey,

when you compare saregam chlg 2005 to fame gurukul....none of the FG contestants can make place at least in the final 48 of saregama chlg 2005.

in other words saregam is far better than FG...all are good and fantastic singers in saregama....i am not just praising..but if we all are wanting to see good singers then FG is a very wrong place and wrong projection for the contestant future..

FACT:Arpita nd shammit are both disqualified in the primilinary rounds of saregama chlg 2005. even shammit was shown in the starting hugging someone who got selected.

so the fact of FG is they do not want just singers...but also a good performer...which either one is lacking in all the contestants..

personally watching both the competetion but chlg 2005 tops than FG..which lacks in concentration "what they really want to make and achive"

what do you say????

i agree to an extent. saregamapa challenge 2005 is looking for singing talent only and those guys are wonderful singers, they probably are better than these people in fame gurukul but it's not fair to say that people in FG are not talented infact they r gr8 performers.

Originally posted by: khaprakanika

i agree to an extent. saregamapa challenge 2005 is looking for singing talent only and those guys are wonderful singers, they probably are better than these people in fame gurukul but it's not fair to say that people in FG are not talented infact they r gr8 performers.

for an extent NO, all of them lach either one of them..either singing or performance. the audiance prooved it voting again and again to QAZI...

who cares....i like to watch Fame Gurukul...i am just addicted to it....(so i like FG)infact i love it....

no offence please just the facts....well FG is addictive too..because it is far better than EKTA KAPOOR's KKHUSUM, JJKN and so so tears wala's..yeha pe b teras ka kami nahe hai...love affair ka kami nahe hai....saahse ka b kami nahe hai(Ila Ji)..sab hai...

The singers in sa re ga ma pa are more talented than the singers from FG. While SRGMP focuses only on singing, FG focuses more on the "X factor."

Definately agree with you on that one Selina. FG is more focused on creating a "pop idol" (with the X factor) rather than a playback singer, which is more a focus of Saregama.

Originally posted by: texasguy

Hey,

when you compare saregam chlg 2005 to fame gurukul....none of the FG contestants can make place at least in the final 48 of saregama chlg 2005.

in other words saregam is far better than FG...all are good and fantastic singers in saregama....i am not just praising..but if we all are wanting to see good singers then FG is a very wrong place and wrong projection for the contestant future..

FACT:Arpita nd shammit are both disqualified in the primilinary rounds of saregama chlg 2005. even shammit was shown in the starting hugging someone who got selected.

so the fact of FG is they do not want just singers...but also a good performer...which either one is lacking in all the contestants..

personally watching both the competetion but chlg 2005 tops than FG..which lacks in concentration "what they really want to make and achive"

what do you say????

i agree 100%. never knew that arpita n shammit were in it

Ur right, but then u also notice that FG is a more modernised program where the main focus is on film songs, where as Sa Re Ga Ma Pa Challenge is focused on a variety so songs. As singers, I feel the Sa Re Ga Ma Pa Challenge is better, but as an actual program, I find FG more entertaining

i can't compare both i love both but i wait more for fg because we are watching them more and want to know more and more and know more things about singers and these shows are for entertainment and i get 100%.