its not SR its gonna b R***!!

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

bindu

@bangalores

Rocker

+ 6

Posted: 12 years ago

#81

i strongly feel CON will not happen...
if you take the time the promo was released , just when all were hyped abt SR... to avoid the drop in TRP when it does not 😉
now most of us will be happy if CON does not happen..because else madhu will be conned by the CON😆😆😆

Edited by bangalores - 12 years ago

Quote

840216

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#82

MR.hurr madhu asked firstly. so my points stands

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

840216

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#83

Originally posted by: M.Hurr

Both are willing,not only madhu.

nopz madhu wanted it

Quote

Mandy

@BeyondHorizon

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 12 years ago

#84

Originally posted by: ~~ashi~~
I don't think most people arguing that it's not rape getting the point here ...! YES , it's consensual . No one is denying that ..! But sex/ love making is happening with one of the parties making false promises to another ..! An act like that IS considered something along like lines of rape in the eyes of Indian Law no matter how much people scream " SHUT UP" or it grosses all of us out ..! Anyone here a lawyer ..? Can you shed some light on it ?

Does anyone remember the (in)famous Madhur Bhandarkar -Preeti Jain case ..? Sex was consensual YET he was slapped with charges of rape ..! Argument - The man had promised her a career after that which he clearly didn't ...!

THATS what people are talking about .. NOT whether Madhu gives in willingly or not .. Because Ofcourse she does ... She's more willing than RK in this case ..!

Its called taking undue advantage not RAPE. If anything is forced on u, its called violation not otherwise. In this case it wont be RAPE but its a plain case of being cheated upon

Preeti Jain wasn entirely innocent in this matter. She shd have realised the pros n cons before getting into the arrangement. There's no point drawing similarities here as its a completely diff scenario. I agree all u guys r upset but tat doesn mean u shout out calling it a RAPE. If u make a false promise n sleep with someone it isn called rape. At the end of the day, an adult is accountable for his/her actions. If somebody forces it on u, be it anybody even a husband or an outsider tats called a rape!

Quote

Sid

@Get-Lost

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#85

Originally posted by: nebuna

the problem is not only rape here
but this girl is taken for a ride emotionally and physically
how could this be love from both sides
rk is taking advantage of her completely

and people justifying rk😲

Dear, we are justifying RK because he is not wrong here!

Believe me, if RK was wrong here, we would have the first ones.. to bash him! But he is not!
If he was a rapist.. he would have raped her a long time back.. and Madhu would have not minded.. but he didn't do it!!

And dear, those who are calling us biased.. go and watch the precap again... It was Madhu who asked to bed her...! So its not a rape!😡

Quote

bindu

@bangalores

Rocker

+ 6

Posted: 12 years ago

#86

exactly what is going to happen if it is going to happen... he beds her... no love involved from his side to say union of souls as mentioned in one of the other posts

"Aaaj kissi bhi baat ke liye inkaar nahi karoongi"

and yeah i don't think she wanted him to bed her, but rather make love... hope you get the difference

Edited by bangalores - 12 years ago