You know as much as many members of the Forum want to see Jagya and Ganga union, and by the way CVs is projecting who knows that may well be the plan, I will have a problem with it. Why should we always show a woman as a bechari? Battered by Ratan and picked up by Jagya ? She herself does not have any asthithva? The whole idea is so demeaning that for a woman to be protected and for her to feel secure she must oblige a man whether there is love or not whether she wants or not.
Ganga has been shown as a fiery character and she will fight for her son, she should be allowed to be herself, given a job, trained in whatever, making Lijjat papad if so be it, she is a proud woman whatever she is, but for us to make her someone's concubine so that she gets her rotis and protection is somewhat insulting to the women I have known and admired and loved.
This one is from my heart, no puns, no leg pulling, straight, that is what I think