Its not Sridevi's Loss!

Shaitan-Haiwan thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail 13th Anniversary Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 12 years ago
#1
Its very saddening for me to see a legend like Sridevi to be ignored for her brillant and flawless performance in English Vinglish. I remember watching the movie and thinking...wow what natural and real acting! There was something very real about her performance.
I really admire Vidya and Priyanka, I actually really like them a lot. They did amazing Kahani and Barfi, but EV was something else. Sridevi is something else, she is a living legend! During her peak she was often cited as the female Amitabh Bachchan.
I really feel sorry for the industry for not recognizing her talent and worth. Its very saddening and if I was a woman in the film industry, I would find this demoralizing. Sridevi's loss just proves that the industry only appreciates actresses during their peak. After 20 years Vidya and Priyanka are going to experience the same thing.
Sridevi's win, would not only represent victory for her own talent, it would have symbolized a victory for all of the female actresses in the industry. The oldest winner of the best actress award, is Nutan, back in 1978 when she was 42 years old. At that time the film industry was not about glamour and it was not as competiive and race-rat-like as it is today. There was not much competition for Nutan at that time, so her win makes sense. After that its been downhill, all the awards have become all about young hot-shot actresses winning and the whole who knows who game.
Sridevi could have created history. Her victory could have changed the game, it could have taken a step in the right direction, it could have given motivation to all the actress then even at age 50, it is possible! Her win could have made a huge social statement. The impact of it would've been massive. But no,in the year 2013, we still take a step back and support regressive thinking.
All I can say is Sridevi's loss at the awards, is not a loss for English Vinglish, Gauri, or Sridevi...Its a loss for the industry and I really feel sorry for Bollywood.
Edited by Shaitan-Haiwan - 12 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

133

Views

12.9k

Users

44

Likes

596

Frequent Posters

643898 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#2
Getting snubbed at one or 2 function is tolerable but getting snubbed at every function is pathetic 👎🏼 if amitabh can win awards post 50 so why cant sridevi ?? sexist BW🤢
816870 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: _NaughtyBoy_

Getting snubbed at one or 2 function is tolerable but getting snubbed at every function is pathetic
👎🏼 if amitabh can win awards post 50 so why cant sridevi ?? sexist BW🤢



Filmfare gave Vidya her wedding gift
Shaitan-Haiwan thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail 13th Anniversary Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 12 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: rambo_rajkumar



Filmfare gave Vidya her wedding gift

It honestly seems like that.
But also, round of applause for Sridevi, whose so confident and graceul to STILL attend these events while being snubbed. I applaud her dignity and self-respect 👏
643898 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: rambo_rajkumar



Filmfare gave Vidya her wedding gift


i am fine with that 😆 but sridevi should have got the critics award IMO GOW was manoj and nawaz's film !
Kal El thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#6
At least the critics award should have gone to her. Pathetic! 👎🏼
NoThanks thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#7
Haven't people understood already that awards for films in India have no meaning and value at all?

From National to any Tom Dick and Harry award they come up with these days.

If Katrina,Salman and Saif can get an award then please I beg talented people like SriD and rest to stay away from them.


642126 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#8
Whole of media has been very unfair to Sridevi! Even at Hello Hall of Fame Awards, I think it was an insult to give Sridevi just a Performance of the year award while inventing a Timeless icon award for Madhuri and giving it to her for nothing (I mean what did she do this year?)!

Other awards have been no better. They give awards to Kajol just for doing a film (don't tell me K3G was an award worthy performance or MNIK was great shakes!) whereas Sridevi gets ignored totally? So many style icon/diva/legend or other awards can be invented for bimbos on the spot. Why no honour to Sridevi?

Show me any other actress whose comeback film has been so successful critically and commercially, without a big banner, big hero, and without much pre-release media hype! That too at age of 50! Most females do art films or hollow films like Aaja Nachle after a certain age. Sridevi managed a rare feat of giving a sensitive yet entertaining film. I am glad for Gauri Shinde winning all best debut director awards. But ashamed at award juries for ignoring Sridevi!

It's all about PR and buttering the jury then?

Actors keep getting awards even at 60+ whereas women have 20s or 30s as age limit?! Why this bias and glass ceiling here?

Vidya Balan is among the best in current generation but there's no need to pretend she's an all time great or possesses unsurpassed talent.
Posted: 12 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: Skepblun

Whole of media has been very unfair to Sridevi! Even at Hello Hall of Fame Awards, I think it was an insult to give Sridevi just a Performance of the year award while inventing a Timeless icon award for Madhuri and giving it to her for nothing (I mean what did she do this year?)!

Other awards have been no better. They give awards to Kajol just for doing a film (don't tell me K3G was an award worthy performance or MNIK was great shakes!) whereas Sridevi gets ignored totally? So many style icon/diva/legend or other awards can be invented for bimbos on the spot. Why no honour to Sridevi?

Show me any other actress whose comeback film has been so successful critically and commercially, without a big banner, big hero, and without much pre-release media hype! That too at age of 50! Most females do art films or hollow films like Aaja Nachle after a certain age. Sridevi managed a rare feat of giving a sensitive yet entertaining film. I am glad for Gauri Shinde winning all best debut director awards. But ashamed at award juries for ignoring Sridevi!

It's all about PR and buttering the jury then?

Actors keep getting awards even at 60+ whereas women have 20s or 30s as age limit?! Why this bias and glass ceiling here?

Vidya Balan is among the best in current generation but there's no need to pretend she's an all time great or possesses unsurpassed talent.


They invented one on SRK and can you believe Katrina
-Mmmmm- thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: Skepblun

Whole of media has been very unfair to Sridevi! Even at Hello Hall of Fame Awards, I think it was an insult to give Sridevi just a Performance of the year award while inventing a Timeless icon award for Madhuri and giving it to her for nothing (I mean what did she do this year?)!

Other awards have been no better. They give awards to Kajol just for doing a film (don't tell me K3G was an award worthy performance or MNIK was great shakes!) whereas Sridevi gets ignored totally? So many style icon/diva/legend or other awards can be invented for bimbos on the spot. Why no honour to Sridevi?


Show me any other actress whose comeback film has been so successful critically and commercially, without a big banner, big hero, and without much pre-release media hype! That too at age of 50! Most females do art films or hollow films like Aaja Nachle after a certain age. Sridevi managed a rare feat of giving a sensitive yet entertaining film. I am glad for Gauri Shinde winning all best debut director awards. But ashamed at award juries for ignoring Sridevi!

It's all about PR and buttering the jury then?

Actors keep getting awards even at 60+ whereas women have 20s or 30s as age limit?! Why this bias and glass ceiling here?

Vidya Balan is among the best in current generation but there's no need to pretend she's an all time great or possesses unsurpassed talent.




Word!!!

Kajol's mediocre work in MNIK was recognised but Sridevi's excellent perfomance this year was ignored everywhere...

Nepotism, biasness, sexism, and ageist attitude is rampant everywhere...


Related Topics

Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood

10 days ago

Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: Blood_Sacrifice

3 months ago

Sridevi or Madhuri - the bigger star during their respective primes?

Not asking about your fav or who was the better actress. Just asking who was more popular, the bigger superstar, and had more cultural impact...

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: cougarTown

4 months ago

How come Madz won BA for DTPH over Sridevi in Judaai?

Both released in 97. Both superhits. But no one can question that Madz was nothing award worthy in DTPH. And to give her an award in same year...

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: Sea-stars

5 months ago

Madhuri technically fantastic but Sridevi played with.....

Pankaj Parashar on Sridevi's 7th death anniversary: 'Saroj Khan said Madhuri Dixit is technically fantastic but Sridevi played with her face'....

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: Rosyme

5 months ago

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".