🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: Super8 - M52: IND vs WI🏏
🏏 ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: PAK vs SL,Super 8🏏
US, Israel attack Iran : Trump announces ‘major combat operations’🔥
MAIRA HELPS MUKTI 28.2
BAKING CLASSES 01.3
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: Super8 - M51: ZIM vs SA🏏
People are live streaming war
Rajpal Yadav Starts Social Media Channels
Originally posted by: Cyber123
Be honest guys.
Do you think that veer was a more interesting character before leap than after leap. With Nandish, he portrayed veer as a powerful and an intelligent character. But with Vikas, i just can't see the veer before leap in him. I think as well as they changed actors, they have also changed the character.Note: This is nothing to do with comparing Nandish and Vikas.
yup.. right yaar.😊Originally posted by: Shriya06
Veer was playful,romantic and strong while he was young..Nandish played it awesome..But Veer now is a powerful businessman and a responsible father..He found no love for past 19 years and struggled to know his past..He became weak in the time..And Vikas's acting as mature Veer is flawless..If Vikas tried to act like Nandish,I would not liked him..Both are good in their own way..And Vikas needs to be appreciated for doing the role brilliantly..