Is It FARE.. Mods Vs Members..? - Page 2

I don't mind following rules or regulations, but when those rules and regulations are taken off tangent to follow Mods' discretion, is when I lose my marbles. For example, We were told we can't talk about Mullah in the AT, hello, why the heck not, when the member in question do not have any issue, then why do Mods have to be so stringent about what goes in the ATs. When people start suppressing one's freedom to voice their opinions, that's when the forum starts to feel claustrophobic. It sometimes feel like stepping on a grenade while hitting that "post reply" button.

India Against Corruption has no connection here.

Members are asked to PM the problems, complain because posting on the forum does not solve anything but just make it a spectacle or for some members to gather support for their cause. It will only create more unnecessary issues with some members jumping in the topic to settle scores with the DT. In most cases every decision or action of DT will not be liked by all because members themselves have groups or likes and dislikes and in most cases their decisions are based on it. There always will be different view on each action taken. Hardly you will find all agreeing to it. Sadly everyone cannot be pleased as all have different opinions on each issue.

When members are given warnings raise or in majority cases even verbal warning that is done via PM and not on the forum to keep the members respect so that other members do not ridicule him or her. Like wise complains if any can be done via PM and not brought on open forum.

Topic Closed.

Regards,
BB6 DT