Guys, Padmini is finding it difficult to forgive even a repentant Mallick now for the same reason that she fled from her husband with her daughters.
Both times, it's about being a protective mother. Balraj would have killed Madhu. Mallick would have made Madhu a widow in her first few months of marriage.
Padmini has prayed for her evil husband's wellbeing. This is a woman to whom widowhood for her daughter is unthinkable.
And Mallick - who she considered herself united with in their feelings for the daughters - proved that he didn't even consider how socially, ritually and emotionally devastating it would be for their sanskaari conservative daughter Madhu.
Mallick only realized the facts after the third murder-attempt when RK pointed out to him how Madhu would react.
Mallick's actions would have been wrong but nevertheless understandable - but not if the daughter is Madhu.
Mallick recognized that RK was right in what he said about Madhu's reactions.
Divorce or separation would - if Madhu had not started to develop tender feelings for RK - have saved Madhu's life from being ruined.
But if her husband died so soon after marriage, then whether or not it was ever revealed that her father was the murderer, it would nevertheless have stigmatized Madhu for life.
People want to believe the worst about anyone for a moment's scandal.
The previous scandal would have been nothing compared to the nightmare Madhu would have to face this time if her husband died so soon after marriage.
Ironically, Shamsher's first priority being Madhu led to him trying to kill RK - and also later led to him accepting RK wholeheartedly as his daughter's husband.
If he was terribly wrong in his lack of hesitation in the former instance, he was a devoted father in the second instance in choosing to let all bygones be for his daughter's happiness.
Padmini too is placing her enormous indebtedness to and concern for Mallick a distant second after what so nearly happened to Madhu not once but *twice* (that she knows of).
RK is - to her - her daughter's husband. And as someone she has grown to trust with that position, he is the lynchpin she understands to be crucial to Madhu's happiness and indeed wellbeing.
It's absolutely wrong of her to discount what Mallick has done for her and her children for over two decades.
But - like Mallick - she's thinking with raw emotion and anguish. Give it time, and she'll come around, just as Mallick did.
The circumstances are different, but Shamsher's and Padmini's reaction have both been rooted in their outraged anguish at hurt Madhu suffered.
Only the cause of Madhu's hurt - and therefore the target of an anguished parent - has been different in each case.
Edited by leelaa9 - 12 years ago