You seem really unable to understand a simple point. I was talking about the ACT OF MURDER in GENERAL. Murder is justified when its in self-defense, I'm guessing you know that. And who justified Tej Singh or Tapasya here? Where did they come in from in THIS debate? Strange. My topic is strictly confined to discussing Yuvi, so PLEASE conform to that. And let me reply back to you in a similar vein: If Yuvi can escape the law with your "he can be reformed" logic, why not apply it to Tej Singh as well? Let's not send him to jail either, shall we? And we always used to clamour for Tappu's punishment in this forum before, didn't we? I guess we've forgiven her since she truly repents her mistakes and has lived for nineteen years in isolation doing charity, which sort of redeems her. Yuvi has till date never felt TRULY SORRY. He apologized to her out of fear and justified his deed before Mai, saying SHE PROVOKED HIM.
And what do you mean by "what trauma Mukta has faced"? Do you even understand what trauma means? The expierience of having been so close to being raped is a major trauma for ANY WOMAN. Plus the grinds of the court and Police procedures, which is utterly dehumanizing. Did you not watch the episodes in which Mukta went to the Police to complain, and was inhumanly humiliated by their questioning (the episode right after the attempted rape). Is it not utterly crushing for ANY WOMAN to face it, mind-rape after a brush with physical rape? You need to know what you're talking about.
ATTEMPTED RAPE REQUIRES LEGAL PUNISHMENT AND YUVI CAN'T BE LET OFF JUST BECAUSE HE IS VEER-ICCHA'S SON. Iccha is doing the right thing--let's support her for once, shall we?
Edited by krystal_watz - 13 years ago