Kool's Commentary : Sep 22 PR - Page 3

Hey friends...I have nothing much to say that haven't been said already...

The whole Mahaepisode kind of bored me...episodes like this, where any and all actors/actresses dances random dances without a real common theme using different dance style, kinda bores me, (although the classical try by some were praise worthy ... it isn't easy to dance purely in the classical style without training, and most dancers in that section did well)...beside the message of Ganpati utsav gets diluted too..I feel.

Found it extremely weird that Archana danced in the show not only because she is suppose to be 54 yr old, but also because a 'bahu' doesn't really dance in front of Samdhis and entertain a public crowd...It reminded me of Bhansali's Devdas where Paro danced with Chandramukhi to entertain the public in front of a damaad...extremely bad direction, in my humble opinion...that is all I can say...or maybe, PR India has moved forward beyond my prehistoric imagination...😃

Now, regarding Arjun/Purvi dream sequence...well the action of dreaming of another girl, by a married man, is extremely immoral...Arjun and Purvi doing the eyelocks was simply distasteful, in my POV. If Arjun feels so desperate, I ask again, why isn't he going for a divorce...who is stopping him...surely he doesn't need permission from Purvi...or maybe he does...btw..does he take permission from Purvi for taking a shower or going potty...😃

Kool...in Bengal or anywhere in India, Bahu's just don't dance alone to entertain the public...it is a big no no...bahus dances inside the home in front of females friends maybe, but never in front of men, period..it is a simply the Mariyada, decency and traditions that India symbolizes...no bahu will dance with a devdasi (courtesans)...it is simply distasteful to this day...can't even imagine why the notable director went for such stupid and cheap stuff...surely only for the commercial value...that is all...I found the same lack of insight in yesterday's episode of a bahu dancing in public in a very traditional event, where all are present...it was very cheap and distasteful to dance in front of Samdhis and damaad in full view of the public. Simply this kind of acts by bahus set the tongue rolling...no Inlaws allows such acts...only Sasurs like Damo can sit and watch a presentation like this...most Sasurs will simply walk away...

Same with Arjun's dance...he was sitting in front of the God and thinking of another women...how distasteful is that? then what is the 'Pavitra' in their love story...nothing...if it only means a love has to lead to a marriage and a physical relationship...then it isn't a relationship of the soul but relationship in the physical sense...now, I keep asking this question: if he is pining so much, shouldn't he can go for a divorce?? why is he waiting??? does that permission have to come from Purvi?? what is he?? A puppy waiting for a command from his master??? Or is he waiting to be given away by Ovi on a golden plate to Purvi...how is this palatable??? what is the 'uniqueness' of their love if none of them can take it beyond their mortal physical self.it is only a relationship (as masti said before, I think) only of mortal body, nothing spiritual about it...I found him looking at Purvi extremely distasteful, like a roadside romeo with a wife by his side...what a character it has become??? And this is being called as "pavitra' love...spare me...

Absence of Savita was an eyesore...well, with so much distasteful things shown , this shouldn't come as a surprise...Good question, if DAmo hate Savita so much, why isn't he divorcing...besides, who is he to punish Savita, when as a father and a husband he has been a failure all his life. And what about the fact that he kept quite too knowing the truth...what did he do to exonerate himself??

Besides, if the MU was only because Savita didn't give Archana the tickets, then what was the reason of that inflated ego that prevented Arman from reaching out to each other all these 18 yrs...in Indian culture, saints go through self inflicted pain if Ego becomes greater than one's being...these 2 lovebirds never for once done an introspection to see what or why they waited for Savita to begin the divorce procedure...were these 2 dumb??? what is the "Pavitra' of their love story here...nothing...maybe they should thank their lucky star that Savita started the procedure...otherwise they could have died without know the truth...how silly the Cvs have become...

Originally posted by: vgiri

Kool, u know something..we expected this ARVI dance attack from u. Hoping/ u would skip KC today to keep us happy. I enjoyed ARVI and Ankita dance. Regd Savitha, thought she ia manav's step mom. No?
3 tiimes u have mentioned about Savitha's absence, do u really miss her so much.

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Kools reporting from base : Ganpati festivities in PR

Only Savita was not there . Savita who brought her three children up inspite of her husband's alcoholism . Savita who fought the world in her own crude , crass way whenever her kids were falsely accused or in trouble .

Her crime ?

She did not like her son's wife . You see miraculously strange , bad things happened in her family ever since this marraige took place .

Some can say that it is the other way around . That Archana's life was never the same because of Savita . But I am not starting any debate here . I ask only this question .

What kind of a sanskaar is it to exclude your biological mother from a holy function when she is very much living with you ?