contestant doesn't perform 5 times goes to Semi-fi

THis should be in Guinness book of world records and also in Limca world records. A contestant who doesn't perform 5 times gets to go to Semi-Final. Wow, really, i feel sorry for those contestants who worked hard for those 5 episodes and more to reach to top, only for one contestant to hold the top spot without performing. First time in the history of Reality Show.

Better than being a sore loser and bursting out on judges especially when one isn't even a good dancer to stay on the stage. Isha was much better than that. Have fun bashing her cuz that's the sole intention of the thread when so many threads are already dedicated to the same issue.

Also, It only happens on JDJ when people without performing for 7-8 weeks, forget about 5 performances, get a direct entry in the show in the middle of the competition and the same contestants today are in the finals. And I feel sorry for non WC contestants who have been taking a toll on health since day 1.

Either both are fair or both are unfair, since they both are format of the show.

If wildcards can perform after 7 weeks thwn why nt isha miss 5 epis.
😡
Fair chance it is. my pov
Peace

I agree with the TM that this wasn't a fair move by the judges. I also agree with Chandramukhi that I don't find the WC entries fair either.

Originally posted by: -Chandramukhi-

Better than being a sore loser and bursting out on judges especially when one isn't even a good dancer to stay on the stage. Isha was much better than that. Have fun bashing her cuz that's the sole intention of the thread when so many threads are already dedicated to the same issue.

Also, It only happens on JDJ when people without performing for 7-8 weeks, forget about 5 performances, get a direct entry in the show in the middle of the competition and the same contestants today are in the finals. And I feel sorry for non WC contestants who have been taking a toll on health since day 1.

If both is fair or both is unfair since they both are format of the show.

Originally posted by: ArHi.

This is where I disagree. There are many shows where wildcards participate and make it to the finals without having taken part in the show earlier. Two examples off the top of my head are Raghav in Dance India Dance 3 and Jeet in LM2.

And in any show you see, if a contestant is unwell to the extent that they cannot perform they leave the show.

If you say so, sure, I agree with you. But for me the deal is that if WC is fair then so is Veto, cuz they both are format of the show. If you wanna call both fair or unfair, its fine, but one can't be fair while other unfair, simply talking about JDJ. I am actually glad to see good dancers in the finals compared to non dancers especially when I enjoy both Rashmi and Rithvik. For me it isn't the matter of whether they deserve it or not, what gets to me is people trying to justify one over the other. For me they both WC and Veto have disadvantage on other contestants. So call them both unfair if you think one of them isn't fair. That's it.

Originally posted by: -Chandramukhi-

If you say so, sure, I agree with you. But for me the deal is that if WC is fair then so is Veto, cuz they both are format of the show. If you wanna call both fair or unfair, its fine, but one can't be fair while other unfair, simply talking about JDJ. I am actually glad to see good dancers in the finals compared to non dancers especially when I enjoy both Rashmi and Rithvik. For me it isn't the matter of whether they deserve it or not, what gets to me is people trying to justify one over the other. For me they both WC and Veto have disadvantage on other contestants. So call them both unfair if you think one of them isn't fair. That's it.

i agree with chandramukhi ...if WC is fair then Veto power is also fair..oher wise both are unfair..

Agree with topic maker...

This JDJ season has left an impression that actually instead of showing reality they are ending up showing fictional show...?

Celebrities for next season should think twice before signing JDJ how muchever they work the scripted show will result will be in favour of some contestants?

NOtE: its my POV if anyone feel offended contact MODS

in almost all reality show there is a wild card entrants...

in some cases may be the good performer is out bcose of the votes...or sometimes the popular contestant is out bcose of the votes...

then the chanel do a wc entry...its happenend in almost all shows even in JDJ last seasons...

and about veto ...if veto is in the rule the judges can use...but howmany times...

in UN assembly also veto can be used only once...but in JDJ 5 veto used twice...one for no double elimination...and one for free entry to semifinals...i think this is first time in JDJ history 2 vetos...

okeey if WC is fair...veto is also fair...

but after getting saved and got entry to semifinals also..not performing...and judges or anchor doesnt have problem with tooo make what sense...?? another veto...???
is it fair????