I think abortion is legal in India so long as the pregnancy does not cross a legally specified timeframe. So, that takes care of the legality of it. I think the Catholic religion prohibits MTP. Maybe Islam does too, although am not too sure of this one. Since Hinduism does not lay down very strict codes of behaviour, I think we can safely assume there is nothing there on this issue. That still leaves us with the moral and medical angles to it.
Of course, by virtue of being the one to bear the child physically, the woman should logically have the greatest say in the matter. However, does this negate the right of the father? Does contributing to the conception give the father any right over the pregnancy?
There was a Salman Khan film, I don't remember the name. In that, Shilpa Shetty, who plays his wife, does not want to have a baby because she wants to focus on her modelling career. She however conceives and does not want to continue with the pregnancy, Salman goes to court and gets an injunction against the MTP. She has to continue with the pregnancy and hand over the child to him after birth. Of course, all is resolved in the climax qand there is a happy ending. However, that is a film at the end of the day. Is obtaining an injunction really legally tenable and what is the guarantee that there will be a happy ending? Also, if the mother is going to carry through with the pregnancy feeling resentful about it, how will this impact the child?
What are your thoughts on all of this?