Question (confusion about laws)

If JW is ready to give everything to Bani, then why do we need a court case??????and a trial????

they could both agree for a divorce and she can take the money right????

lol tru point out of court settlement buh ektaji (no disrespect) enjoyz elongating things so jus to add to the tension

but i thought Jai's signature doesn't hold any significance any more and his accounts were frozen or something. Remember Ranveer transferred all of jai's property in his name thatz why they need a court case so that Bani could get whatever she wants and Jai be back in power. The court needs to give Bani everything and that way Ranveer's property transfer papers don't hold any significance.

i thot bani claimed for da 50% nd da other 50% is in jais hands......duz dat mean ranvir took da other 50%?

Originally posted by: bookshop1979

If JW is ready to give everything to Bani, then why do we need a court case??????and a trial????

they could both agree for a divorce and she can take the money right????

OMG!! U read my mind..I was just about to post this topic in a couple minutes when I saw your post..this is what I was just about to write, infact :

Tell me one thing folks, if the accused (in this case Jai) is WILLING to settle for whatever the accuser (Bani) has demanded in the petition, will the case still go to court??? Would'nt or can't it get settled out of court, if both parties agree to the terms??

I mean..if both of them sign the divorce papers and Jai willingly grants her the 50 or 60 or whatever %-age of his property, then why the court and lawyer and case??!!

Dhruvie

i think sumtin great wud happen at da court...may b tarun wud try 2 fynd evry detail of da case and ask bani y duz she want a divorce....den bani myt tell tarun da whole situation nd tarun wud investigate it nd fynd da real culpritz rajvijay nd roshni....but i dunt think dey will show it dat quicly

Originally posted by: dhruvie05

OMG!! U read my mind..I was just about to post this topic in a couple minutes when I saw your post..this is what I was just about to write, infact :

Tell me one thing folks, if the accused (in this case Jai) is WILLING to settle for whatever the accuser (Bani) has demanded in the petition, will the case still go to court??? Would'nt or can't it get settled out of court, if both parties agree to the terms??

I mean..if both of them sign the divorce papers and Jai willingly grants her the 50 or 60 or whatever %-age of his property, then why the court and lawyer and case??!!

Dhruvie

I am not sure of India but from where I come from, the term "accused" is used in criminal proceedings and the person filing the application is called "complainant". In divorce proceedings it's "THE APPLICANT" [person filing for divorce/case] and "THE RESPONDENT" [person against whom the case is filed and he/she is given an opportunity to respond to the initial application]

Even if the parties to a proceeding has agreed to certain terms and conditions, they still have to go to court to have that sealed as orders of the court. They do not have to go for a trial but will have to make an appearance in court where their presence will be noted and orders made BY CONSENT of both parties. Only then it becomes enforceable.

Maybe if they go through the court case then Bani might change her decision on Divorce.

i have another question. can someone file for divorce when she's pregnant? i mean , i think i read somewhere that this isnt possible.but of course, i dont know much abt indian law. 😕