Just remembered..

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

hussainramso

@hussainramso

Inactive

Posted: 13 years ago

#31

Originally posted by: MERARAI

Pardon me! This sounds like a post from our lovely MMG aka kEEnkEEn. Am I the last one to figure that out?

Hiya ladies🤗! The alumni is still enjoying the show 👏. Too bad I can't digest this &^()^.😆

@bold

Yes!!

Quote

trina_saras

@trina_saras

Stunner

+ 7

Posted: 13 years ago

#32

Originally posted by: a_uma
In the struggle with guruma's goons... P fell down and was unconscious...

Args killed that man and dragged P to the hospital.. P was groggy till she got treatment from the Doc..

so.. what gawahi is she talking about... technically she is not an eye-witness at all.. 😕

She can't claim to have been an eye witness to Arushi accidentally killing the goon, but she can at least recall what the scene was like before this. She can attest to the fact that they indeed came to her for "help" with their case and then later admitting it was a hoax, followed her and Arushi on a deserted road at night and harassed them, etc.

She is going to have to supply character witnesses for Arushi Saxena just like any murder trial. Like what she was doing before this event happened, and what kind of person she is like. I mean, it was easy for her to prove what a lamo Piasiya's husband was and how the Thakurs were all innocent even though it happened on their property. Arushi has a far better name in the community than the Thakurs. If an official on the electricity board is willing to sign her papers just because she is the Professor's daughter, then that shows how much standing educated people have in Allahabad.

Even the inspector who was at the site observed it didn't look like a premeditated crime. I mean, what would Arushi even be doing with one of Guruma's thugs? She had nothing to do with the case against Guruma. They were both in the wrong place at the wrong time. It's for Pratigya to prove all of that.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

CrAzYRED

@CrAzYRED

Rocker

Posted: 13 years ago

#33

She'd had an outer body experience🤣 but i don't think that it will hold up in court she'd need to start from scratch to learn the law again.

Quote

corvette

@corvette

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#34

Originally posted by: trina_one

She can't claim to have been an eye witness to Arushi accidentally killing the goon, but she can at least recall what the scene was like before this. She can attest to the fact that they indeed came to her for "help" with their case and then later admitting it was a hoax, followed her and Arushi on a deserted road at night and harassed them, etc.

She is going to have to supply character witnesses for Arushi Saxena just like any murder trial. Like what she was doing before this event happened, and what kind of person she is like. I mean, it was easy for her to prove what a lamo Piasiya's husband was and how the Thakurs were all innocent even though it happened on their property. Arushi has a far better name in the community than the Thakurs. If an official on the electricity board is willing to sign her papers just because she is the Professor's daughter, then that shows how much standing educated people have in Allahabad.

Even the inspector who was at the site observed it didn't look like a premeditated crime. I mean, what would Arushi even be doing with one of Guruma's thugs? She had nothing to do with the case against Guruma. They were both in the wrong place at the wrong time. It's for Pratigya to prove all of that.

Pratigya can make the impossible possible - bas baat khatam!

In my case, the less I analyse the better for my BP.😳

I mean there's nothing weird about representing your sister in a murder trial in which you are a key witness, no worries about any potential conflict of interest whatsoever, you can just hop in and out of the witness box as you need to, right? After all, this is Pratigya!

Even the Court will have no problem in accepting this or have any qualms about Pratigya's higher duty to the court over that to her sister, will it? So it will happily accept whatever Pratigya says coz its Arushi versus a couple of no good goons, I mean the former is bound to be telling the truth over the latter?

Thank God for your sentence in red!

As a last note can I just say- for me - it would make better viewing if I actually saw P sweat blood and tears in prepping for this case for her sister rather than witnesses magically appearing out of nowhere like they did in the Lochan trial. What's the big rush? As a potential murder suspect Arushi's already on bail - wouldnt have killed to have kept her behind bars a little longer, like Krishna, pending the outcome of the trial. Do murder/unlawful killing suspects get bail that easily?

A dash of reality now and again might help to improve this once brilliant show

Quote

lakshmi pai

@lakshmi_pai

Voyager

Posted: 13 years ago

#35

Originally posted by: a_uma
In the struggle with guruma's goons... P fell down and was unconscious...

Args killed that man and dragged P to the hospital.. P was groggy till she got treatment from the Doc..
so.. what gawahi is she talking about... technically she is not an eye-witness at all.. 😕

@#bold...when did that happen ??...baap re...do din mein ne show miss kiya aur yeh sab bakhwaaasss...nautanki...i cant bear this arushi at all...jaise pati waisee biwi...

Quote

Simmi

@simmi.friends03

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#36

Originally posted by: a_uma
In the struggle with guruma's goons... P fell down and was unconscious...

Args killed that man and dragged P to the hospital.. P was groggy till she got treatment from the Doc..
so.. what gawahi is she talking about... technically she is not an eye-witness at all.. 😕

thats what i m worried about...becx that all point will be raised by the other vakilwa..to cut the prats defense..and same when Arushi says that prat was saved by her by hitting that goonda...than they that that so called rape is going on she wasn't there that moment may be Pratigya was raped by that goonda when Arushi again reach there and both sister killed that goonda to hide the fact about the rape...so that nobody will ever come to know about her rape...

and than came the Gurumaa's deal that if pratigya will fight for Gurumaa's case than only she order her cheles to give witness that nothing has happen to pratigya's izzat...

hope cv will not drag that case to that level...but after the friday's episode...cv clealy give the hint...prat says that she need krishna's support & trust...as worst r yet to come...and the way SS say to krishna that Pratigya can't fight this case as mrs.Pratigya Krishna singh...

Quote

a_uma

@a_uma

Rocker

Posted: 13 years ago

#37

Originally posted by: trina_one

She can't claim to have been an eye witness to Arushi accidentally killing the goon, but she can at least recall what the scene was like before this. She can attest to the fact that they indeed came to her for "help" with their case and then later admitting it was a hoax, followed her and Arushi on a deserted road at night and harassed them, etc.

She is going to have to supply character witnesses for Arushi Saxena just like any murder trial. Like what she was doing before this event happened, and what kind of person she is like. I mean, it was easy for her to prove what a lamo Piasiya's husband was and how the Thakurs were all innocent even though it happened on their property. Arushi has a far better name in the community than the Thakurs. If an official on the electricity board is willing to sign her papers just because she is the Professor's daughter, then that shows how much standing educated people have in Allahabad.

Even the inspector who was at the site observed it didn't look like a premeditated crime. I mean, what would Arushi even be doing with one of Guruma's thugs? She had nothing to do with the case against Guruma. They were both in the wrong place at the wrong time. It's for Pratigya to prove all of that.

Its true that the goons followed Arg and P and wanted to harm them... threatening and actually harming are two different issues ... but here the case is about murder... Arg has to prove beyond doubt that she killed the goon in self-defense... for that Args has to prove that she and P were actually being harmed by the goons at that moment ..

Quote

trina_saras

@trina_saras

Stunner

+ 7

Posted: 13 years ago

#38

Originally posted by: a_uma

Its true that the goons followed Arg and P and wanted to harm them... threatening and actually harming are two different issues ... but here the case is about murder... Arg has to prove beyond doubt that she killed the goon in self-defense... for that Args has to prove that she and P were actually being harmed by the goons at that moment ..

It's true that she has to prove that. But she already had a strong case in terms of character support. She isn't going to randomly kill someone just because they were being followed by them, is she? She had no grudge against them, and even if Pratigya had something against them she is a lawyer now. She is paid to be a part of the justice system, not uphold it. Pratigya herself was injured, and they didn't know the man actually died then , so is it their fault they didn't have time to turn themselves in? In order for her to prove they were being harmed by the goons, they also have to prove a history of their misbehavior which shouldn't be hard. As as we know from history, witnesses have a way of popping up at the last minute.

Arushi didn't literally say "hurt my sister and I will kill you." That would have been a direct threat. So this is a gray area right here. Just because the friend of Sarju claims that it was a cold-blooded murder doesn't make it so. They both have to prove first that Pratigya was struck unconscious, then that situation would obviously make it easier for them to take advantage of her weak physical and mental state. That wouldn't be hard at all, if somehow they dug up a woman who has earlier faced problems with Sarju in the past. Make it seem as if the guy was capable of anything, harassing women but also physically assaulting them. He claimed to be defending Guruma's name, teaching the lawyer a lesson for not taking her case, was he also doing that when he attempted to rape her in the dark of night? In the presence of his friends? Pratigya was and is their main target, but Arushi got caught up in the issue accidentally. She is merely a scapegoat for the so-called disciples of Guruma. (I think harassers would be a more accurate word.) Arushi has the advantage of having a relatively clean past, not sure we can say the same about the thug who was killed.

Quote

MERARAI

@MERARAI

Stunner

Posted: 13 years ago

#39

Originally posted by: HOTHUGZ

Good point! Creatives and the story writers are probably doing their jobs under the influence...

Pragmatic is this you? Have the Ole timers decided to have new IDs😲? How come no one told me? 😲🤔

Quote

Sam

@Love-u-all

Rocker

Posted: 13 years ago

#40

Originally posted by: MERARAI

Pragmatic is this you? Have the Ole timers decided to have new IDs😲? How come no one told me? 😲🤔

Yes its me pragmatic aka Sam, I had a choice between going back to my original ID SAM2U or HOTHUGZ suggested by a another IF buddy. For you mam, the legendary MERARAI suits the best 😃

Quote

1 2 3 4

Just remembered.. - Page 4

Related Topics

Explore Topics