🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026:M18: India vs Namibia, Delhi 🏏
ANGER KICKS 12.2
VANIs TRAUMA 13.2
Here to watch this show s downfall
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026:M19: AUS vs ZIM, Colombo 🏏
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026:M16: SL vs Oman, Pallekele 🏏
The mother of all get togethers
Why is Karan doing so much ass-licking of Rani!!?
Udit Narayan's first wife, Ranjana, accuses him of removing her uterus
Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2: EDT #11
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026:M17: Italy vs Nepal , Wankhede🏏
Most handsome naag
All 3 Mardaani films are successful :BOI. Rani holds record now!
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026:M20: CAN vs UAE, Delhi 🏏
A Melodious Whisper to the Horizon
Zee Cine Awards 2026 discussion thread- nominations out
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: M21: NED vs USA at Chennai🏏
im in!!!đ
btw "MonicA#1Actress"
johns mine!!!!!đ
Whether abt this Topic.. or abt Debate Contest..!
if the Topic is "M Vs N"..
and if a person"X" believes in "M".. then what do we get by choosing him to Debate Against "M" and in favor of "N".. ? He will be knowing that Y is telling truth abt M, and Y is right, and M is better. But His job is to prove N right, which he doesn't believe in from starting. He will give Logic abt N, (which he knows, are not good enuf) and will try to prove wrong the "Facts abt N" (which he knows r right)..!
Obviously, Person X.. is playing with the Facts and hiding important stuff..and trying to fool others.
And ridiculous thing is.. while voting, we don't know.. that whatever Person X wrote.. does he himself believe in it or not ( coz we dont know..whether he wanted to be "For or Against" )
My suggestion is,, it is better if 10-15 topics are posted here.. and it shud be left on ppl.. who wants to debate for which topic n at which side. "first come first served. "
I hope not to get you against me....my head is still CIRCLINGđ
Whether abt this Topic.. or abt Debate Contest..!
if the Topic is "M Vs N"..
and if a person"X" believes in "M".. then what do we get by choosing him to Debate Against "M" and in favor of "N".. ? He will be knowing that Y is telling truth abt M, and Y is right, and M is better. But His job is to prove N right, which he doesn't believe in from starting. He will give Logic abt N, (which he knows, are not good enuf) and will try to prove wrong the "Facts abt N" (which he knows r right)..!
Obviously, Person X.. is playing with the Facts and hiding important stuff..and trying to fool others.
And ridiculous thing is.. while voting, we don't know.. that whatever Person X wrote.. does he himself believe in it or not ( coz we dont know..whether he wanted to be "For or Against" )
My suggestion is,, it is better if 10-15 topics are posted here.. and it shud be left on ppl.. who wants to debate for which topic n at which side. "first come first served. "
that's the challenge isn't it? to be randomly assigned a side you don't necessarily believe in and argue in its favour.
it may be a little more difficult, but you actually step into the other person's shoes and understand their POV. obviously person X will try to prove certain facts wrong - thats the entire point of the debate. but, is he/she able to do so convincingly? is it the fact that only we are looking at the topic in one way which we think is right?
if we leave it upto the people to pick sides, a lot might just pick one side - no one would pick the opposing side at all. that way, an interesting topic would be just set aside due to lack of debators.
also, when it comes to voting - does it MATTER what person X believes in as long as the arguments he/she presents are clear and convincing? though, in this case, i feel that most people vote for the side they believe in and dont even read the arguments. i think voting should change to a panel of impartial judges.
PS. i'm NOT taking part. đ
Me can't stay outta dis:-o.... count me innnnđ.... the name's Bond B-)... James Bond B-)
JKgđ... iz Ria