Judge's state of mind

This case has shown how badly the law is protected when we have Abhi and the judge being part of the system.

First Abhi said blood stain would prove without a doubt the identity of the killer. When K blood sample matched Abhi was persistent that a guilty verdict should be passed. Later when it was found that the sample do not match then Abhi backtracked from his statement that the blood matching is of no significance. Abhi only defence was K Background and therefore K is the killer. I can understand Abhi not being a competent lawyer and not understanding the law but what is wrong with the judge.

Was he sleeping thru the proceedings and not seen the inconsistencies in the testimony and evidence? He would have had enough doubt in his mind that K probably is not the killer. Why did he too agree with Abhi, an incompetent lawyer version and not see what was presented

your say?

judge is lazy .. prob got bored of have to come back day after day ...

abhi needs to study whole law again i simply have not seen him providing any evidence or behaving like a lawyer just saying kst is a kille and making faces in court

Actually benefit of doubt is on the accused side...in Indoan law...

Nothing...possible today will see a FB of tamtam...he bribed Judge too..😳🥱

it is as though CV's wanted to bring back old KST, so they made the judge to come to a conclusion which will make him angry n loose his temper.

He has taken a Pratigya to make all arrangements that will punish Krishna...

Originally posted by: -Devu-

Nothing...possible today will see a FB of tamtam...he bribed Judge too..😳🥱

Then K should bribe Mr. President 😆

In ASY style, "paani ki tarah saaf hain" ...that everything is pending... but verdict given...👎🏼

Hmmm ASY not a lawyer he is just passing his statements Like learning in a school nothing else 😡
Judge himself is confused so how,ll he decide who is rit and who is wrong !!!