Originally posted by: DMKJ_VB
I don't think cvs are highlighting chauvinism. they r showing it to be wrong. But such elders do exist. and matured conversation and handling like Yash and aarti is needed. Leaving the house without even one try is not the solution and is immatured.
Prateek used the policy-"Offense is the best defense" so I don't support him totally. I would hv supported him whole heartedly, if he had not given Pari false assurances, and convinced his dad before the wedding. Telling him " u hv not given us the right" is not the solution to the problem. If he was so modern, he would never hv even hoped that pari would leave her job. But he did. He chose the easy way out- a lie! Even when Yash was willing to go and convince SP about Pari's job.
I agree that Prateek is to blame here as well. I had said that in another post. Prateek lied, kept lying, and was all for Paridhi's continuing to work in secret. It could've gone on and on, and there would've been no problems from him. He was perfectly happy to let it continue.
But at the same time, I think Prateek was right in what he said to his father. He's seen how his father is. How he doesn't relent. He was afraid. And everything he said to his father, was right after he observed and saw his parents' behaviour, tactics and actions with his own eyes.
My point is that Aarti herself is now handling these things maturely, but not too long ago she too acted with her emotions. I'm not saying Acted acted immaturely, but it really wasn't that different than Paridhi's acting on her emotions. Aarti came to the point she's at now because of all that had happened, because she saw Yash take a bullet for Ansh, which changed a lot for her and in her.
Edited by likarsh - 13 years ago