Originally posted by: nili_frkaranika
well love shudnt b so blind dat one cud kill smbody đ it's a big crime aftrall !!
yess..love should have pagalpan but not such a pagalpan to kill sum1
MAIRAs BIRTHDAY 13.1
CAKE KA TAMASHA 14.1
🏏WPL 2026: Match 6: MIW vs GGW at Navi Mumbai on 13/01/26🏏
Dharma on verge of getting closed
🏏New Zealand Tour of India 2026: 2nd ODI: At Rajkot on 14/01/26 D/N🏏
Maira Vani storyline
Tulsi SN Business bacha payegi??
Tulsi fried Noyna. Mihir rejoices [VIDEO ATTACHED]
Happy Birthday Sultan Mirza 🧁
Toxic song - Chand se pucha
Happy New year
Ship name for Aryamann and Purvi
🏏WPL 2026: Match 7: DCW vs UPWW at DY Patil on 14/01/26🏏
Originally posted by: nili_frkaranika
well love shudnt b so blind dat one cud kill smbody đ it's a big crime aftrall !!
Originally posted by: karankritz4lyf
Wow so tru...they should hav thought all this from d begining b4 they took any big step...
hmm.. fair enoughđ¤Originally posted by: khota_sikka_sri
You know this had more to do with revenge than with living together "happily ever after". For Charu, it was revenge for her friend's death. And for Sameer it was revenge for his friend's death. Both wanted to kill the people who killed their friends with no care for the outcomes. They may have named it a killing for the sake of love, but it was revenge, not love that provoked them to commit this crime.
Originally posted by: khota_sikka_sri
<font face="Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif" size="2" color="#3333ff">You know this had more to do with revenge than with living together "happily ever after". For Charu, it was revenge for her friend's death. And for Sameer it was revenge for his friend's death. Both wanted to kill the people who killed their friends with no care for the outcomes. They may have named it a killing for the sake of love, but it was revenge, not love that provoked them to commit this crime.</font>
Originally posted by: Freethinker112
No, it was not fair to kill the whole family, not even for their love. I missed the beginning of the episode, but as far as I understood, Tushar was the killer and people in family resented his action. Yeah, the family watched silently but that doesn't sign their death warrant. The couple should have filed a complaint against Tushar in police. Even if they had killed Tushar, they would have my sympathy as he was a threat to them. But the whole family? There was a small kid! Killing Tushar, I would have called self defense. But the whole family, that was just massacre. I don't care if you are in love or what, that wasn't justified.
Originally posted by: S.Stephy
The phrase 'everything is fair in love' really doesn't make sense and a lot of people use this phrase to justify their wrong actions taken based n or due to love.
A pure and selfless emotion such as love can never cause a person to harm any fellow human being and if it does, then it was never 'love'.