Posted:
Originally posted by: nili_frkaranika
well love shudnt b so blind dat one cud kill smbody 😒 it's a big crime aftrall !!
yess..love should have pagalpan but not such a pagalpan to kill sum1
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 10th Oct 2025
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 11th Oct 2025 - WKV
THALI KA BAINGAN 11.10
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Oct 11, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Tum se Tum tak episodes - EDT #2
Masterminds-Pari n RV
Rumour - Alia Bhatt In Kalki 2
Anupamaa 10 Oct 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Katrina has destroyed her face! even Kareena looks better than her
Kyunki episode Summary with pics : Oct 11
Is Janhvi Kapoor a better actress than Aishwarya Rai ever was?
Sakshi Tanwar to enter Kyunki
✦ Font-astic Voyage Contest Voting Round 2 | Invites ONLY ✦
Happy Birthday Amitabh Bachchan
Out now song - Rahein Na Rahein Hum - Thamma
East or West, Farhana is da beshhhttt
Deepika appointed as India's first Mental Health Ambassador
Originally posted by: nili_frkaranika
well love shudnt b so blind dat one cud kill smbody 😒 it's a big crime aftrall !!
Originally posted by: karankritz4lyf
Wow so tru...they should hav thought all this from d begining b4 they took any big step...
hmm.. fair enough🤔Originally posted by: khota_sikka_sri
You know this had more to do with revenge than with living together "happily ever after". For Charu, it was revenge for her friend's death. And for Sameer it was revenge for his friend's death. Both wanted to kill the people who killed their friends with no care for the outcomes. They may have named it a killing for the sake of love, but it was revenge, not love that provoked them to commit this crime.
Originally posted by: khota_sikka_sri
<font face="Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif" size="2" color="#3333ff">You know this had more to do with revenge than with living together "happily ever after". For Charu, it was revenge for her friend's death. And for Sameer it was revenge for his friend's death. Both wanted to kill the people who killed their friends with no care for the outcomes. They may have named it a killing for the sake of love, but it was revenge, not love that provoked them to commit this crime.</font>
Originally posted by: Freethinker112
No, it was not fair to kill the whole family, not even for their love. I missed the beginning of the episode, but as far as I understood, Tushar was the killer and people in family resented his action. Yeah, the family watched silently but that doesn't sign their death warrant. The couple should have filed a complaint against Tushar in police. Even if they had killed Tushar, they would have my sympathy as he was a threat to them. But the whole family? There was a small kid! Killing Tushar, I would have called self defense. But the whole family, that was just massacre. I don't care if you are in love or what, that wasn't justified.
Originally posted by: S.Stephy
The phrase 'everything is fair in love' really doesn't make sense and a lot of people use this phrase to justify their wrong actions taken based n or due to love.
A pure and selfless emotion such as love can never cause a person to harm any fellow human being and if it does, then it was never 'love'.
