Manipulation of da real story for trps

Life_Is_Dutiful thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#1
I had gone thru many websites and read stories abt shiv and sati.in some of da sites,it's written dat sati did tapasya or meditation.Shiv was impressed with her tapasya,appeared before her and asked her a boon.when sati told shiv dat she wants 2 marry him,shiv obliged and both got married and dey lived happily 4 many years.But nothing of dis sort was shown in the serial.dey never showed sati doing tapasya and shiv asking her 4 boon.i agree makers make certain changes in mythological serials 2 gain trps but dat doesn't mean dey can show a completely different story.dis is like cheating da viewers but ofcourse we don't know what's da real story of shiv and sati so we accept whatever is shown.One more thing.there was no child born 2 shiv and sati.i am doubtful whether dey will show deir milan.

Created

Last reply

Replies

19

Views

7k

Users

14

Likes

48

Frequent Posters

-Nymphadora- thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 13 years ago
#2
another version says a swayamvar took place and she learnt Yogic teachings through Shiv-the show isnt wrong-it isnt a very popular version f the story though!about the milan-there is no mention anywhere about that!
sejalshah thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#3
The version subha you talking about takes place with parvarti not sati..
--PAYEL-- thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#4
absolutly right, this show is killing the real history about shiv and sati...and why they r showing shiv-sati's milan,...i've never heard about the milan of shiv and sati...they can't cheat the viewers like this...
SnakeEyes thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#5
Dear Goddess Parvati did tapasya for marrying lord Shiva not Goddess Sati...
Arakshi_Lover thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 13 years ago
#6
yes...its d story of parvati not sati!!!!!
Sweet24 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#7
Well the "Yogya" word used here repeatedly in the show, they are showing that Sati is not yogya. They are mentioning that sati is not yogya of Shiv.

Well Devi AadyaShakti has taken birth in Daksh house as her youngest daughter Sati. She was dearest daughter of Daksh, as she was the boon of his tapsya. But the yogya word is not mentioned in any granth. Yes, she herself doesn't kill any asur as she was Sati and it is also true that she had fired her body in Daksh yagya.

The Question arises that why she go to Daksh Yagya when she was not invited?

As Goddess, its also her duty to maintain peace and save the truth, dignity and pride of the Trimurti. She cannot see any wrong thing with anybody and if it happens she has to stop it. Daksh wanted to insult Shiv and wanted to start a pratha where Shiv is not invited. To stop him, Sati has to go there.

She try her best to make her father on the right path. But Daksh doesn't understand and insult her and her husband.

She gets very angry on the behavior of the Daksh. As she is the daughter of him, she can't give him punishment as its against the daughter-father relationship, and the punishment is necessary 4 him. Then, she decides that not to be his daughter and want to burn that body which was given by him.

In many scriptures, it was mention that Sati was very eager to meet her family, sisters. As for the long time, she haven't meet them. When the we talk about God, god is free from all 'bhavnaye'. So why did Sati reacted this way?

There is a rule that whenever any devtas take the birth of human, he will have to leave his powers and has to follow all rules, made 4 humans. He can know himself only through the yog shakti. This is also true.

For Sati, is a different case, She is both human and AadyaShakti(goddess). As a daughter, she has to make her father on the right path, and has a goddess she has to stop him. She has a faith that she will make daksh on right path as she is his dearest daughter.

But Daksh doesn't listen to her. So she has to take some decision.

There are many danavas and asur's are shown. Did there really exists that time?
The All Danavas who was children of Danu and Rishi kashyap.
The all Asurs are the children of Diti and Rishi Kashyap.
and Danu and Diti are also daughters of Daksh.
But Tarakasur doesn't exits that time.

Who is Shukracharya?
Shukra was the son of Rishi Brighu. He has done his studies under observation of Angira Rishi. Angira Rishi was the father of Brahaspati. He has always face pakshpaat, from Angira Rishi, As Angira always consider his son Brahaspati instead of Shukra.
Due to this Shukra studies a lot and is more brilliant then Brahaspati.

Has Sati has done any tapasya?
Well, that time wishes are all granted by seeing the nature of the person. Thats why Aditi's Son Vivaswaan(Surya Dev) and Indra got that position. when we read all we will see that time all people were very much great and got engaged in work.


Life_Is_Dutiful thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#8
well,this is where i got this info abt sati doing tapasya.http://www.indolink.com/Kidz/Stories/story22.html
Sia889 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#9
Interesting story this...but too many stories have been there for so many years as for how Mahadev and Sati got married..And the debate can be never ending on this issue yaar...unless Shiva himself shows us what exactly was the reality.
Edited by Killer_Shark - 13 years ago
Sweet24 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: subha2601

well,this is where i got this info abt sati doing tapasya.http://www.indolink.com/Kidz/Stories/story22.html


yaar this line is absolutely wrong,

Brahma, the Prajapati, mentally created ten sons (manasa putra) to carry out his task of creation and destruction. Both Shiva and Daksha were the outcome of such a creation.

Shiv was not a creation of brahmaji. There are many scriptures which are totaly wrong, I have read that In Bhagwat puran, part i don't remember written that 'Sati was the wife of Angira, and she accepted atharva as her son.' This line is completely wrong, this line shows the apposition towards Shiv. I don't know who is the great person who has written this. But when we compare to other scriptures this is totally wrong.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".