Chytra thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#1
Guys,
we have been hoarding a lot and looks like we need to set things straight now. I have asked my lawyer friend about this. She did decide to help me. She will answer the legality questions for all of us. As far as now

Jagaat and gauri marriage is not legal and its considered as punshibale offence. here is why

Whoever wishes to go for a "Registered Marriage" irrespective of the religion of the parties concerned, or in case the couple intending to marry are from different religions and do not wish to convert themselves into the religion of the other spouse and wishes to retain one's religion even after the marriage has to go through the prescribed procedure for the marriage under the Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Under the Special marriage Act the ceremony of the marriage is performed by signing in the register kept with the local Registrar of marriages, by both the parties and their witnesses. Normally the local document registrar known as The Sub-Registrar of Assurances is also the Registrar of Marriages, and his office is located at the Taluka (Tehsil) place.

Prior to the date fixed for the marriage, you have to fill in a form in that office, and submit alongwith other necessary requisites of the office [which primarily varies from office to office - but may include, age proof of each of the parties, their photographs etc.] alongwith the necessary fees and charges, primarily giving a minimum 30 days notice of the intended marriage in the given office. After the gap of minimum 30 days from the date of filling in the form of the Notice, you can either approach the office of the Marriage Registrar for signing on the register or ask him to come to the place of the marriage fixed by you (for which a prior appointment and payments shall be necessary). The Parties to the marriage and their witnesses sign on the register whereafter the Registrar of Marriages proclaims the couple as married to each other. Generally a certified copy of the extract of the register may be collected (naturally upon payment towards the same) after a few days from that office. This certified copy is generally also termed by many persons as the "Marriage Certificate".

Note : The notice of the intended marriage is normally hung in a conspicuous place for public viewing in the office of the Marriage Registrar and remains hanging for at least 30 days. Thus one can not marry under these procedures earlier than 30 days from the date of deciding to get married.


Created

Last reply

Replies

131

Views

9.4k

Users

14

Likes

200

Frequent Posters

Chytra thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#2
Not only did jagat did this marriage in a fake not of his status but also he did cross the limits by marrying on the same which is a clause that will be available on the terms and conditions of the forum they fill for applying. So both gauri and jagat will go and sit in jail if this comes out
runes thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#3
I just hope so. Wish to see both of them in jail
Chytra thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#4
The punishment for bigamy is imprisonment, which may extend till 7 years or fine or both. In case the person charged of bigamy has performed the second marriage by hiding the fact of first marriage, then he shall be punished with imprisonment of up to 10 years or fine or both. Such offence under section 495 is not compoundable.
patelcharu thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#5
It would be nice if JAGAT, GAURI and GAURI's PARENTS end up in Jail and Cancel their Doctor License as well.
Chytra thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#6
And saying again and again that singh family would go to jail for doing child marriages blah blah. No A big NO. They won't go anywhere not even have to pay a fine. i am not saying what they did is right but through law there is no chance to punish them.

Child Marriage Restraint (Amendment) Act, 1949 (41 of 1949), Section 7.
Limitation -- No Court can take cognizance of any offense under this Act after the expiry of one year from the date on which the offense is alleged to have been committed.
731627 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#7
yahan tuk ki bhairon singh ne lawyer ko bataya bhi tha ki humari bete jagdish ka baal vivah hua tha
731627 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#8
aasha ek thread mein australia law ki bahut baat ho rahi thi .darasal australia mein de facto relation ship hota hai jo ki australia mein ek traditional practice hai jisme do unmarried couple ek saath ek hi roof mein rehte hain .australian law de facto relation ship ki permission deti hai pur condition yeh hoti ki couple ek saath ek hi roof ke under kitne saal rahe aap ek doosra ka kitna care karte ho in sub baaton ko dhyan mein hi rakh kur de facto relation ship ko legal maana jata hai .de facto mein chunki unmarried couple ek saath rehte hain isliye interference ka koi sawaal nahi paida hota .pur de facto relation ship aur illegal marriage mein farak hai .foreign mein koi bhi bina divorce liye koi bhi doosri shaadi nahi kur sakta. de facto mein mein male partner ko de facto husband kehte hain aur female partner ko de facto wife kehten hai.pur yeh de facto relation ship ki legality tubhi tuk rehti hai jub tuk de facto husband aur de facto wife australia mein rehte hain .

doosri baat ki agar koi girl jaante hui bhi shaadi shuda ladke se shaadi karti hai to baad mein pehli wife se divorce ho bhi jaaye to bhi second wife ancestral property pur claim nahi kar sakti aur naa hi uski koi suntaan .woh apne husband ke self accquired property pur claime kar sakte hain.

teesri baat marriage certificate bus yeh proove karta hai ki yeh pair shaadi shuda hain.pur yeh nahi prove karta ki pair ki shaadi legal hai.
Edited by surabhi01 - 13 years ago
Chytra thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#9

PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR ILLEGAL SECOND WIFE AND ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN

After the passing of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 a prohibition was imposed on the Hindus to enter into second marriage during the life time of the spouse. The personal law of Hindus to that extent ceases to have effect. The Act had over riding effect and the Personal Law of Hindus in so far as the marriage are concerned stood amended in terms of the Act. Therefore second marriage of a Hindu during the life time of the spouse is prohibited and such a marriage was declared as void.

A son born to the said void marriage was deprived of a right under the Traditional Hindu Law because the provisions of the Act, excluded the application of personal law in this regard and under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, for short hereinafter referred to as "Succession Act", because he was not a legitimate son.

In respect of such property, accordance with the provisions of Sections 8 and 15 of the Succession Act, the illegitimate children could only inherit property of the father. The property of the father's parents or first wife cannot be claimed in any condition. The second wife cannot claim his property but only can claim maintenance. Her children will not be able to file a suit for the property until the husband dies.The illegitimate son is not a coparcener. He has no right in coparcenary property. However, he has a right in the share of the father in coparcenary property. That right he can exercise only on his father dying intestate. He has no right by birth in the separate or self acquired property of his parents. His right accrues only after his parents die intestate. Therefore, a son born of void or voidable marriage(illegitimate son) can never maintain a suit against his/her parent in respect of the property of his or her parent during their life time.



so in this case

1. gauri can only claim maintenace from jagat and she will not get a pnny from haveli

2. Her children, if any would only inherit jagat's property and they have right on any other's property.

3. jagat has no right on the property as it is not ancestral. The sole rights belong to dadisa, after her death bhairon and basant. If dadisa fails to right a will then jagat can ask for his share as it comes under ancestral property but with the clause that the property only dadisa earned not combined with basant and bhairon


Chytra thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

Why would Gauri go to jail😕



Because she might not know the legality of their wedding but She fooled the law by marrying a married man. She can fake that she didn't even know that he is married when he married her.

But she didn't serve the 30 days notice period which is mandatory and a special clause is present in the marriage application form that when signing you will accept the terms and conditions specified. And it is clearly mentiond that failing to oblige so will end you up in prison.

and next bribing a govt worker for falsifying is also a punishable offense. These two reasons are not counted as small offense when a legal wife is in picture. If at this comes out all the milk will be spilt. These two can say good bye to better future.

The marriage certificate they are showing now is void under all the above mentioned clauses and as of now their status is illegal.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".