Posted:
I really fail to understand why there has to be so much hue and cry for Sameer's character that he needs to be liked, respected, appreciated, loved... Tell me one reason that there is positive trait in Sameer character, I would worship that character for rest of my life, why this obssesion for a pscyho character, who resorts to any cheap antics to has his way, yet a group of supporters preach he needs to loved and not bashed.
Is it for the first time we are seeing a negative character disliked by audience or members here ? It is common phenomenon that a villian character would be hated and dislked to the core, at least a sane person would certainly do. Shouldn't we call a pscyho character as psycho ? I suppose he is not a saint to give some respect, would that become bashing ? Why this preachng going on that we need to like Sameer forcibly ? Nobody is bashing or saying anythign ill of Mrunal... It is the character which is spoken about, so what is wrong in that ?
If a negative character or the villian of the show garners a significant fan following, then does it mean that others should seal their mouth because that certain group loves him ? I certainly would not, it is freedom of speech and nobody can curb that.
Or, have we entered an era where bad boys should be loved more than good boys ? If Ravan had kidnapped sita, would there be a section still saying his character should be liked and don't ever call him psycho or a cheapo because we love him whatever he does we support because it is our POV.
Will we be ever differentiate between a positive character and a negative character ?
No matter what science has made progress nobody can stop sun rise and sun set, similarily nobody can stop audience from disliking negative characters, so please stop preaching to love sameer!!!
Anupamaa
Pocket Mein Aasman
Cricket
