zaabemard thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#1
The emphasis on versatility is overdone. Why would anyone want to be a jack of all trades and master of none? If you want mastery of something, you have to focus on it and refine it for years and years. If you want to be everything, you'll just be mediocre at everything.

Yes, for a TV audience it would be boring to see someone do the same dance each time, but that doesn't mean a hip-hop person should force bharatnatyam.

Is Remo willing to get up there and do some kathak in full costume? We'll see how good he is. Is Geeta willing to get up there and do an aerial act? We'll see how good she is. Is Terrence willing to get up there and do some hardcore hip hop? We'll see how good he is.

Created

Last reply

Replies

29

Views

3.6k

Users

16

Likes

56

Frequent Posters

..DamonCrazy.. thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago
#2
i agree...ya trying to attempt a new form once in a while is fine, but wats wrong wit doing ur own style max amount of time.
zaabemard thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#3
Versatility would matter more if this was a competition to pick an actor/actress, but it is not - it is a dance competition and none of these people is really going to make it in acting so why judge them on that.
gilmores thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 13 years ago
#4
Well I think versatility is important in a dance competition also. If the contestants keep doing the same thing again and again it's boring for us and for them too I feel. In a competition, if you want to shine and stand out, you gotta push the envelope, test your boundaries.
Versatility has nothing to do with attemting different styles. Versatility is all about doing different styles WELL. Well being the key word.
If dancer A presents something new every week and performs beautifully and dancer B does the SAME thing every week (but is damn good at what he/she does), I think dancer A has the upper hand over dancer B and deserves to win more than dancer B.
Anyways this season, hardly any dancers can be called versatile. Most of them have stayed in their comfort zones.
EDIT: I don't mean to say versatility is the end-all be-all of dance and that you're a bad dancer if you're not versatile. Some people just aren't. Its okay..not the end of the world.
Edited by chocolover89 - 13 years ago
-desigirl- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#5
versatility does matter coz it's a dance show, dance including all styles
it would be something different if it was contemporary competition or hip-hop competition or whatever ... but it's not .. DID is a dance show where they perform every type of styles so you cannot have one contestant doing different styles while one keeps doing the same style every week
and in other hand if every contestant did their forte every week then it wouldn't be a competition anymore coz you cannot say a good hiphopper is better than a good contemporary dancer or viceversa
EDIT: i forgot to mention .. when you said a master needs years and years you're right .. but a master is done after a general career and not jump into a master directly
Edited by -desigirl- - 13 years ago
zaabemard thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#6
Should Michael Jackson have been asked to sing ghazals to prove his greatness?
-desigirl- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: zaabemard

Should Michael Jackson have been asked to sing ghazals to prove his greatness?

you cannot compare a legend that had his own style and had a profession to a youngster thats still learning how to dance and is in a dance competition ... funny😆
EDIT ... Should a surgeon prove to a medical student that he's a doctor by taking the same exams and practicals the student is taking? or should the student not know anything they learn in a medical career coz he just wants to do master in surgery? why can't people do medical masters withoout doing general medicine first ? uhmmm wonder why
just another funny comparison added to yours😆
Edited by -desigirl- - 13 years ago
zaabemard thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#8
Actually, I want to see Anup Jalota battle it out with Jay-Z and Kanye West in free style rap.
Rapier thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: chocolover89

Well I think versatility is important in a dance competition also. If the contestants keep doing the same thing again and again it's boring for us and for them too I feel. In a competition, if you want to shine and stand out, you gotta push the envelope, test your boundaries.

Versatility has nothing to do with attemting different styles. Versatility is all about doing different styles WELL. Well being the key word.
If dancer A presents something new every week and performs beautifully and dancer B does the SAME thing every week (but is damn good at what he/she does), I think dancer A has the upper hand over dancer B and deserves to win more than dancer B.
Anyways this season, hardly any dancers can be called versatile. Most of them have stayed in their comfort zones.
EDIT: I don't mean to say versatility is the end-all be-all of dance and that you're a bad dancer if you're not versatile. Some people just aren't. Its okay..not the end of the world.


Bingo! I'm actually very sick of hearing the masters say "at least you've attempted a different style" or "i know this is not your forte, so what you did was good." Forte or not... When you are in a competition and want to prove that you are dancing star, you have to MAKE every dance style your forte. Merely attempting it doesn't satisfy. I am hopeless in dancing. Would I be considered good if I just "attempted" hip hop? i think not! the grading criteria should not change according to the contestants' prior knowledge/skill in that dance form. It is unfair.

@topic: Some of these dancers aspire to become top choreographers. So I think it is very important for them to learn and understand different dance forms and know them well. Secondly, I think versatility should be a criteria for the judging of the dancers because, like Chocolate said above, it is easier to judge which dancer is better. If one dancer can master more than one style as opposed to another who can only do one, I think the former deserves to win.
BLR_babe thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 13 years ago
#10
versatility is important but is not determining ... a person should always try atempt new things otherwise they become complacent .. Actor is a good one if he can attempt various emotion and roles .. singer becomes good when they can be at least attempt different styles and tempos .. a musician may not know all how to play differnt instrument but must able understand music in all different forms ..
Since its a competition a better dancer is the one who can try differnt style and at least attempt a good job

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".