Hi Tanya,I'm fine. What about you? How are your husband and your amazing sons?I'm trying to get into the Christmas spirit.😆I agree with you about the storyline and especially the separation track. Ekta wants to show how a separation affects a relationship (or something of that nature she said in an interview about the leap).Why is a separation necessary to show how a relationship evolves over time? Even if she wanted to show a separation, why such a long one? Ekta's mind sure works different to most of us.I also agree that the trp's show viewers distaste with the fact that the evil ones get away scot free, while the good ones suffer. Even if Dharmesh doesn't return now, we still didn't get to see him suffer the way Archana, Manav, and the other good characters have suffered.I also don't like how the CV's are portraying Archana still. After 18 years, anybody would have learnt and grown from their experiences. Yet they show her still pining after Manav as if she's a newly wed woman. They show Manav's character growing, but not Archana's...why? People are saying she should have tried to get in touch with Manav and find out how the twins and he are doing. What about Manav trying to get in touch with Archana too? The situation they are in demands action from both parties.I hope the CV's don't take as long as the last leap to reveal the new dynamics. They don't have the luxury of time. The trp's are telling them that, and as you always say, nothing speaks to Ekta more than numbers!