Originally posted by: lashforever
awwww now u guys have got me into an arguing mode😊😊😊...i am totally against those pictures...personally i think what can be achieved with vulgarity can also be achieved without.😕 yes, the dress combined with her pose and the words written did call for comments....😡
besides she was supposed to get engaged right? she comes from a middle
class background where her father cannot accept these norms of life;
and, if you talk about her upper class in-laws, Indian society has
progressed to allow freedom to their bahus but not modelling for
lingeries.
even among mordern acting families that you see today, once the girl is
engaged or to-be married and settle down, they are not allowed to dress
as provocatively as previously...kajol was in the heights of her career
when she opted for marital bliss...however, the devgans were very
particular about what she wore and how she acted...same for karisma,
madhuri, juhi, sonali, raveena etc etc ......malaika arora & yana
gupta are an exception, that is why in more than 2 interviews i
have seen malaika being asked the same question "your husband does not
have
any qualms about this?" "your in-laws dont mind?"yana is not an
indian...
probably you would need to turn the tables around and ask if you would
like to see your fiancee's pose for a boxer shorts ad all over
town....not many would....😕😕😕
Lash, I am with you. We are not talking about Mallika or Pamela. We are talking about Jassi. I was really not happy to see Jassi's face on that body. Not at all..