Why not a girl child?

Page

riyya6

@riyya6

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

guys im a bit confuse,, if at all cv had planned the leap earlier, why cv did not bring in a baby girl instead of boy... it will make more sense as Kn or members at TN except kriya will neglect the child...

n this makes sense with pratigya wat ever decision...but having a baby boy with all this pratz decision with how KN letting his son to be with PRATZ is a very big ???????

I really dun get it...

Quote

Frequent Posters

Muskaan

@Muskaan92

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

Absolutely!! Even I thought that cvs would b showing that Kesar gives birth to a girl. It would have been more interesting since SS always wanted a POTA and then Pratigya stood for her. In this way, they could have shown Gender-bias issue too.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

riyya6

@riyya6

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: kriyadiwani
Absolutely!! Even I thought that cvs would b showing that Kesar gives birth to a girl. It would have been more interesting since SS always wanted a POTA and then Pratigya stood for her. In this way, they could have shown Gender-bias issue too.

more interesting is pratz say she will not have any baby then... 😕... as ss will want a heir...

Quote

Muskaan

@Muskaan92

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

But Samar is already there for him as heir.

Quote

riyya6

@riyya6

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: kriyadiwani
But Samar is already there for him as heir.

i mean if at all from the very beginning samar is not there... baby girl...

Quote

Muskaan

@Muskaan92

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

Ok ya. We can expect such issues from MKAP. Its a unique show and they should hav shown Kesar's girl child and then a strong Kesar who fights for her.

Quote

rashida

@kupkakes

Voyager

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

yeah me also dont get that

Quote

Why not a girl child?

Related Topics

Explore Topics