Originally posted by: tinoo
roopashetty - completely agree -- i am also surprised that she would leave the children without any other supervisory arrangement, knowing that mai hates these children.
i really was upset when she decided to give mukta to tappu too (before her delivery when she went to see tappu).
If it was her own biological child, would she have given it to tappu so easily?
Then why try to offload mukta onto tappu? and that too when there was no compulsion to offload the child. Veer had already agreed to legally adopt the child. Should she not have asked veer atleast? No, she independently went to tappu's and tried to offload the child onto tappu.
tinoo,u said ur a european but u have settled in India beacuse u love India.I appreciate you for that.But maybe you are still not so aware about indian families.It is very common to share even one of your biological child with a close relative or a sister if they have none.I have many uncles,aunts, brothers sisters who are adopted in such way.You are talking about offloading,here we do it legally also which actually shifts all the rights of biological parents to adopting parents.iccha had 2 kids and third on the way which also went normal as we all know.So as an indian she thought of sharing it with the person she still calls her sister even after so many ups and downs.This thing can only happen in India.
Here we fight for kids custody after divorce while after MJs death the mother of the kids(leaving aside the one whose mother is not known)said she cant keep the kids.So India is completely different in every aspect.So it is INDIA.
We love to own but we also love to share.
As far as the other allegation is concerned I wont comment as I know ki sauteli maa ya moo boli maa agar kalejaa bhi nikaal kar de de to logo ko usme swarth hi nazar aata hain.
Edited by payalgarg - 13 years ago