Tapasya is tapasya she can not and will not change...she proved the core of the person does not change no matter how much happiness she gets in life, her hatred for Ichcha is not over, her repentence was not true...just by not listening about ichcha she is trying to avoid her hatred she has not dealt with it nor overcome it by her true repentence/realization whatever happened in her life she was responsible...she made yet another insensitive mistake and tells Veer the same jap "joh hum karteh woh galat hee nahee hotah"
Nani informed ichcha's child died yet she went to bundela house to give invitation - what drove her to give the invitation is remembering Mai giving her ashirwaad "tumhe bhee ichcha kee tarah ma banneh ka sukh mileh" and the last time she saw Veer on the road...
Tapasya will always remain insensitive to others feeling especially Ichcha...
Question:
- what was more insensitive Ichcha going and offering Mukta
- Tappu going and inviting bundelas for namkaran knowing that Veecha lost their child
- Whose intention was good ichcha's or tappu's or both were wrong for the above 1 & 2
Lets see what justification we get after the precap conversation between Veer and Tappu...why Veer decides to go for the namkaran will Ichcha ask him to go for namkaran or will it be decision on Mai/Dadaji/Umed or just Veer