6th September : - Satyabhama demands Parijat tree - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

12

Views

4.8k

Users

7

Likes

35

Frequent Posters

Krinya thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 13 years ago
#11
liked the epi...but it was better if they showed parajit flower story in detail...when did krishna gave it to rukmani or jambavati? why can't they shoot these scenes? good to see SB as normal, her attitude drives me mad 😡 she has a problem with almost everything that krishna or his wives do...she behaves like a nursery kid and her voice is also the same 😆

also, the entire background of battlefield, garden etc. is not real, they r animated or whatever..i think all the money is being spent there...
246851 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: _Vrish_

Another thing I forgot to mention - Krishna and Satyabhama entered Dwarka in their chariot (whatever happened to Garuda?), but the other 16,000 just followed him on foot, in a procession. 😲 Guess Krishna would have had to loan everybody's chariot in order to give them a smooth transport. That's why I'd have preferred Bhagadatta to send them on all those 4-tusked elephants.

Pradhyumna's wife Mayavati was his wife from his previous birth, Rati, who got there b'cos she was looking for Kama, who Pradhyumna was reborn as after Shiva had incinerated him. But I had no idea that Usha was older than Anirudha.

Tan, recall how in the Ramayan, b4 the Rama-Hanuman battle, Narada did what he could to get the king of 'Kashi' into trouble w/ Vishwamitra, and ultimately, his acts of trying to save him led to the Rama-Hanuman confrontation? That time, when Narada remarked that there would be anarth on earth, Mahadev got furious and told him that he was the cause of all this. 😆 I just wish Vishnu-Lakshmi, who are sitting in Vaikuntha watching all this, give Narada a strong rebuke for inciting Satyabhama 😆 PNPC? 🤣 First time I've heard this term used in the context of Narada 😆



yeah i know about kamdev and rati, but if we leave aside the reincarnation thing and look purely as a normal incident, u cannot deny, those guys were pretty forward, i mean kaha unlogon aur kaha demi moore aston kutcher 🤣

actually i wanted the elephant and bhagadatta scenes too, bhagadatta was a very strong warrior, Vishnu worshipper, and yet it did not stop him from joining kauravas, he should be an interesting character, not the typical bhakt type, bhagdatta and his army of battle elephants are worth seeing.

LOL; well its the one thing that came to my mind, narada is the king of stirring up trouble or rather the God of, although most of the time there would be some very deep purpose,i guess he is just an instrument of Bg V and his mischievous ways.
246851 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: _charu_

also, the entire background of battlefield, garden etc. is not real, they r animated or whatever..i think all the money is being spent there...


they should fire the sfx team then, spending so much money and yet such lousy effects, we can all make out its so crappy.

When they didnt have money and technology they came up with much more innovative and believable special effects.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".