Are Dil nd Dimaag Mutually Exclusive?

Are dil nd dimaag mutually exclusive?Does taking decision wid either one negate d other? 😕

IMV is highly admired 4 his brains, but whatever decisions nd moves he makes r totally devoid of d feelings of d heart. He's able to be ruthless nd unscrupulous nd make all his diabolic moves coz he doesn't hv a conscience which plays an important part in making any decisions.

Also those who make decisions with their heart often end up loosing nd looking foolish. Two cases come to mind. 1^st being d case of D. Whn she rightfully got back d Swing Air deal, she handed it back 2 IMV saying dat she too wants it to be d launching pad for Sid as it would totally be Sid's project. By doing dis she lost d golden opportunity of bailing her company CP enterprise, at d same time proving her mantle of an able businesswoman. Now she's simply playing second fiddle 2 V in his Mumbai Floats project nd infact her efforts nd hard work r in jeopardy, just coz V isn't able to distance his inner turmoil regarding S frm his dream project. It maybe a phase dat will pass or else D will make it a success on her own, which she is capable of. But d fact remains dat it is V's project nd she is at d mercy of his whims nd fancies instead of being d boss.

Similarly S chose 2 leave V, coz she thought with her heart nd apart frm being black mailed by IMV did not want 2 create a rift between V nd his family. As she herself had said, dat she could easily finance V if she so wanted nd V could hv gone on to build another successful business, but she didn't 'tht would hv been thinking with her head, but she chose to think wid her heart nd lost V.

The only exception being whn V acquired d land 4 Mumbai Floats. In tht scenario both heart nd head came into play nd d outcome was one of satisfaction for both d parties involved.😊

Originally posted by: intruderfast

u opened a topic wow😆😆 its a tough qs , i need some more yrs of experience to answer this qs

ok will comment later right now making post on vv😆

it depends on the situation i think, but in today's age one should use its head first

Originally posted by: simran777

...as our proper daily function--controlled by the healthy balance of our respective hemispheres...can somehow parallel this to Left vs Rt handed people (the majority being one/the other ; success in respective workfields ex.Rt=creativity), and yet exists the state of Ambidexterity (usage of both hands)..can kinda derive it as ability of extracting the "best of both worlds"~~highly admirable...likewise perhaps key of success may not be One Always over-powering the other, but rather in their play of balance according 2 wat the situation demands...

EXCELlent topic i must say!

perhaps a coincidence of symolism IMV actually wears the "eye-glasses (handicap of one'z natural vision)"

The Physical Divider in their Room (placed by IMV):

"Bhitar koi masla nahi, jo bhi jung hai woh bahar hai...kheyr, agar hum ek dujje ki baat samaj pahte toh hamare bich woh parda nahi hota"...Mr.Man's bottled up inner-self settles scores only w what his vision allows...the external battles...

conclusively again i think/believe (lol) 'tis best done according 2 what the situation/person(s) of the situation demands~~however, due the biast of our lens (although All-most of us strive 2 take decisions via the Most Promising paths...naturally to reap the Most "fruit-full results"), we block/supress our capacity to do so, hence due the very fog of this vision aka bias of our lens, we often fail 2 see all the colors of the rainbow..

..that said..

~i'm not done with all the rainbows, not just yet...there must be more in the sky!...i'm sure of it!!~Harmoni:-)

Originally posted by: sonali.19281

Munira: If I think physiologically.. heart is just a manpower center.. it cant THINK or DECIDE..it just receives the signals of the brain.. its the different sections of the brain the react to rationalte, emotions if you will.. stress etc.. and obv the balance and the battle between the lobes is extremely individualistic..

enough of my gibberish coming to your figurative questions.. Loved it.. coz I am all for decision making.. 😉 put can I rub it in.. b4 I try making sense😆

He's able to be ruthless nd unscrupulous nd make all his diabolic moves coz he doesn't hv a conscious which plays an important part in making any decisions.

And you question my love for S.. how can u underestimate your love.. gahhh .. ok moment of backhanded compliment over.. well in reality its not ying yang in decision making where one is only ruled by emotions vs logic.. its always a balance.. and in all the cases you sighted whether its Ds or S neither of the decisions were impulsive and based on only sentiments.. it was extremely conscious and thought out.. yet brain decided.. D or S loss tht you put forth was definitely known to them.. in spite of that they stood for their conviction.. both are on some levels in peace with it.. and thats what matters..😉 sleeping well at night.. In all 3 cases D, S, IMV they easily make those decisions coz they live by their convictions.. so there is hardly a conflict

but one thing I defo give credit to IMVs mental gymnastics.. is the weighing out the effects.. when one decides logically esp in case of a mental conflict.. btw your conviction (due to emotions, persona etc) vs logic and feasibility.. Logic has an upmanship on ONE COUNT.. coz it takes into count the reaction from the world.. A decision made on convictions sometimes may not get the desired effect from others coz they dont need to abide by your sentiments (what we call taking advantage and losing propositions) .. but when you put logic in front you would take the cons into account..

But in case of D/S they still went with conviction KNOWING it may not meet the desired effect.. may not come across as a globally smart move but its a personal prerogative and hence BANG ON👍🏼