Created

Last reply

Replies

14

Views

1.8k

Users

6

Likes

34

Frequent Posters

pakhara thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#11
^^Thank you so much for replying di! 🤗

Yes di, I agree with you.

I wish that I had put the entire thing as it was, but if I did that, then my fingers would have fallen off from typing all of that.😆 The pursuit of worldly knowledge isn't necessarily bad, but the pursuit of material happiness is. That's what I meant by materialism. Medical research and engineering is no doubt a good thing, actually medical science goes perfectly with the whole idea since it's helping life here, but we have less of that and more of a negative development.😔 If someone learns about the self, then they will have very little reason to cheat others because then they'll realize that everyone else is equal to them because of the fact that they, and I'm going to use his apparent favorite words, "a part and parcel of God." 😊That's why he said that there should be some sort of real spiritual schooling in the modern world. And not the phoney baloney stuff we get everywhere.

And yeah, my Dad wouldn't like it if I started bad-mouthing science in general either. He's a scientist himself.😆

Edited by AishuJSKfan - 14 years ago
ShivangBuch thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#12
😊@Rehan

Prabhupada: "The politicians have no sympathy or compassion. They do not consider that the hard-earned money is coming from the public and that they are spending it by shooting big rockets off to other planets. Al they do is promise to bring back more dust. First, they may get a handful of dust; then they promise to bring back tons of dust. What is the meaning of all this?"

In the original para of Pujya Prabhupadji before the question of Dr Singh, there is no mention of production of weapons or national security. There is only mention of Production of Rockets for finding life in other planets. So there is no debate actually at all of national security need. In fact the title itself says 'HERE IS LIFE' so think about it and save it. Protect it and uplift it. (So there shouldn't be any conflict with the concept of self defense).


Prabhupada: "They may believe or not believe-what is the gain? What we do know is that life is here. They know this, yet they are engaged in fighting and in killing life. Here is life. Here is a human being. Life is here undoubtedly. But they are busy tring to destroy it with their big bombs. This is their scientific advancement."

Now this is written not from independent nation's point of view as an answer perhaps (At least from where I can see it). Even he would acknowledge the need of production of the weapons to the extent of national security. This is written from the point of view of world at large. From humanity's POV. Here 'THEY' doesn't mean political leaders of India or of 'A' country. Here THEY means politicians of the world. It includes those who initiate wars (Kauravas) and not just Arjun (who gather weapons just for safety but are otherwise peace-lovers). And probably when this sentence was said, today's terrorism was not on the surface and countries had danger from other countries only - politicians only.

Had that been told from individual nation's POV only, then Dr Singh could always further argue & Prabhupad kind of knowledgeable person would have easily acknowledged and intellectually agreed to it. The interpretation should be philosophical but we take it or interpret or reply from our practical perspective. The philosophers think beyond practical problems of daily life. For thinking about and worrying about daily practical problems, we all are there. Ya nisha sarva bhootaanaam, tasyaam jaagrati sanyami.



Quoting Krishna's dialog from MB Geeta:

Krishna - Raat-din ki to maine baat hi nahi ki Parth, maine to kewal sone aur jaagne ke vishay me baat ki thi. Saamaanya purush ki jaag har kshan kuchh paane aur bhogne ke moh me vyatit hoti hai. Yahi uski chetna ka laksh hai. Yadi usse bhukh lagi to usse bhojan chaahiye, yadi usse pyaas lagi to usse jal chahiye. Yadi usse rituon se apnaa bachaav karnaa hai to ghar chaahiye, uski soch aatmanishth (Subjective) hai. Parantu muni arthaat sthitapragya ki soch vastunishth (Objective) hai. Woh vyaktigat bhookh aur vyaktigat trishnaa se pare dekhtaa hai. Woh vriksh se gire phal ke baare me nahi sochtaa, woh vriksh ki baare me sochtaa hai. Vano ke baare me sochtaa hai. Saamaanya manushya ko indhan ke liye lakdi chaahiye, to woh vrikshon ko tab tak kaattaa chalaa jaayegaa jab tak van nasht na ho jaaye. Parantu muni, prakriti me vano ke mahatva ke baare me sochtaa hai. Prakriti ke santulan ke vishay me sochtaa hai. Vano aur rituon ke sambandh ke vishay me sochtaa hai. Is liye he Parth, jo saamaanya purush ki indriyon ke liye din hai, woh muni ke liye raat hai, kyunki woh to indriyon ki seema ko paar kar chukaa hai. Aur jo saamaanya purush ki indriya ke liye raat hai, woh muni ke liye din hai. Kyunki ussi sannaate me muni ki chetnaa ka Suryoday hota hai. Muni ki ruchi saamne ki samasyaaon ke saath saath un samasyaaon ke samaadhaan par bhi hai. Aur yehi usse saamaanya purush se alag karti hai Parth.



And the way you interpreted, it reminded me my favourite Garg-Akrur scene dialog of SK.😊

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/chat-clubs/1406166/ramanand-sagars-ramayan-and-shri-krishna-cc-4-done?pn=75


Akrur: Meri dhrishtata kshama karen Gurudev. Aapka kathan satya hai. Parantu keval unke liye jo bhakti maarg ke pathik hain. Jinhone karm se sanyaas le liya hai. Parantu jo karmyogi hain, jinhe saadhaaran janta ke dukh sukh ki chinta karni hai, wo ek aatataayee ke atyaachaar, aur uske vyabhichaar se, maanav samaaj ki rakshaa karna, apna kartavya samajhate hain. Unka dharm ye aagyaa nahi deta ki wo ek kaalpanik vishwaas ka sahaaraa le kar, is prakaar akarmanya ho kar, keval hath par hath dhare, achchha samay aane ki pratiksha karte rahe.


Garg: Haan Akrurji, ye bhi thik hai, jo aap kehte hain. Karmyogi ka yahi dharm hai. Parantu aapki aur hamari baat me keval itna hi antar hai, ki aap jaisa karmyogi, har baat ko keval manushya ki drishti se hi dekhta hai aur keval manushya ki shakti par bharosa rakh kar, apna karm nirdhaarit karta hai. Parantu ham jaise bhakt, keval uski shakti par bharosa rakh kar karm karte hain; jo, manushya ko bhi shakti deta hai. Ham karm to karte hain, parantu apne karm ki, ati sheeghra saphalta ke liye, is tarah bechein nahi hote. Kyun ki ham jaante hain, karm avashya saphal hoga, parantu jab theek samay aayega.

Akrur: Par wo thik samay kab aayega Gurudev? Mujhe to samay haathon se nikalta dikhaayee de raha hai. Gurudev. Mai samajhta hun ki, dono raajkumar ab kishoraavasthaa me hain. Ab unhe Kans se takkar lene ke liye puri taiyaari shuru kar deni chaahiye. Isiliye mai aapki seva me aayaa hun, ki aap hi Vasudevji ko aadesh de sakte hain, ki ab raajkumaron ka samay, yun gaiyaa charaane me barbaad na kiya jaay.

Garg: Unka samay barbaad nahi ho raha Akrurji. Ye samay to unki premleela ka hai.

Akrur: Premleela?!!!!

Garg: Haan.

Akrur: Parantu aaj ki raajneeti me uska prayojan kya hai?

Garg: Uska prayojan hai. Maanav ko ye sikhaanaa hai ki prem ke bina, manushya ka jeevan adhuraa rehta hai. Keval raajneeti jeevan ko puraa nahi karti. Naa hi wo jeevan ka antim lakshya hai. Jeevan ka antim lakshya hai prem. Keval prem. Kyun ki, wahin se bhakti ka raastaa shuru ho jata hai.

Shri Krishna poorna avataar hain. Wo is avataari jeevan me, manushya ko poorna maanav banna sikhaayenge. Samay aane par, wo aapki raajneeti bhi maanav ko sikhaayenge. Yuddh karna bhi sikhaayenge. Shatru ka sanhaar karna bhi sikhaayenge. Nirmaan aur sanhaar, dono leelaayen karenge. Wo maanav ko apne kartavya aur dharm ke liye marnaa bhi sikhaayenge. Shaan se jeenaa bhi sikhaayenge. Yog bhi sikhaayenge. Aur aishwarya ka bhog bhi sikhaayenge. Wo maanav ko ye bhi sikhaayenge ke jeenaa ek kalaa hai. Aur kalaa me saundarya hota hai. So jeevan sundar banaane ke liye wo maanav ko prem karna bhi sikhaayenge.

Akrur: Wo sab to thik hai Gurudev. Parantu aaj ki raajneeti ye keheti hai ki isse pehele Jarasandh, Baanaasur, Kans jaisi teeno shaktiyan mil kar, is dharti ko narak bana de, is samaaj ko nasht kar den, unki shaktion ka ant kar dena chaahiye.


Edited by ShivangBuch - 14 years ago
Rehanism thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#13
Thanks Shivang. That was indeed thoughtful reply. I have never spoken of violence. I spoke of deterrence - of pro-active defense. As for 'shooting off rockets', that is crucial in modern world. Of course when Mr. A.C. 'Prabhupada' Dey was alive, that was the high point of cold-war era where space race was a number game between two superpowers. So I don't complain if he thought space-tech is worthless. But today Space science is no longer a cold-war adventure sport. It has spread its tentacles in every aspect of our life. The mobile we use, the DTH services in our TV, internet services, agriculture, industry and most importantly defense. In today's world no modern defense force can think to operate without satellites and space assets. The world will be blind without space science. People are now contemplating of space-mining in other planets due to increasing scarcity of resources. Space science is no longer a luxury - its a basic necessity for a nation's progress. Prabhupada spoke from his arena - ie religion - I am speaking from the arena of the entire nation, which also includes defense, science and politics besides religion - and none can be downplayed or ignored😊.

Today we have a very gross idea of politics, military and world affair. In politics there is nothing called good and bad. There is no room for compassion, sympathy or sentiments. The same goes for military as well. Its a simple policy of the survival of the fittest. Compassionate and idealistic politicians prove to be blunders for their country and people. They might be good father, good son, good husband etc, but never a good leader. They end up impaled in a bed of arrows or tricked to lay down weapons and then hacked off into pieces or shot from behind when they are fixing their chariot wheel. This happens in all ages. Harsh, but true. 😃

However I have never opposed spiritualism - but today it has become more of ritualism. If India had truly understood the original Vedism or Buddhism, it would have been indeed a first world nation with all-round development, because these two cultures instilled self-faith and proclaimed the divinity within rather than turning people into mindless zombies practicing illogical cults. They were most scientific and progressive cultures, but unfortunately they were short lived and were replaced by idolatry, hollow ritualism and unreasoned regressive faith which strangles every deviation, every argument and every new idea and latches us to illiteracy and blind beliefs. Faith in God has turned into fear of God.😕

Edited by Darklord_Rehan - 14 years ago
Rehanism thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#14
I remember a Rig Vedic hymn from my ISC Physics book - Yojananam Sahastra Dwe Dwe Shate Dwe Cha Yojane Aken Nimishardhena Krammana Namostute - which translates to 'I bow to thee, who covers 2202 yojanas in a second (ie light)'.

In Metric scale, 2202 Yojanas adds up to nearly 3 x 108 m/s. This was the level of our scientific progress in that age. Those people who wrote the ancient scripture must have been themselves the greatest scientific minds of there times. Nobody, however, knows how the Vedic scholars reached such an accurate figure nearly 4000 years back whereas relatively modern Western scientists with modern apparatus fumbled for centuries in determining the speed of light.

The same goes with Buddha. He spoke of wave-particle duality, quantum field, emptiness, relativity, mass-energy equivalence and even spacetime nearly 2400 years before Einstein. While all other medival/modern religions speak of Creation and Creator God, Buddha was the first one to put forward transformation (of matter and energy) and evolution (of body, mind and soul), as he perceived Creationism as a direct violation to the Physical laws (this feeling was shared by the Jains as well).

In my first comment I spoke of the intertwined and inseparable nature of physics and metaphysics. I guess Rig Veda and Buddha are the finest example.

Please watch these videos...Really great in my opinion.

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qj_i7YqDwJA&feature=related[/YOUTUBE]
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlmrHMBW36w&feature=related[/YOUTUBE]

"Buddhism has the characteristics of what would be expected of a cosmic religion of the future; it transcends a personal God, avoids dogmas and theology; it covers both the natural and spiritual and it is based on a religious sense aspiring from the experience of all things - natural and spiritual - as a meaningful unity" - Albert Einstein, 1954, Albert Einstein : The Human Side.
Edited by Darklord_Rehan - 14 years ago
ShivangBuch thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#15
Thanks to you too Rehan. You also made a very good point in fact of resources reducing on the planet earth, etc. So discovering life on the other planets can't just be taken to be activity to establish just the own superiority over other countries or just useless curiosity or activity without purpose in that sense. It is not done to find the life on other planets and enjoy the success or achievement as a time pass hobby but to explore the potential and possibility of life as a substitute of planet earth. Too much far to think for future generations burdening taxes on present generation but then as Lola rightly put, it is all intention that matters and after all, if intention is so far visionary, then possibly it might qualify to be actually in the category of philosopher and far thinker rather than ordinary practical person. Yes you are also right regarding satellites and all that but I didn't mean rocket launching to be useless in that context. I simply wrote my earlier post keeping in mind rocket launching on other planets as a matter of just discovery as a matter of sense of achievement or establishment of supremacy.

But then again, here the spending of so much money is to save life only and not the upgrading of soul. In stead of thinking so much about saving your present life, think about your future lives (That can be the one real possible intention behind the title of this thread). Think about your spiritual level. Think about upliftment in the journey to next birth rather than saving this body when the destruction comes. That could be the broadest message (broader than even that visionary outlook mentioned in the earlier para) of Prabhupadji's words. Spiritual activity is going to help the soul in the next life too. Migration to other planet is not going to (other than the point of saving the knowledge to be carried forward to saved people & species when the destruction comes). And hence this consciousness for spirituality is more crucial to be generated in the future generations' minds than JUST the knowledge of modern science. I am not saying this to you or arguing. Just the further elaboration in link of a possible positive outlook of the topic.

Regarding the science of physics, I also agree that it is connected with Spiritual science. In fact, I would put very clearly that it is not connected but the very part of it as it is nothing but the science of PANCHTATVA mentioned in Geeta (I don't know about Rigved but Geeta is nothing but the essence of Vedas only). Prithvi, Jal & Vayu tatvas are nothing but Solid, Liquid & Air. And the concepts of light & electricity and sound & vacuum are nothing but Agni & Aakaash tatvas respectively. Geetaji has the reference of the science in not just Adhyay 7 of Gyan Vigyan yog but has also been emphasized in a few others as well like Adhyay 13 & 15 to an extent at a couple of places. There are little bit of references in many other Adhyays in fact.

Just as a matter of getting further clarity about your view (without any intention to argue with you about anything or agreeing or disagreeing by continuing it further), I am just curious to know exactly what balance would you like to see between Spiritual Science & Modern Science? 50:50? 75:25 in favour of Spirituality or other way round? 90:10? 10:90? Or are they just one & them same woven in each other for you and nothing different?
Edited by ShivangBuch - 14 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".