Soham is Madhuri's baby

My theory is that Soham is actually Maduri's. Remember she had a condition for Archana b4 agreeing to go to court and state that she was not married to Dharmesh. I think she asked Archana to take care of the baby she was expecting then until she returned. Archana must have as usual fallen for some sob story by Varsha and gave her the baby to take care of until Madhuri returned. Which probably explains Manavs noncomittal attitude in that whole issue. He does not care for Varsha nor anything else to do with Archu's selfish sisters.

I think ur onto something!! That sounds like it makes more sense (altho still illogical) than soham being arman's. But even so, Varsha deserves nothing. 😡

Edit: wait, this is a 4yr leap. If soham was madhuri's kid, he would be older than the kid they show. So I guess this theory is a bust 😕

Possible. But couldn't the condition be that Vaishali will look after Varun. It is mysterious about Mahuri's second child. But didn't she conceive the child as a bone marrow donor for Varun so he could survive the condition?

Agreed. Varsha does not deserve anything. But I will acknowledge that she is being more protective of Soham than Archana even if she has him on a temporary basis. If in fact Madhuri did leave Soham with Archana for safekeeping then Archana has proven she's not so Mahaan afterall because she did not think twice about handing over someone else's child over to her ungrateful sister. Archana still deserves everyones curses too.

Originally posted by: adhewar

Possible. But couldn't the condition be that Vaishali will look after Varun. It is mysterious about Mahuri's second child. But didn't she conceive the child as a bone marrow donor for Varun so he could survive the condition?

Also since when on these soaps has anything always been logical. Soham may look younger than 4 years but recall how many times Punni and Sachu looked different. Also, The condition of leaving Varun with Vaishali may not necessarily be the only condition. The condition was never explained. I think Mads left Varun with Dharmesh because at the time he could afford to pay for Varuns treatment and she left the baby with A because V was also preggers and had her hands full. This way they could still have access to the baby for bone marrow treatments.

Makes Sense too ... but then why isnt Dharmesh reacting? As much as we know Dharmesh ... that fellow is just not gonna do any favours on Archana-Manav or Satish.

Not sure but this could be the case too

I don't think so...If soham is mathuri's son ,then he must have the same age of that of Vaisu's son...But they are not on same age...

Originally posted by: parri814

My theory is that Soham is actually Maduri's. Remember she had a condition for Archana b4 agreeing to go to court and state that she was not married to Dharmesh. I think she asked Archana to take care of the baby she was expecting then until she returned. Archana must have as usual fallen for some sob story by Varsha and gave her the baby to take care of until Madhuri returned. Which probably explains Manavs noncomittal attitude in that whole issue. He does not care for Varsha nor anything else to do with Archu's selfish sisters.

but archana inromo said that soham mera beta
if so then archana maight have not used word my son na

Archana at first adopted Soham from Madhuri for herself, then realized that Varsha needs a child too and decided to give Soham for some time.