The Temporary baby

Page

Next Last

koolsadhu1000

@koolsadhu1000

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 14 years ago

While the show ceases to interest me , it never fails to stun me . Coz I hear new new things every day ...they break grounds and heights of foolishness and stupidities .

Seems from the Pre Cap that the baby has been given 'temporarily' . This is evenmore terrible. When you give up your child it is bad enough , but when you give it up temporarily for some years or months to another woman you only end up confusing that child and hindering its mental peace . Confused , the child does not understand who his natural parents are .The mixed signals and change as parents can have drastic on the child's mental development .

Of the two Evils , giving up for good is better . This is far worse .

I hope Archana Karanjkar does not get that baby back . I request CVS to do that .

One more thing CVS . We are tired of seeing Manav apologise to Archana all the time for his job . I agree that its his mistake today but what I gather from whats being shown is that his job is demanding and he really cannot make time for all these things that Archana demands . If he is managing that end , she should manage this end well . Why go to Varsha and waste time ? Go and Fetch Sachu yourself . You are not doing a job . Don't you know how busy your husband is ?

Frankly I don't see what big kartoot Archana has done by giving up her baby and being such a sulky nag that she is showered with rose petals and constantly apologised to .

Not many will agree with my opinion and will find it unfair even but thats exactly how I feel . Instead of being proud of Manav's success and being there for him in the real sense by understanding him perfectly that he simply cannot manage time for these things like before , she sulks and taunts and ropes him in constantly for trivial things that she can very well manage on her own ...like Vat Pournima Vrat that does NOT require a husband to break the fast unlike a Karwa Chauth Vrat ...or Mommy's Birthday Party , or Picking up Sachu that She easily can . I find it extremely irritating .

And each argument ends with she hinting he is not like before and him apologising. Why he should be like before is a mystery . He was downright stupid before , he has smartened for the better now and still loves her . Why this does not please her god knows .

Manav should ask her once What the hell should he do to prove he is like before ...Should he give up his job and stand with bOWED head once more before her maayka and live in glorious poverty .

What he should most definetely stop apologising for his job . Its high time Archana apologises for a change .

Edited by koolsadhu1000 - 14 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

@putturani

Dazzler

Posted: 14 years ago

Agree with you Kools but I fear this post will be unpopular again. I agree that giving up a child temporarily is disastrous to the child. But strangely I know two real-life examples (sisters in a large family) of children who were temporarily given to another family. In both cases it worked well with no ill-effects for the child. The second case was like PR - the mom started crying and asking for the baby back. But just because it CAN happen once in a blue moon in real life does not mean that this track is not 100% ridiculous and disgusting.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Nikita Lakhe

@nikitagmc

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 14 years ago

You are bang on right Kools! Even I'm finding the temporary baby track very stupid, if that is what the CV's want to show. Means when baby has started getting attached to one mother and feels comfortable and safe with her, you give it away to another? Uff...

However, most probably it will be something like Varsha wanted Soham to stay with her for a few days and now she has got attached and doesn't want to give him back. But even then, is it right for a 2 year old to be left alone, away from Mommy?

If Archana and Varsha really want to 'share' the baby- then Archana Manav Satish and Varsha should start living together.

The CV's are now basically scared of the furore, they know their TRP's will drop, and they are now trying to save their leads by introducing such tracks. They did this after divorce too, by showing Manav didn't marry Shravani cos KAka died- again, height of stupidity. Shravani Manav had no problems getting married after Sachin's death, but they chose to mourn Kaka's death. Eh! How silly!

Anyway, will wait till next episode to show how the creatives cover up their MAJOR goof up this time and what exactly they want to show. Who knows maybe we are thinking and speculating too much... whatever... CV's ki halat dekhke maza aya... mujhe to bahut maza aya... HEE HEE HAA HAA!!!

Am still waiting to see Manav-Dharmesh showdown. I have been told Sushant rocked today and looked 'killing'. But Video is not loading. :-( By the way, how come you didn't comment on that scene?

Where Archana-Manav matter is concerned, this is what I posted in another thread::::

I felt that it was mistake of both of them. Archu was going to meet Soham. She could have gone after picking Sachu from school. It was not an appointment or something that she cannot go at any other time than that particular time only. On the other hand, how can Manav come in the middle of office work at 3 o clock? He is at a high post of Supervisor and responsible for many things and remains busy- he might even forget. She should have asked someone else or gone to meet Soham a little later.

Manav's mistake was that he should have told her clearly- listen i might be busy at that time since it will be office hours for me or i might forget, so please tell baba/aai or go to meet soham a bit late. And still if he agreed to go, then he should have made a note or kept it in mind that he has to go pick his son. One cannot be careless in such matters.

Edited by nikitagmc - 14 years ago

Quote

koolsadhu1000

@koolsadhu1000

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 14 years ago

Puuturani , once in a blue moon is RIGHT . Children go to therapy coz they are confused with the step mothers and step fathers waltzing in and out of their lives . This affects their sense of security ...its NOT ADVISED . I dont care if my post is unpopular ...I put up with archana's silly handling of DEPRESSION ...I cannot swallow this playing around with a baby's life .

Quote

koolsadhu1000

@koolsadhu1000

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 14 years ago

niki I am pissed . Expecting Manav to come at 3 or 4 in the afternoon when she can easily go to meet Soham AFTER picking him up is downright annoying . My husband wud flip his lid if I expected this from him when there is NO EMERGENCY .

I find the Karanjkar daughters extremely spoilt , period . And Archana , like Varsha Vaishu , wants CONSTANT pampering which bugs the hell out of viewers like me .

Manav has fired Dharmesh WELL . But what I fear is Dharmesh will turn IAGO and remember IAGO was responsible for Othello's DEATH . I dont want DK to die and Manav to be poor EVER .

Quote

@putturani

Dazzler

Posted: 14 years ago

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000
Puuturani , once in a blue moon is RIGHT . Children go to therapy coz they are confused with the step mothers and step fathers waltzing in and out of their lives . This affects their sense of security ...its NOT ADVISED . I dont care if my post is unpopular ...I put up with archana's silly handling of DEPRESSION ...I cannot swallow this playing around with a baby's life .

Even in the case of adoption (which is a much more natural situation) children go into depression when they are told late in life that they have been adopted. It affects their idea of their personal identity. Now what will Soham feel when he finds out? Inadequate, unloved and unworthy because his own parents did not want him, especially when they had NO EARTHLY REASON to give him up. He will weigh himself against Varsha's smile and find himself lacking.

Quote

Kalapi

@Kalapi

Dazzler

Posted: 14 years ago

Kools u r so right...giving up baby is a very bad idea...no one really can tell the true cost of this will be, often confused/deprived/abused childhood in the West is associated with confused/drug addicted/violent adulthood...hope our wonderful and smart CVs realize what they are showing to the public...equal agree with you abt Manav saying sorry to archana...getting tired of it so:(

Quote

448368

Suspended

Posted: 14 years ago

Kool, did u watch the Manav-Dharmesh convo, it ws the highlight of the epi, worth watching.

Quote

Tanyaz

@Tanyaz

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 14 years ago

Kool, I think the track has been modified ...

They did wanted to do with the baby donation track bu t the way everyone protested , I think they have changed it a bit so It's Ok with me.I know i tsi bad , but for me ...Archana and Manav giving up their son so heatlessly was worse ...

It's a fictional daily show , always competing for TRPs so they can change ..Remember how once Varsha came home and the next episode all was well between her and satish and also the maav Shraavni track tha twas changed the minute TRPs went down ...

Abou their fight..It's Ok kool, If once in a year a wife tells her husband o pick the kid from school then thereis nothing wrong with that and she did not even taunt that much .she was right , manav sould have been more careful...And they immediately hugged and made up and they said their I love yous to each other ...so all 's well now ...

They were both at fault but they both loved making up so that was sweet ...

My only problem today is Dharmesh working i nthe same comapny as Manav ...and Savita getting into the habit of gambling ...

Edited by Tanyaz - 14 years ago

Quote

112642

Suspended

Posted: 14 years ago

#10

This show is a MYSTERY to me.. the sharing of the kid is MOST puzzling.. but of the two women, i would leave the KID with varsha. she is proving to be the BETTER mother and cares for soham as any mother cub would. archana isnt FIT to be the M of the mother..she is a certified looney bin.. husbands, kids, parents ALL are for sharing. then what is "apna"? the shitty karanjkars?

the funny thing is that after archana didnt meet varsha, what DID she DO?? shopping, kitty parties, another meddling spree, wash manju's feet? couldnt she have ccalled manav or left a message saying "hey, i can pick up sachu afterall, not meeting varsha today".. so far i have seen, archana's JOB is to be decked up, travel in cars and expect the IMPOSSIBLE from manav. why cant she handle the household chores. areey, this man works so hard and EVERYONE has a share in his money, cant she share his duties?

it seems as if. she wants manav to her bitcch. that she can lug around showing " look, i pyar him, look he is doing my sapne poore, by roaming around penniless". Manav has understood her needs to retain the past simplicity, by doing special things for her, she should ALSO, embrace the present and futre by contributing in the relationship.

I am not surprised; manav looking at aashna for support: while he has moved on in life and set new goals, archu is stuck in the past of endless imsults, penniless roaming and having him at her beck and call.

Edited by tiya229 - 14 years ago

Quote

1 2 3 4 5 ... 11

The Temporary baby

Related Topics

Explore Topics