Nikhil Banerjee and his interview ...

Guys .... this is about a interview that was given by Nikhil Banerjee, prior to his performance at the Carnegie Hall. This interview became quite controversial because he spoke about the Hindustani classical (north indian classical) and the carnatic (south indian classical) music forms. That part of the interview is highlighted in bold in the first part of the interview. The second and third parts of the interview is posted on Page2 (don't forget to read it as well). I want all of you to express your views on the same, give elaborations and references. Please do not fight or use profanity in praise or criticism.

For those unware, Pandit Nikhil Banerjee was one of the greatest Sitar players to have graced India (world as well) .... for all those who have heard both him and Ravi Shankar ... the debate still rages on as to who's better ....

First part of the interview:

NIKHIL BANERJEE INTERVIEW 11/9/85

Interview by Ira Landgarten, the day before Nikhil Banerjee's last U.S. performance at Carnegie Hall, New York (1986). From booklet accompanying Raga CD-207 (Purabi Kalyan). Copyright 1991 Ira Landgarten.

Interview posted to web by Steve Bahcall at eyeneer...thanks for giving us a web presence as long ago as August '95!

Ira Landgarten: First of all, where and when were you born?

Nikhil Banerjee: I was born in Calcutta in 1931.

What is your background; do you come from a musical family?

I am from a priest class - Brahmin. I am not supposed to take music as a profession. But my father was a musician, my grandfather also used to play sitar, so it was in my family but we are not supposed to take it as a profession.

So they were not professional musicians; what particularly attracted you to sitar?

Because from my very childhood, you know, I don't even remember, because from my very birth I could hear my father practicing. He used to practice daily; that attracted me.

Did he learn from his father?

Yes, and also from other great musicians.

Actually when and how did you begin your musical practice?

You know, it's really a very big subject - you must know the background. First of all, in our family we are not supposed to take up music. So when my father used to practice, I was so attracted and at that time I was maybe four or five years old. I wanted to play but my father never allowed me during that time. And we had a joint family system, that means my father, his brother's wife, grandfather, grandmother, we used to live all together in one house. My grandfather was against these things (music); he thought that if I took it very seriously my educational side would suffer. That was a great problem, so naturally when I actually wanted to play and to learn, everybody discouraged me, especially my grandfather. Being the head of the family each and every member of the family has to obey him. So for a few years I couldn't play, I couldn't touch the instrument. But all the time, whenever my father used to practice, I used to just sit in front of him. Then one day my father was very attracted, he said, "When all the boys are playing outside why are you sitting quietly, why do you listen to my practice?" Then I said I want to play and to learn the sitar. Then he bought me a small sitar when I was around 5 years old. I started learning but not very seriously. After one or two years, when I was seven years old, my father started teaching me very deeply and thought, "Yes, this boy is very much attracted to this music." So then he started teaching me systematically with scales and everything.

I understand that you were considered a child prodigy, winning the All-Bengal Sitar Competition and at age 9 becoming the youngest musician employed by All-India Radio. When did you first perform publicly?

I had my debut at the age of 9. People used to call me a child prodigy; I used to broadcast from the radio, also giving concerts.

Did you tour around India as well?

Not very far, near Calcutta in Bengal State, because at that time I used to go to school and my grandfather was a very, very strict man who would never allow for a single day that I miss my study.

Ustad Faiyaz Khan

Do any recordings of you at that age exist? Were any waxes cut?

No, not at that age, not at 9 years. At that time tape recorders weren't yet invented. Yes, I had a few wax discs in All-India Radio at that time, but you can play them only three or four times.

In any field of art, young artists are influenced by the work of other artists; who were some of the musicians - instrumentalists or vocalists - who influenced you during those formative years?

Naturally I used to go to all these music festivals in India, and I heard great, great musicians of that time. Each musician was simply great; I was very, very influenced by them. At that time it was very difficult to judge who is better and who is not, but each and every musician influenced me like anything! Especially, during that time I heard Omkarnath Thakur, Faiyaz Khan, Kesarbai, Roshanara, and in instrumental music naturally Allauddin Khansahib. But it was like a dream that I would be able to go very close to them because it was very unexpected during that time. My background was not from a professional musician's family, so it was almost a dream!

Does your music today directly or indirectly reflect some of those influences?

Yes, of course! To be very frank, yes, I'm very much influenced by a few musicians. One thing my teacher Allauddin Khansahib used to say, he being a very conservative musician, but he always used to say, "Collect anything, good thing, from any music from anywhere in the world!" Allauddin Khansahib being such a strict and conservative type, every night I can very well remember, every night from 9 till 11 o'clock. All-India Radio used to broadcast Western classical music. And every day from 9 till 11 he used to hear that, and he liked that Western classical music so much that he used to say, "Just listen to this music, how much they have perfected a note! Each note correct and so much in tune!" In that respect he used to always say that you should collect and get whatever you get from anybody, from anywhere in the world. So naturally, I used to hear all kinds of music but two musicians have influenced me very much in my life: naturally one is Allauddin Khansahib; I consider him as really incomparable. Depth! It is all interlinked; as a man, as a musician, so kind-hearted to everybody, every animal, each thing was considered, and each thing has touched my heart. Such a great in every respect! I'm also very much influenced by, and have learned from Ali Akbar Khan. I consider him one of the greatest living musicians of the world! And in vocal music, Amir Khansahib.

Ustad Amir Khan

Many people in India have told me these things, but I know myself very well I am very much influenced by Amir Khan, because in my childhood, before I went to Maihar, he used to come to my house regularly to teach my sister. My sister perhaps is one of the oldest students of Amir Khansahib when nobody knew him! I'm talking about 1946-47; at that time Amir Khan was not very well known in India. But he used to teach my sister regularly, and when he used to teach, I used to sit there and I was very influenced.

Did you have any other teachers before you went to Baba? Pandit Jnan Prakash Ghosh has written in his music memoirs that you received thorough initial training from Mushtaq Ali Khan.

Padmavibhushan Allauddin Khan

Now let me tell you: we were almost you could say poor. I'm from a very poor family; poor means financially because we were twelve brothers and sisters, and my father was the only earning member, so naturally my father couldn't afford much money to pay for my lessons. In my childhood, many of my father's musician friends used to come to the house, and as I used to play as a very young boy, they used to say, "Come let us sit. Come, bring your instrument, let me hear what your are playing." And he used to teach something; in that respect I have learned from many people, but not very seriously and not very regularly. I learned from Mushtaq Ali Khan for three months only. Though my father was an amateur musician, he learned from one of Mushtaq Ali Khan's father's students for some time-Ashiq Ali Khan. So when my father approached Mushtaq Ali Khan, first he agreed and then he actually said, "No, I'm not going to teach him." Then I also learned tabla, rhythmic side, and some vocal from Jnan Prakash Ghosh. I also learned for quite a few years from one of the great amateur musicians, king of a state in India, Birendra Kishore Roy Chowdhury. He was a great musicologist as well as a great musician but he used to sing dhrupad only, and instruments sursringar, rabab, and sometimes been and surbahar.

Naturally, only old compositions and very traditional music, no gat with tabla or anything-the old dhrupad style. But he was very learned! Being such a rich man, he used to invite Ustads, great musicians from every corner of India, and said, "Come on, how much money do you want? Just come and stay with me and teach me. How much money do you want?" I have seen myself he used to invite great musicians, give a lot of money, a motor car, free shelter, free house to stay, and everything was provided. In that respect he collected compositions-I myself think he's absolutely unparalleled! Nobody had so many compositions! In one rag, he could give you at least 200 old compositions, maybe from Tansen, Baiju, or maybe from Gopal Nayak, much older than that. All from great Ustads! He was such a great, and being an amateur musician and so rich, he never concealed anything from his students. Anybody could go to him and ask, "Sir, could you please teach this rag." Okay, he will sing at least a hundred compositions! That means a hundred compositions from different gharanas, different angles, how everybody treated this rag, handled that rag. He was really incredible in that respect. I used to learn from him all these old compositions both vocal and instrumental, then after some time he thought that as he was not a practical performer nor expert in sitar technique and other things, then he actually suggested that I had better go to Maihar to Baba Allauddin Khansahib and learn from him. He first introduced me to him.

Had you already heard Allauddin Khan?

Yes, earlier.

So at that stage in your life you were fully committed to pursue a music career?

Yes, and all credit must go to my father. When I was about 9 or 10 years old, one day my father told me, "Look at us, we are really amateur musicians. If you really want to learn this music you must take it as a profession, otherwise it will be useless." But I can remember when he said this my grandfather and all other family members objected very strongly! They scolded my father saying, "The future of this boy will be completely ruined!" Another thing you must know: about 40 or 50 years back, in India music was not considered a very good thing. Let me tell you another short history of this thing. During the Moghul Dynasty, in the late 17th century, Aurangzeb, the last Emperor, prohibited music strictly and there was an order from the king that anybody practicing music will be killed immediately! This was a black period in the history of Indian music you can say. During his time music was completely prohibited in India, and the culture and music of India must be grateful to the prostitute class-prostitute is not the correct word, they were called "baijis." They were the people who actually kept this art alive when it went underground during Aurangzeb's reign. The baiji class preserved the music underground, and the result was that afterwards in educated and cultured families the attitude was, "Music, you can learn it, just learn it but don't take it as a profession." Because if you take it as a profession you'll have to keep some sort of close contact with this prostitute baiji class, naturally your character will be spotted. And as I was from a priest class, therefore it was forbidden for anyone from an educated, cultured family to take music professionally.

Yet the origins of dhrupad were temple worship and music was considered a spiritual path...

Of course, but that is another side. You know this is a very important thing for Westerners to understand about Indian music: Indian music is based on spiritualism, that is the first word, you must keep it in your mind. Many people misunderstand and think it's got something to do with religion, no, absolutely no! Nothing to do with religion, but spiritualism-Indian music was practiced and learned to know the Supreme Truth. Mirabai, Tyagaraja from the South, Haridas Swami, Baiju-all these great composers and musicians were wandering saints; they never came into society nor performed in society. This is the history of Indian music, and this music was learned and it was practiced in search of truth. This is the background of Indian classical music; you must keep it in your mind always. In the temples, this music was sung every day in front of the statues, the idols. In Mathura-Brindaban, the home of dhrupad, this music is still sung. Another technical point I can tell you here: you know dhrupad has got four parts, asthai, antara, sanchari and abhog. But if you go to Mathura-Brindaban, they have got seven parts, and you cannot deny they are the originals. After the evening worship of the idols they sing in a group, purely based on rag and purely dhrupad with seven parts. If you really want to hear that, you've got to go there to the temple. Our music was either practiced by the wandering saints or it was in the temple. This is the background of Indian classical music, it was coming like that for many thousands of years. Then during the Muslim invasion of India in the 12th century, the music was composed and was sung in front of the kings to entertain. Then the passion came in our music; actually it was not there before. Passion and the worship of kings-the king is next to god-the wording of many old compositions you'll see, are all in praise of the king. And the king used to give orders, "Do this, do that." So music became part of entertainment after the Muslim invasions, before that no, absolutely no. Old compositions are all about Lord Krishna and Radha, their eternal love, all are based on this love affair, but when the Muslim invasion started then it took a dramatic change.

From the 12th century Indian classical music was bifurcated-one went to the North, one went to the South. The South preserved this rigid orthodoxy; it's still a long argument but they claim that they have maintained the purity of Indian classical music. If you keep something from any touch of the outside world perhaps that sanctity is there but it is like stagnant water. That broadness doesn't come, whereas in North Indian music, after so many invasions from Persia, Greece, Afghanistan, and so many other places, it was enriched with different combinations. That is one of the reasons why this music being so old still has got its power, whereas in Japan, China, Korea, and all these places with old civilizations, it has almost dried out. The North Indian music is always flowing, and still today also it is flowing very nicely, like "a rolling stone gathers no moss." It is very crystalline, and still full of power. Indian musicians have heard many other kinds of music, and have tried to take something from other music also, and they're still seeking. That's a very good point, I think. I like this. Unless you take some ideas from different cultures or different people, how can you really enrich your own ideas? If you do not expand, that means death and stagnation. So what happened to our South Indian music is really a great point to think about. Nowadays there are many great musicians, of course, but many of them are trying to take something from North Indian music. But perhaps you know many great musicians who often visit the U.S. are not accepted there in South India. Why? Because they have gone to the West, because they have heard other music; it's a very orthodox style. However, in North Indian music that constant flow is there.

Pandit Nikhil Banerjee's obituary by John Cosgrave:

" Pandit Nikhil Banerjee, one of India's greatest and most loved musicians, died at his home in Calcutta on Monday 27^th January, following a heart attack. A gentle, modest, unassuming man of incomparable genius, his death will be mourned throughout the world by all lovers of Indian classical music.
Born in Calcutta on October 14^th 1931, his first teacher was his father, Jitendra Nath Banerjee. A prodigy, he won the All-Bengal Sitar Competition at the age of nine, and then worked for All-India Radio. In 1947 he became a disciple of Ustad Allauddin Khan, the most renowned music teacher of North India, and a direct descendant of the famous saint-musician Miyan Tansen, one of the 'nine gems' of the court of the emperor Akbar the Great. Nikhil Banerjee studied with Allauddin Khan for seven years, living with him as a member of his family; he called him 'Baba' ('father'), and revered him. He was also a disciple of Allauddin Khan's son, the famous sarod master Ustad Ali Akbar Khan.
His concert career began in 1954, and he toured outside India many times. In 1968 he was awarded the Indian Government title 'Padma Sri,' and was named outstanding musician of the year by the Sangeet Natak Akademi (the National Academy of Performing Arts). His last public was in Calcutta on Friday 24^th January 1986; outside India it was in Carnegie Hall, New York, on Saturday 9^th November 1985.
Last June he visited Dublin with his wife Roma and daughter Debdota, his sister Mrs. Swati Mukherjee and her husband Ratan, their daughter Sheema, and the tabla master Anindo Chatterjee.
Of his concert here, Michael Dervan wrote in the Sunday Tribune that he had conveyed a true flavour of the spirituality for which Indian music is renowned, and that despite the undemonstrative introverted of his playing his concert had been enthusiastically received.
Writing in the Irish Times, Dr. Barra Boydell recorded this: "It happens perhaps a handful of times in a lifetime, an experience such as we had on Friday evening at Carysfort College, Blackrock, when the outstanding Indian musician, Nikhil Banerjee (sitar), with Anindo Chatterjee (tabla) and Sheema Mukherjee (tanpura) performed ... Two ragas were played, "Puriya Kalyan" and "Zila Khafi", both building up to breathtakingly beautiful exchanges between sitar and tabla. Although each raga lasted an hour, time did not exist while they played, and in the first I reached a state of ecstasy only to discover higher, unknown states as the ragas developed...Hopefully, a return visit will be possible, which nobody who believes in music would want to miss."
We had just completed arrangements for such a return - he was to perform in the National Concert Hall on Wednesday 22^nd October 1986 - when we heard the tragic news from Ratan Mukherjee. We are filled with grief at the thought that we will never again see his beautiful, thoughtful face. In common with all people who care about Indian music, we will be eternally grateful that we heard his music, and owe more to him than any words can express. Our thoughts are now for his wife and two daughters, and all his relatives. Their loss is beyond description."

Thanks Skud ji. IS this true though 😕


But perhaps you know many great musicians who often visit the U.S. are not accepted there in South India. Why? Because they have gone to the West, because they have heard other music; it's a very orthodox style.

That's how it is.

Even in this forum, opinions will be divided on whether still water is purer or whether it's running water (which goes through a whole load of mixes and fusions) is the purer form ....

For every North Indian who makes a face when he or she hears Carnatic music, there is a South Indian who thinks Hindustani music is not even classical!

Anyway, prejudices apart ... honest viewpoints are needed ....

Hey Skud.....thanks for the article 😛 .....Pandit Nikhil banerjee was one of the greatest Sitar maestros around 👏.He was based in South Cal close to my house......& both his daughters are my seniors in school.Have heard him play in the Doverlane Music Conf & boy! what a performance!!!! 👏

It i sreally interesting how he finds the reason of these two stream line. it could be very true. Kurdish, Persia in their music you feel the flavor of Indian music or could be vice versa that we adopted it.
Will be really interesting to know what the people that learn music say here. I also await their comment on this.

Originally posted by: nonny

Hey Skud.....thanks for the article 😛 .....Pandit Nikhil banerjee was one of the greatest Sitar maestros around 👏.He was based in South Cal close to my house......& both his daughters are my seniors in school.Have heard him play in the Doverlane Music Conf & boy! what a performance!!!! 👏

nonny ji, I am very fortunate to listen to him live Pandit Nikhil banerjee was one of the greatest Sitar maestros still around.

Infact Nikhil Banerjee is right in his observations regarding the evolution of the two forms of classical music. Carnatic music survived on coterie, upper-caste production whereas Hindustani was freely borrowed by other castes and religions. Till some point in time (around the 12th century as mentioned) there was hardly any difference, and it's only after that one even hears of different schools. Even now, the raagas that have a lot of Carnatic influence are termed as 'Mangala' ragas in Hindustani, in the sense that while they are fit into a time slot, they can still be played any time of the day .....

I somehow feel that Hindustani music is much more relaxed .... more accessible and much more languid. Easier to understand. In carnatic music, too much stress is given on aroham and avarohanam, beat cycles and so on ... techinque is more respected and regarded than bhaava. The essence of the song is actually missed ...

Infact the difference manifests even in the teaching methods ... hindustani music explores so many ragas in so many types of songs whereas carnatic music demands endless hours of practising sarali varisai or janda varisai ...

I wish Kishore_bhaktaji, Abhi, Geetadi was around for their insightful comments ...

Punjiniji, Raghav, SoulSoup and others ... what are your viewpoints ?

I love the sound of Nikhil Banerjee's sitar - just adore it. I loved his music but knew nothing about him! Thank you so much Skud for this interview. I have never read anything said by him, so I am really grateful to get an insight into his thinking, his growing up years, his learning process. Thank you a thousand times!