Hi Mr management
Not sure if a jump from 2.68 to 3.87 is a slip in the ratings.Any ways no one wants to compare DID season 2 to DID doubles.But alot of members in this forum(Dont want to take names) were saying that ratings of DID season 2 were around 5 or 6 and DID doubles is no where near so they started the comparison.Which is obviously not true.And there is not much difference in the ratings for the two as well DID season 2 opened with 3.9 and DID doubles opened with 3.6 .Yes DID doubles slipped in week 3 like DID season 2 slipped in later weeks but DID doubles has bounced back in the last week.Just because DID season 2 had more than 4 ratings in two weeks doesn't mean that avg rating is 4.Anyways enough of comparison my basic point was that members who ever they are should stop claiming that there is a huge difference between the ratings between the two which is obviously not true and start seeing the show for the great dancing and start appreciating the show.
I have no problem accepting the facts, the basis of my argument was that DID 2 had better ratings than Doubles, it doesn't matter if the ratings were better by .1 or by 3, but the point is that DID 2 was a better package with the mentors, contestants, format. That is my what I am debating. I love Dancing and I will continue to watch DID because dance is big part of my life and also because DID is my favorite. But that doesn't mean I can't accept the fact that DID popularity is in decline. Also, when some of the members were saying that DID ratings were 5 they were referring to its opening episode, compared to DID doubles first weeks ratings of about 4. I have posted the article that states that DID 2 opening ratings were 4.9.
http://www.tellychakkar.com/news/dance-india-dance-has-india-foot-tapping-records-highest-viewer-rating