Babu outshines Parvati - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

45

Views

3.8k

Users

17

Likes

202

Frequent Posters

Sid4TeamCanada thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 14 years ago
#41

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Krishna had spoken like that to Pratigya the way Adarsh spoke to Komal in front of everyone, this forum would turn into a battlefield by bashing Krishna.

Adarsh constantly joins others in belittling his wife . Its AWFUL the way they pick on Komal , the whole eDUCATED lot . U know what , I hope Aman genuinely mARRIES Arushi and teaches Adarsh and Shamu the lesson of their life for having their noses up in the air abt this IZZATDAR RISHTA

😆😆😆😆😆eeeeyuppppppppppppppppppppp! wow amusing posts!
har jaga adarsh ki izzat ho rahi hai hai lagta hai!😆😆😆😆 adarsh and his aristotle dad are jokers yar, infact the whole SAKS clan is joker😆😆😆, well with the exception of pratigya (and nainaji) who it seems still to an extent have the respect for others regardless of their level of literacy
Sid4TeamCanada thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 14 years ago
#42
niceee!!! what a reply! and i thought it was only me who thought it was wrong of aristotle to meddle in their affairs and to encourage his daughter to IMPRISON HER IN-LAWS
SS rocks yaar! truly he is sooo funny! and he has always pretty much respected or tried to respect saxs as much as he can! but SAXENAS have left no opportunity of dissing or backbiting abt thakurs go waste! jab mauka mile, kisi na kisi ke baare mein shuru ho jaata hai koi na koi... kabhi arushi madam abt krishna.. toh kabhi daadi abt the GAWAAR BAHU AND GAWAAR THAKURS!
Aeryn thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#43


when SS said about her complaining to the police I was laughing and going yes your right buddy be proactive and let her go.😆😆 That was a slap on Pratigyas hypocrisy. Honestly Kools if someone insults your husband and you taken offence, what is the one emotion you willd efo display - ANGER. Did she look angry to you at any point of time - at her house when she received the news, or at IG's house when she face the person who had brought about the humiliation, or in her own bedroom when she walked in - she did not look angry as she should have. she looked contemplative. the entire time she looked contemplative. to me it looked like she was trying to break the news in such a manner that would garner his sympathy and support for her family's actions. does a defiant person behave that way? when she told him she turned her back to him. why? why was she looking so guilty? should she not have been looking defiant? if she truly meant what she said about not going where her husband was not welcome - that affront would have shown on her face from teh mind she heard the news to the minute she delivered it to her husband. For a fearless passionate girl to display contemplation and signs of guilty instead of defiance and anger makes me think that till the moment SS used the reverse psychology she had NO intention of saying or doing what she did rather she was still hoping to talk Krishna into seeing her family's mahjboori and the convention of her attendance at the marriage. It is not what she said but her behaviour before she said it that killed the effect of the declaration for me and made me feel it was pandering. we all know Krishna loves being pandered by her.

@bold - 100% agree with you. That's how I felt. It's exactly why I didn't like the scene. Everyone were overjoyed by it -- for the first time she has taken her husband's side but the thing is CVs have turned it in a such a way that her stance didn't seem sincere at all. Yes she has supported him but was her heart in it? I doubt it..... A woman truly affected by her husband's humiliation would not act this way.....Upon hearing the condition, if she truly meant 'I will not go where my pati and sasural are not invited' then anger and indignation should have been present on her face.....I have seen neither.....upon receiving the news, a resounding NO should have come instinctively...
kuthisonam thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#44
Actually it was not Goddess Parvati it was Goddess Sati, the first incarnation of Shakti who was then reborn as Parvati.
mushiroxx thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 14 years ago
#45

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

. All this YOU only taught me she told ARISTOTLE aka SHamu . I lEARnt it all at YOUR feet , these values . . Naturally Shamu was mollified . Krishna was Thrillofied . And Amma was HORRIFIED . .

ArjaAddict thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 14 years ago
#46
i wish dat she supports him like dis only i the cuming epis!!

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".