Will they use the veto power on Tia? - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

28

Views

2.6k

Users

16

Likes

35

Frequent Posters

-Aaliyah- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#21

Originally posted by: Ishan.

<font color="#990000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Acc. to me, Veto should be used for Bhoomi , becoz she is a good singer ! 😃
</font>



Only reason I like Bhoomi is cause her voice is like mine and she's Gujju!
brahmabul thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#22
RUsmart ji...that was not a smart question at all...😛
somone999 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#23
It is strange to even ask this question!

They will use veto only to eliminate her, not to bring her back. 😆
kaushikbasu thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#24
If they have not used their veto for a performer who got voted out just after giving the best performance, then whats the use of having a gala round every week and commenting on singers? This means they already have made up their minds on who to save in case he or she is eliminated.
somone999 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#25

Originally posted by: kaushikbasu

If they have not used their veto for a performer who got voted out just after giving the best performance, then whats the use of having a gala round every week and commenting on singers? This means they already have made up their minds on who to save in case he or she is eliminated.


I don't agree with you. Naushad was voted on the base 'more' of his previous Kawali Performance. And it was not outstanding as compared to that of Shivam and Sreeram. When you have more brilliant and consistent singers than the one being eliminated, I think it is quite an intelligent decision, not to use the veto. Because, had they used the veto this time, it would have actually done injustice with those contestants who have always given their best from time to time. That's my point of view, of course. Cheers!
kaushikbasu thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#26

Originally posted by: somone999


I don't agree with you. Naushad was voted on the base 'more' of his previous Kawali Performance. And it was not outstanding as compared to that of Shivam and Sreeram. When you have more brilliant and consistent singers than the one being eliminated, I think it is quite an intelligent decision, not to use the veto. Because, had they used the veto this time, it would have actually done injustice with those contestants who have always given their best from time to time. That's my point of view, of course. Cheers!

I agree to your second portion to some extent but then he was given performer of the episode for that specific episode and not for Qawali round. About Sreeram and Shivam better than him on that specific episode is debateable, and as per judges, that was not the case. Now after Sreeram and Shivam it was a toss up between rakesh and Naushad as per the judges comments are concerned, yet the let him go just after judgeing him the best performer of the day, now would they save Rakesh or Shivam or Sreeram even if he is eliminated after haveing an off day? I know the answer is not that simple but people can allege partiality to that, because as I said earlier then they have made up their mind so they can say that up front, that we would use veto only if such and such person is eliminated because to us he/she is the best.
Edited by kaushikbasu - 15 years ago
somone999 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#27

Originally posted by: kaushikbasu

I agree to your second portion to some extent but then he was given performer of the episode for that specific episode and not for Qawali round. About Sreeram and Shivam better than him on that specific episode is debateable, and as per judges, that was not the case. Now after Sreeram and Shivam it was a toss up between rakesh and Naushad as per the judges comments are concerned, yet the let him go just after judgeing him the best performer of the day, now would they save Rakesh or Shivam or Sreeram even if he is eliminated after haveing an off day? I know the answer is not that simple but people can allege partiality to that, because as I said earlier then they have made up their mind so they can say that up front, that we would use veto only if such and such person is eliminated because to us he/she is the best.


Well, the veto is for once only and should be used for the best and most deserving, not everyone. 😊
Thanks for sharing your point of view. Cheers!
RUSmart thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#28
😉@brahmabul. I hope u understand the sarcastic question. If they have abstained from using it on Naushad and Shashi, and only 6 particpants, on who else will they use it. I dont think there is going to be any wild card entry and the only misfit in the last 6 participants is ...........I hope u know who. Thanks anyway for the comment.
Quality_Videos thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#29
They will use on Rakesh or Shivam whoever eliminates first

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".