<font color="#990000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Acc. to me, Veto should be used for Bhoomi , becoz she is a good singer ! 😃
</font>
Only reason I like Bhoomi is cause her voice is like mine and she's Gujju!
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: Second Semi-Final- India vs Eng🏏
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: First Semi-Final- SA vs NZ🏏
Toxic Postponed To 4th June 2026
TATTOO OF MAA 5.3
HOLI GADBAD 4.3
Abhimaan Ki 4th Shaadi
"I don't recognize my country anymore": Angelina Jolie
Abeekmaan are cringe
Avatar & Signatures Shop BC 2026 | V-Day Celebration | VOTING ON!
<font color="#990000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Acc. to me, Veto should be used for Bhoomi , becoz she is a good singer ! 😃
</font>
Originally posted by: kaushikbasu
If they have not used their veto for a performer who got voted out just after giving the best performance, then whats the use of having a gala round every week and commenting on singers? This means they already have made up their minds on who to save in case he or she is eliminated.
I agree to your second portion to some extent but then he was given performer of the episode for that specific episode and not for Qawali round. About Sreeram and Shivam better than him on that specific episode is debateable, and as per judges, that was not the case. Now after Sreeram and Shivam it was a toss up between rakesh and Naushad as per the judges comments are concerned, yet the let him go just after judgeing him the best performer of the day, now would they save Rakesh or Shivam or Sreeram even if he is eliminated after haveing an off day? I know the answer is not that simple but people can allege partiality to that, because as I said earlier then they have made up their mind so they can say that up front, that we would use veto only if such and such person is eliminated because to us he/she is the best.Originally posted by: somone999
I don't agree with you. Naushad was voted on the base 'more' of his previous Kawali Performance. And it was not outstanding as compared to that of Shivam and Sreeram. When you have more brilliant and consistent singers than the one being eliminated, I think it is quite an intelligent decision, not to use the veto. Because, had they used the veto this time, it would have actually done injustice with those contestants who have always given their best from time to time. That's my point of view, of course. Cheers!
Originally posted by: kaushikbasu
I agree to your second portion to some extent but then he was given performer of the episode for that specific episode and not for Qawali round. About Sreeram and Shivam better than him on that specific episode is debateable, and as per judges, that was not the case. Now after Sreeram and Shivam it was a toss up between rakesh and Naushad as per the judges comments are concerned, yet the let him go just after judgeing him the best performer of the day, now would they save Rakesh or Shivam or Sreeram even if he is eliminated after haveing an off day? I know the answer is not that simple but people can allege partiality to that, because as I said earlier then they have made up their mind so they can say that up front, that we would use veto only if such and such person is eliminated because to us he/she is the best.