Originally posted by: pink500
Hi everyone,
just thinking, now since shantanu has told everyone that dev is innocent, why is radhika even listening to him. In real life no one is that dumb. It is not like she signed a legal contract with him that she is going to listen to him😊 She can easily back out. She has many opportunities to tell her whole family the condition he put forward and they can all teach him a lesson together. It just so stupid how is still lying to her family after she what happened due to her lying the first time. What do you guys think. Please comment😊
I think Radhika has given HER WORD to Shantanu. She cannot back out because Shantanu has fufilled his part of the bargain and it would be grossly inethical of Radhika not to fulfil her side of the bargain. It think it is just not a done thing, not right to renege on a bargain. I agree with Radhika in this aspect that she must fulfil her promise, otherwise she is not a person of integrity.
Having said that, I do not agree that Radhika decides to embark on this fulfilment of obligation on her own. I thought the past events would have taught her to be more upfront, especially to her husband. But sadly, she is acting high handed again. Doing things without discussing it with her husband. I can understand if her husband is a grossly hot tempered man who only wants things his way, but in this case Dev is a very understanding, very loving husband who has so much trust in his wife. Radhika should respect this quality of her husband, especially in his trust of her. She should have been upfront with her husband, after he has been vindicated (not before, because, he may likely rather suffer than to go along with Shantanu). After Dev had been vindicated, Radhika should have told him the condition that Shantanu had agreed to support Dev. She should have shared her problems with her husband who had promised to take care of her and to share her problems.
This is the Radhika i don't quite like - i did not like how she ignored everyone's plea as to why Shantanu was brought. I think the family deserved an explanation before he came and not present him, during a very religious ceremony, which she should have attended to in its entirety. She could always have gone to fetch Shantanu after the ceremony. After the ceremonyh she could have given a short explanation to prepare the family for Shantanu's appearance : eg., "Dev is vindicated, his honour and the purohit's honour was returned due to the support given by Shantanu. Shantanu and Vikram did not lie but was honest but in order for them to state it in front of all i had to make a deal with them. I therefore appeal to you to please understand to accept what i am going to do next on trust. ONe day i will be able to tell you more but till then, please understand and accept." some thing like that. But nooooooo, she ups and leaves the religious ceremony and then brings this distasteful character right smack in themiddle of the ceremony to the shock and dismay of the family. Wrong Radhika Wrong!!
I don't know, maybe most will not agree with me but i really do not condone hiding things.