When the show started Armaan was portrayed as a man who moves on from one girlfriend to another whereas Ridhima looked for commitment and steadfast love! She had many misunderstanding with Armaan because of this issue.
What an irony, now Ridhima is oh so ready to move on and Armaan steadfastly loves her!! In two and half years they definitely rubbed each other's characteristics onto the other person!!!😉
Believe me, I'm trying to understand Ridhima ..
In the forum, many people have defended Ridhima's action saying she has a right to move on. When your love is not returned or when the other person does not love you as much you love him, the concept of move on is understandable and one should move on in that circumstances. But when you love somebody and that somebody also loves you equally if not more, why would you move on? What for?
Right now there are two scenarios...
a)Ridhima has only gratitude for Sid: In this case I don't think she should give much significance to the marriage! She is barely married for few weeks and doesn't even have any physical relationship with him.
b)Ridhima has started loving Sid: It goes against the grain but let's say her characteristics have changed!😕 In this case I don't think she deserves to be the love of armaan. You may give HDDCS example but even in the movie Nandini never spent 2 and half years with her love! Ridhima's falling in love with Sid so swiftly can make only thing very obvious that she was never in love with Armaan in the first place!! It will mean, she only compromised because of Armaan's continuous persuasion. Maybe that is why she never bothered to ask how Arman was when they met! It really beats me considering she is a doctor and meeting Armaan for the first time after his grave illness!!
Discussion with logic and constructive analysis is welcome! 😊