Bhakwaas bandh karo JYOTI ; have diarrhoea CM

Page

sundara

@sundara

Explorer

Posted: 16 years ago

What is Jyoti upto , inviting the useless Vashisht parivaar for the wedding??

And she is ready to disappear whereas she wants Sudha to be shaamil in the wedding.. Has she gone mad or what? Jyoti is irritating me showing the idiot image...good girl image is bearable..

What's the strong need for Sudha to be in the wedding if the human flesh eating CM wants some horrible conditions to be satisfied... after all, its because of Jyoti, Deepu met Poonam ...Jyoti's point was to invite the ppl which she did..whether they want to come or not, it only shows their disrespect...not Jyoti's. Why shud Jyoti force this invite on Vashishts, I dont get it...

They could send a video tape to Sudha's house after the wedding..she cud watch it on big screen TV as long as the big beast woman CM doesnt come in front of the screen coz when she appears on screen, she covers a lot of characters , that elephant. 😆 😆 😆

Wonder how come the other Vashisht ppl are thin or fit or average but not CM.. this woman is eating human flesh from all over Udaipur,,, best saasuma character I 've ever seen on TV... she does her role very well... and also gives an additional trembling effect to my TV/laptop even if its kept on mute... 😆 😆 I want CM to have diarrhoea during Pankaj's wedding and lose her so called useless izzat in the lavatory..

Jyoti gives me headache by being sooooo good and idiotic ..and CM makes me want to rip her head off that mega body and feed it to the dogs in Udaipur...lol...

Quote

Frequent Posters

Piasengupta21

@Piasengupta21

Inactive

Posted: 16 years ago

No i don't agree with you Sundara ji.. I think Sudha had the right to choose if she wants to go to her Brother's marriage..I think it is justifiable..I think Jyoti had invited Vashists as Sudha's Sasural not Jyoti's.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Vrish

@Vr15h

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 16 years ago

No, I agree w/ Sundara, even though I haven't watched the episode: Sudha has a right to be there, but not @ the expense of Jyoti. Jyoti's job was to just invite them - it's upto the Vashisths whether they want to come or not. The Sharmas don't owe it to them to make Jyoti scarce for Deepu's wedding. If I were Deepu in this situation, I'd tell Jyoti flatly that Sudha or her family is unwelcome.

Jyoti had no business forcing the Vashisths to come to the wedding. In fact, CM could have accused Jyoti of trying to distract from Pankaj's wedding, and banned even Sudha from going to Deepu's wedding. I wish she did that, although I don't know

Quote

mahmansma

@mahmansma

Explorer

Posted: 16 years ago

I am so much in agreement with you, Sundara. This image of Jyoti is intolerable. Gives me a migraine to see her 'sacrificing' each and every thing that gives her happiness.

Being the source of happiness to your family is one thing, giving them happiness while wallowing in sorrow yourself is another thing.

GROW UP AND BE HUMAN!!!

This show has already been moved to an unpopular timing, PLUS if the story line is going to get weaker...even God can't save this.

Quote

Vrish

@Vr15h

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 16 years ago

Sundara/Pushpak

I had written my above comments just based on what you wrote, b4 seeing the show myself. I still agree w/ you, but there were some more things I noticed about Jyoti:

Her insistence that Pankaj be there. Why? Yeah, Pankaj is Sudha's bro-in-law, but @ he's not related to the Sharmas the same way Pratik or Minal is: he is their ex son-in-law as well, and the ex part of it is for a reason: the family concertedly worked to deceive him, so asking him to be present @ their 'chote khushiyon' is really being cruel to him: he's snapped relations w/ them for a good reason. First of all, it was wrong of Jyoti to go to that house - Sushma should have gone instead - but second of all, when Pankaj left the room on hearing Jyoti, it was wrong of her to follow him and try and insist that he come. Doesn't Pankaj have a right not to be in settings where he is uncomfortable/unhappy? If he goes, chances are likely that all the friends/well-wishers of the Sharmas will hate him, regardless of whether Jyoti is there or not.
I disagree that CM should have made Sudha's being allowed there conditional on Jyoti's not being there: that's not going to make a difference. Following her logic, had Sudha (and/or Uday) been there, the name was bound to come up, and consequently, the issue would as well, even if Pankaj & Jyoti weren't there, since this is a Sharma family function. What CM should have done should have been to flatly say that Sudha wasn't allowed, and that was due to the Sharma family deceiving them. Or, if she wants to put on the facade of the Vashisths not having anything against the Sharmas, then she could have tactfully done it by saying that they were all busy w/ Pankaj's engagement, and therefore, couldn't spare Sudha for the wedding. That way, Jyoti wouldn't get to play martyr again.
What Jyoti is doing by inviting the Vashisths in the first place would be almost akin to Bhairavi & Minal going to her place and inviting everybody for Pankaj/Neelam's wedding. Imagine how they'd feel - having to be among the Vashisths for hours. Similarly, the Vashisths too wouldn't be enjoying the company here, even though Sandeep/Poonam ain't analogous to Pankaj/Neelam.

mahmansma

What Jyoti would be doing would not be giving anyone happiness - none of the Sharmas would be happy, and I daresay even the Trivedis would be very unhappy, since they appreciate Jyoti putting this rishta together. As a matter of fact, even Sudha wouldn't be happy @ Deepu's wedding knowing that b'cos of her, Jyoti can't be there. So it's incorrect to say that Jyoti is sacrificing and making her family happy - they'd be doubly unhappy b'cos of this. Sudha's absense they can live w/, since she could have work @ home related to Pankaj's marriage, but Jyoti's absense from this, given her role in putting it altogether is unthinkable.

My prediction: Uday will force CM to relent and allow himself & Sudha to visit the wedding w/o that condition on Jyoti. In the end, this will be just another natak.

Quote

mahmansma

@mahmansma

Explorer

Posted: 16 years ago

Vrisha, then WHY is jyoti doing all this 'sacrificing' stuff? Is she a masochist? I can'g figure her out. But, I am really starting to dislike her for being the stupidest doormat ever. Why put up with Padma and her gold digging ways? Has she forgotten HOW Padma turned her horoscope into a manglik, made Sandeep talk all dirty stuff about her? Has she forgotten how Padma supported Brij's turning Sudha against her? Has she forgotten all the humiliation CM heaped on her (why go to their house in the first place to invite them?),

What is her problem? I think rather than Sudha, Jyoti needs psychiatric help, but PLEASE don't go to Kalpana!

Grow a backbone, seems to the mantra that is needed here.

Quote

sundara

@sundara

Explorer

Posted: 16 years ago

Yeah, totally agree with Vrisha regarding the way Jyoti went to invite Pankaj in his room and begging him to be in the occasion..Also, the way Jyoti is still talking to Pankaj in a meeti aawaaz with the JI JI suffix irritates me more than anything else. Has she forgotten that Pankaj is the one who accused Jyoti that she is carrying Brij's baby...

Why is she even giving them chances to insult her more...the way she said "aap se jhoot kyun boloon Pankaj ji" and then corrected herself for using ironic words...very funny... She likes the vashisht ppl to walk over her again and again...probably that's what gives her satisfaction like what mahmansma says...

She might as well married Brij and had a kind of masochistic relationship ... In Brij's family thr was only Brij..so probably she needed more ppl to treat her like a doormat.. wah Jyoti.. kya DOORMAT saabith kiya thumne... applause 👏

Edited by sundara - 16 years ago

Quote

Bhakwaas bandh karo JYOTI ; have diarrhoea CM

Related Topics

Explore Topics