Please give us a reason why you like Panna's voice. Please be comparative and ignore his dancing avility and his look.
Please give us a reason why you like Panna's voice. Please be comparative and ignore his dancing avility and his look.
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 5th Nov '25
BASHAN ON PDA 5.11
REPLACEMENT 6.11
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Nov 5, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Filmmaker Mira Nair’s son becomes NYC Mayor
Ashna Kishore To Play Ranvijay’s Ex-Wife
🏏Series: India tour of Australia, 2025, Aus vs India,4th T 20🏏
Abhishek Bajaj - Worst Contestant
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Nov 6, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Is King going to be the biggest hit or flop of 2026?
Was Prajit’s exit drama was staged just to save Kunika?
Disgusting Amaal
Heights Of Ridiculousness
Haq review and box office
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 6th Nov 2025
What was this Nomination
🥳🥳Happy Birthday Rockingsunny 🥳🥳
Originally posted by: sadhana K
Are you asking for a technical analysis of his voice? Not all people base their choice of a singer on objective analysis alone.
For people like me, there is a total dissociation between the objective and subjective analysis.
Panna sings fairly well, (sounds good to my ears),and is very presentable; so ,I like his voice. I don't think there are specific criteria which need to be fulfilled to achieve that.
In this stage of this competation every one expected to sing well, because they were chosen as a cream out of corn. However, out of 12, do you think Panna has an outstanding voice which can take him to long way. Obviously, performance is important for this kind of show, but when you do the playback, do you realy need performance? It is very essential for a person to be good at in singing rather than in performance in oder to establish himself or hershef as great singer for a long time.
In this stage of this competation every one expected to sing well, because they were chosen as a cream out of corn. However, out of 12, do you think Panna has an outstanding voice which can take him to long way. Obviously, performance is important for this kind of show, but when you do the playback, do you realy need performance? It is very essential for a person to be good at in singing rather than in performance in oder to establish himself or hershef as great singer for a long time.
I totally agree w/ u...i mean look at Asha Bhosle, Lata Mageshkar, Mohammed Rafi, and all the famous "singers"....they don't perform! but they r still in the industry and r considered a legend...Indian Idol shud live to the level of being considered as a legend...
do u guyz think if Panna wins...he will be called a legend in the future??
Excuse me! I don't think the stage has been set to hunt for playback singers! At least, that is not what I understand.
In this stage of this competation every one expected to sing well, because they were chosen as a cream out of corn. However, out of 12, do you think Panna has an outstanding voice which can take him to long way. Obviously, performance is important for this kind of show, but when you do the playback, do you realy need performance? It is very essential for a person to be good at in singing rather than in performance in oder to establish himself or hershef as great singer for a long time.
This competition is more of a contest for stage performance-hence, voice alone is not the criterion. Why do you think Farah Khan is on the judges' panel? Not to judge the pure singing talent. In fact, she has really put down Meenal(a good singer!) on more than one occasion for lack of performance.
Again, I maintain what is important in this contest is 'a total package'. Also, Panna is not a bad singer - I would rank him in the middle order amongst the current contestants.
In this stage of this competation every one expected to sing well, because they were chosen as a cream out of corn. However, out of 12, do you think Panna has an outstanding voice which can take him to long way. Obviously, performance is important for this kind of show, but when you do the playback, do you realy need performance? It is very essential for a person to be good at in singing rather than in performance in oder to establish himself or hershef as great singer for a long time.
I totally agree w/ u...i mean look at Asha Bhosle, Lata Mageshkar, Mohammed Rafi, and all the famous "singers"....they don't perform! but they r still in the industry and r considered a legend...Indian Idol shud live to the level of being considered as a legend...
do u guyz think if Panna wins...he will be called a legend in the future??
You mean to say-Abhijeet Sawant/Qazi/Rooprekha-are all going to be known as legends? If so,then Panna will too!Originally posted by: sadhana K
Excuse me! I don't think the stage has been set to hunt for playback singers! At least, that is not what I understand.
This competition is more of a contest for stage performance-hence, voice alone is not the criterion. Why do you think Farah Khan is on the judges' panel? Not to judge the pure singing talent. In fact, she has really put down Meenal(a good singer!) on more than one occasion for lack of performance.
Again, I maintain what is important in this contest is 'a total package'. Also, Panna is not a bad singer - I would rank him in the middle order amongst the current contestants.
I totally agree w/ u...i mean look at Asha Bhosle, Lata Mageshkar, Mohammed Rafi, and all the famous "singers"....they don't perform! but they r still in the industry and r considered a legend...Indian Idol shud live to the level of being considered as a legend...
do u guyz think if Panna wins...he will be called a legend in the future??
You mean to say-Abhijeet Sawant/Qazi/Rooprekha-are all going to be known as legends? If so,then Panna will too!
Yes...i do think that Abhijeet Sawant in the future will be a legend bcz he was the FIRST II.....Qazi and Rooprekha r already gone in the wind...😆😆 and i didn't mean to say that Panna is a bad singer.....as u said v r looking for a "complete package"......so u think Amey or Karunya r not complete packages?? they don't entertain u??