Posted:
True. Now the way you have put it I remeber reading something regarding Anjalika years ago, I think in Midday. The way the article was written seemed like a piece of trash. The way they word it, you know their intentions.
There is another thought that comes to my mind and may be I can share it here. I feel its wrong to always put our celebs on a pedastal all the time. We can't seem to take the slightest possibility that they too can faulter. One gossip and years of liking goes out of the window. They are human beings at the end of the day. Like we make mistakes they do too. I think as an audience we need to get one thing right. Do we like XYZ for the work they do, for what they are known OR how good / bad they are as human beings. Later is something we would never know and our levels of appretiations will keep changing with such gossip columns. But if we like them for their work, the work due to which we took notice of them then nothing matter after that. There is so much talk going on about a golfer these days. What he did in his personal life does not make him a bad golfer now. But how people look at him has chnaged for the worse, we forget what we liked him for. Here I am not commneting or if its right or wrong, my point is why should their personal life decisions change our opinions so drastically. I wonder if I am able to get my point across,
Anyway, irrespective of what the truth might be, nothing changed the way I looked at Daya Sir then, nothing changes now.
Cricket
31