debayon thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 16 years ago
#1
Guys, what do you think about the error made by Dr. Panchauri's team about the rapid meltdown of glaciers. Do you think he deserves another chance or should resign immediately? I feel he deserves another chance because it's not a very big error and it can be overlooked and besides, people can make mistakes but at least he admitted that there had been some mistake. People make mistakes all the time, the important things is rectifying them. Plz post your views.😊

Created

Last reply

Replies

12

Views

776

Users

6

Likes

4

Frequent Posters

SolidSnake thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#2
Before I go to sleep..he is Dr.Pachauri and not Panchauri.
debayon thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 16 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: SolidSnake

Before I go to sleep..he is Dr.Pachauri and not Panchauri.

Didn't I say that on my comment?😕
Sherraz thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#4
I don't think he deserves another chance. He needs to take the responsibility.
debayon thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 16 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: finicky2010

I don't think he deserves another chance. He needs to take the responsibility.

Take the responsibility for what? Something his team did? Although he is the head, that doesn't make him accountable for everything. Besides, the error is not very huge. It's not like we would die immmediately. So, he should be forgiven. And also, he deserves another chance because this is his first mistake and people make mistakes all the time. That doesn't mean that you punish them and lower their morale.
Summer3 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 16 years ago
#6
For Benefit of some readers, an article below.
The whole issue is a major embarassment , but they should take mathematics more seriously.😆

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change chairman R K Pachauri termed as a "human error" the findings in its report about melting of Himalayan glaciers, but ruled out his resignation on the issue.

Pachauri, who is under attack from various quarters over the IPCC's 2007 report that said the glaciers in the Himalayas will disappear by 2035 due to global warming, said the mistake was "unfortunate". "I have no intention to of resigning from my position. I have a task. I am going to complete the Fifth Assessment Report," he told media-persons in New Delhi [
Images ].

Pachauri said the IPCC is a body of hundreds of eminent scientists selected and nominated by different governments. "There are huge problems on climate change. Climate change is not limited to Himalayan glaciers. Rational people will continue to repose faith in IPCC," he said. The IPCC chief said the Fourth Assessment Report of the Panel was a "robust report" but the error with regard to the conclusion on Himalayan glaciers was "unfortunate". "This was a human error. We will do everything to see that such mistakes are not repeated," he said.

Pachauri said the IPCC will not take action against any of the authors of the report. "We have no right to take any action against any author. They are not employees of IPCC," he said. The IPCC is under fire for having included in its 2007 report -- without proper peer review -- an assertion that glaciers in the Himalayas will disappear by 2035 due to global warming. It had retracted the statement just three days back.

Researcher Murari Lal was in-charge of editing the chapter on glaciers in the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC and had based the controversial finding on a media interview of glaciologist S I Hasnain. Pachauri said IPCC is utilising the Noble Peace Prize money for starting a cadre of scientists in different developing countries who would assess the problem of climate change in their respective regions.

Earlier, experts behind the report had admitted that the IPCC warning -- that global warming will melt most of the Himalayan glaciers by 2035 -- was based on a 'speculative' article published in New Scientist."I know a lot of climate skeptics are after my blood, but I'm in no mood to oblige them. It was a collective failure by a number of people. I need to consider what action to take, but that will take several weeks. It's best to think with a cool head, rather than shoot from the hip," The Times quoted Dr Pachauri as saying.

Dr Pachauri said that the IPCC's report was the responsibility of the panel's former co-chairs, British scientist Dr Martin Parry and Argentine meteorologist Dr Osvaldo Canziani.

"I don't want to blame them, but typically the working group reports are managed by the co-chairs. Of course, the chair is there to facilitate things, but we have substantial amounts of delegation," Dr Pachauri said.

"Frankly, it was a stupid error. But no one brought it to my attention," he added.

He also declined to blame the 25 authors and editors of the erroneous part of the report.

But Syed Hasnain, the Indian glaciologist erroneously quoted as making the 2035 prediction, said that responsibility had to lie with them. He and other leading glaciologists pointed out at least five glaring errors in the relevant section.

It says the total area of Himalyan glaciers "will likely shrink from the present 500,000 to 100,000 square kilometers by the year 2035". There are only 33,000 square kilometers of glaciers in the Himalayas.

A table below says that between 1845 and 1965, the Pindari Glacier shrank by 2,840 m -- a rate of 135.2 m a year. The actual rate is only 23.5m a year.

Edited by Summer3 - 16 years ago
debayon thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 16 years ago
#7
His excuse isn't good enough but still, this is his first mistake. What about all his achievements which outnumber his mistakes?
Sherraz thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: debayon

Take the responsibility for what? Something his team did? Although he is the head, that doesn't make him accountable for everything. Besides, the error is not very huge. It's not like we would die immmediately. So, he should be forgiven. And also, he deserves another chance because this is his first mistake and people make mistakes all the time. That doesn't mean that you punish them and lower their morale.

He is the head and that makes him accountable for everything his team does, period.
Summer3 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 16 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: debayon

His excuse isn't good enough but still, this is his first mistake. What about all his achievements which outnumber his mistakes?

As we should take into account his good works too.
I would say just let it go and in future be more careful and recheck all numbers.
chal_phek_mat thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#10
The entire global warming/climate issue has been murky with research being made to meet theoretical conclusions and researches being used to justify government money. This is the biggest emerging industry right now across the world with the scale of hundreds of billions of dollars being spent
funny there is very little difference between G.W and Al Gore on this modus operandi, only G.W got crucified for making up stuff, Al Gore got a nobel prize. Both seem to have noble intentions
Coming back to the topic, yes he should be punished and punished hard, you/me(or perhaps your parents too, if this is the case, remember you are not getting that fancy i-phone because of that😉) are spending our hard-earned tax money to pay for this kind of stuff in whatever country we live in and while the cause is good,

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".