What's your input on this?
Page
of
1Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 19th Nov '25
Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 33
TAMING BACK 19.11
ACCIDENT MISS 20.11
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Nov 19, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Aishwarya Rai and Sachin Tendulkar in Puttaparthi
Shah Rukh Khan and Salman Khan dancing at wedding.
Fake PR - Priyanka Chopra
Halloween Writing Contest Voting
FIR Against SS Rajamouli
The Dr Kaira Chapter.
Hmm...I think Harry would have lived with James. Even if Dumbledore objected, James wouldn't have let Harry live with the Dursleys as long as he was alive. He would protect him all he could :)
That's pretty deep..... wow.... let me see....
He probably would have lived with James because I think he would have been sufficient enough to protect him.... if anything happened to James in the future, then Harry could go and live with James's relatives... it would work the same because James would also have given his life trying to protect Harry.... so as long as James was safe, then Harry would probably have stayed with him... :P
Originally posted by: joequinn
if that happens,i guess JK Rowling will write 7 books again.
Originally posted by: Maryam.U
Hmmm...the story can be constructed both ways.....since his father was still alive he could protect harry well enough that harry didn't have to go to the dursleys or dumbledore may still have sent harry to dursleys to protect him in a way his father couldn't?!
The thing is the current story says(correct me if i'm wrong) that harry was sent to the dursleys and not any other willing magical family so that the only protection he had left would be strengthenedBUT if his father would have been alive his mother's sacrifice would not have been the ONLY protection he had! so no he wouldn' have been sent to the dursley familyinstead dumbledore and james would have found a way to protect harry like they were doing before the attack when they knew voldemort would be attcking them
Originally posted by: _LalithaJanaki_
Wow, great input! This def makes sense. I too think James wouldn't have let Dumbledore leave Harry with the Dursleys, because righfully, Harry was his son.